scholarly journals Robotic partial nephrectomy for renal tumours in obese patients: Perioperative outcomes in a multi-institutional analysis

2015 ◽  
Vol 9 (11-12) ◽  
pp. 859 ◽  
Author(s):  
Newaj Abdullah ◽  
Deepansh Dalela ◽  
Ravi Barod ◽  
Jeff Larson ◽  
Michael Johnson ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Regression Analysis ◽  
Blood Loss ◽  
Partial Nephrectomy ◽  
Operative Time ◽  
Independent Predictor ◽  
Operating Time ◽  
Perioperative Outcomes ◽  
Robotic Partial Nephrectomy ◽  
Obese Patients ◽  
Estimated Blood Loss

<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>We sought to evaluate the association of obesity with surgical outcomes of robotic partial nephrectomy (RPN) using a large, multicentre database.<strong> </strong></p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We identified 1836 patients who underwent RPN from five academic centres from 2006-2014.  A total of 806 patients were obese (body mass index [BMI] ≥30 kg/m<sup>2</sup>). Patient characteristics and outcomes were compared between obese and non-obese patients. Multivariable analysis was used to assess the association of obesity on RPN outcomes.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 806 (44%) patients were obese with median BMI of 33.8kg/m<sup>2</sup>. Compared to non-obese patients, obese patients had greater median tumour size (2.9 vs. 2.5 cm, p&lt;0.001), mean RENAL nephrometry score (7.3 vs. 7.1, p = 0.04), median operating time (176 vs. 165 min, p=0.002), and median estimated blood loss (EBL, 150 vs. 100 ml, p=0.002), but no difference in complications. Obesity was not an independent predictor of operative time or EBL on regression analysis. Among obese patients, males had a greater EBL (150 vs. 100 ml, p&lt;0.001), operative time (180 vs. 166 min, p&lt;0.001) and warm ischemia time (WIT, 20 vs. 18, p=0.001) and male sex was an independent predictor of these outcomes on regression analysis.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>In this large, multicentre study on RPN, obesity was not associated with increased complications and was not an independent predictor of operating time or blood loss.  However, in obese patients, male gender was an independent predictor of greater EBL, operative time, and WIT.  Our results indicate that obesity alone should not preclude consideration for RPN.<strong></strong></p>

scholarly journals Comparison Robotic versus laparoscopic partial nephrectomy for Complex Renal Tumors (with a RENAL nephrometry score≥7): a meta-analysis

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yu-Li Jiang ◽  
Xin Xiao ◽  
Fu-Sheng Peng ◽  
Tian-Li Shi ◽  
Xiao-Hui Huang ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Partial Nephrectomy ◽  
Operating Time ◽  
Surgical Margin ◽  
Laparoscopic Partial Nephrectomy ◽  
Renal Tumors ◽  
Perioperative Outcomes ◽  
Robotic Partial Nephrectomy ◽  
Cochrane Central Register ◽  
Intraoperative Complication ◽  
Estimated Blood Loss

Abstract BackgroundTo compare the perioperative outcomes of Robotic partial nephrectomy (RPN) versus laparoscopic partial nephrectomy (LPN). MethodsWe searched PubMed, EMBASE and the Cochrane Central Register for studies from 2000 to 2020 to evaluate the perioperative outcomes RPN and LPN in patients with a RENALnephrometry score≥7. We used RevMan 5.2 to pool the data. ResultsSeven studies were acquired in our study. No significant differences were found in the estimated blood loss (WMD: WMD: 34.49, 95% CI -75.16-144.14, p=0.54), hospital stay (WMD: -0.59 95% CI -1.24–0.06, p=0.07), operating time (WMD: -22.45, 95%CI: -35.06 to-9.85, ), postive surgical margin (OR: 0.85, 95% CI 0.65–1.11, p =0.23) and transfusion (OR: 0.72, 95% CI 0.48–1.08, p =0.11).between the two groups. RPN get better outcomes in postoperative renal function (WMD: 3.32, 95% CI 0.73–5.91, p=0.01), warm ischenia time (WMD: -6.96, 95% CI -7.30–-6.62, p <0.0001), conversion( OR: 0.34, 95%CI: 0.17 to 0.66, p=0.002) and intraoperative complication (OR: 0.52, 95% CI 0.28–0.97, p=0.04).ConclusionRPN could get better perioerative clinical outcomes than LPN for treatment of Complex Renal Tumors( with a RENALnephrometry score≥7).

scholarly journals Predictive Factors for Postoperative Renal Function After Off-Clamp, Non-Renorrhaphy Partial Nephrectomy

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Masaki Nakamura ◽  
Shuji Kameyama ◽  
Taro Teshima ◽  
Yasushi Inoue ◽  
Tadashi Yoshimatsu ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Renal Function ◽  
Regression Analysis ◽  
Blood Loss ◽  
Partial Nephrectomy ◽  
Multivariate Regression ◽  
Independent Predictor ◽  
Multivariate Regression Analysis ◽  
Open Partial Nephrectomy ◽  
Estimated Blood Loss ◽  
Clinical Records

Abstract Background: There is limited information on perioperative renal function during off-clamp, non-renorrhaphy open partial nephrectomy.Therefore, this study aimed to clarify the chronological postoperative changes in renal function after off-clamp, non-renorrhaphy open partial nephrectomy.Methods: Clinical records of 138 patients with renal tumors who underwent off-clamp, non-renorrhaphy open partial nephrectomy at our institution were reviewed. Off-clamp, non-renorrhaphy partial nephrectomy were performed using a soft coagulation system. Perioperativeestimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) preservation was calculated, and predictors were identified using multivariate regression analysis at 5 days, 1 month, and 3 months after surgery.Results: The median operation time was 122 minutes, and the median volume of estimated blood loss was155 mL. The mean eGFR preservation at 5 days, 1 month, and 3 months after surgery was 95.3%, 91.0%, and 90.7%, respectively. Multivariate regression analysis revealed that estimated blood loss was an independent predictor of perioperative eGFR preservation at 5 days and 1 month after surgery, while age was an independent predictor of perioperative eGFR preservation at 3months after surgery.Conclusion: Chronological changes in renal function after off-clamp, non-renorrhaphy open partial nephrectomy have been reported.Ourresults could bea reference in the era of robot-assisted partial nephrectomy.

scholarly journals Association between R.E.N.A.L nephrometry score and perioperative outcomes following open partial nephrectomy under cold ischemia

2014 ◽  
Vol 8 (3-4) ◽  
pp. 137
Author(s):  
Dong Soo Park ◽  
Jin Ho Hwang ◽  
Moon Hyung Kang ◽  
Jong Jin Oh
Keyword(s):  
Blood Loss ◽  
Partial Nephrectomy ◽  
Perioperative Outcomes ◽  
Renal Neoplasm ◽  
Cold Ischemia ◽  
Ischemic Time ◽  
Open Partial Nephrectomy ◽  
Cold Ischemic Time ◽  
Nephrometry Score ◽  
Estimated Blood Loss

Introduction: We investigate the clinical significance of the R.E.N.A.L. nephrometry score for renal neoplasm following open partial nephrectomy (PN) under cold ischemia.Methods: A retrospective analysis was conducted using clinical data of 98 consecutive patients with clear cell renal cell carcinoma who underwent open PN by a single surgeon from December 2000 to September 2012. Tumour complexity was stratified into 3 categories: low (4-6), moderate (7-9) and high (10-12) complexity. Perioperative outcomes, such as complications, cold ischemic time, estimated blood loss and renal function, were analyzed according to the complexity by NS. Complications were stratified using the Clavien-Dindo classification system.Results: Tumour complexity according to nephrometry score was assessed as low in 16 (16.3%), moderate in 48 (49.0%) and high in 34 (34.7%). The median cold ischemic time did not differ significantly among the 3 groups (36.0 minutes in low-, 40 minutes in moderate- and 43 minutes in the high-complexity group, p = 0.421). Total complications did not differ significantly (2 (2.0%) in low, 4 (4.1%) in moderate and 4 (4.1%) in high, p = 0.984). Each Grade 3 complication occurred in the moderate (urine leakage) and high groups (lymphocele). Postoperative renal functional outcomes were similar among the groups (p = 0.729). Only mean estimated blood loss was significantly different with nephrometry score (p = 0.049).Conclusions: The nephrometry score, as used in an open PN series under cold ischemia, was not significantly associated with perioperative outcomes (i.e., ischemia time, complications, renal functional preservation).

scholarly journals Analysis of predictors of adherent perinephric fat and its impact on perioperative outcomes in laparoscopic partial nephrectomy: a retrospective case–control study

2021 ◽  
Vol 19 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Lu Fang ◽  
Huan Li ◽  
Tao Zhang ◽  
Rui Liu ◽  
Taotao Zhang ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Blood Loss ◽  
Partial Nephrectomy ◽  
Univariate Analysis ◽  
Warm Ischemia ◽  
Laparoscopic Partial Nephrectomy ◽  
Renal Tumors ◽  
Perioperative Outcomes ◽  
Transfusion Rate ◽  
Estimated Blood Loss ◽  
Perinephric Fat

Abstract Background Adherent perinephric fat (APF), characterized by inflammatory fat surrounding the kidney, can limit the isolation of renal tumors and increase the operative difficulty in laparoscopic partial nephrectomy (LPN). The aim of this study was to investigate the predictors of APF and its impact on perioperative outcomes during LPN. Methods A total of 215 consecutive patients undergoing LPN for renal cell carcinoma (RCC) from January 2017 to June 2019 at our institute were included. We divided these patients into two groups according to the presence of APF. Radiographic data were retrospectively collected from preoperative cross-sectional imaging. The perioperative clinical parameters were compared between the two groups. Univariate and multivariate analyses were performed to evaluate the predictive factors of APF. Results APF was identified in 41 patients (19.1%) at the time of LPN. Univariate analysis demonstrated that APF was significantly correlated with the male gender (P = 0.001), higher body mass index (P = 0.002), lower preoperative estimated glomerular filtration rate (P = 0.004), greater posterior perinephric fat thickness (P< 0.001), greater perinephric stranding (P< 0.001), and higher Mayo Adhesive Probability (MAP) score (P< 0.001). The MAP score (P< 0.001) was the only variable that remained an independent predictor for APF in multivariate analysis. We found that patients with APF had longer operative times (P< 0.001), warm ischemia times (P = 0.001), and greater estimated blood loss (P = 0.003) than those without APF. However, there were no significant differences in surgical approach, transfusion rate, length of postoperative stay, complication rate, or surgical margin between the two groups. Conclusions Several specific clinical and radiographic factors including the MAP score can predict APF. The presence of APF is associated with an increased operative time, warm ischemia time, and greater estimated blood loss but has no impact on other perioperative outcomes in LPN.

scholarly journals Early Single-Center Experience with Robotic Partial Nephrectomy Using the da Vinci Xi: Comparative Assessment with Conventional Open Partial Nephrectomy

2019 ◽  
Vol 13 (1) ◽  
pp. 13-18 ◽  
Author(s):  
Daisuke Motoyama ◽  
Ryota Aki ◽  
Yuto Matsushita ◽  
Keita Tamura ◽  
Toshiki Ito ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Partial Nephrectomy ◽  
Da Vinci ◽  
Operative Procedure ◽  
Surgical Margin ◽  
Perioperative Outcomes ◽  
Robotic Partial Nephrectomy ◽  
Da Vinci Xi ◽  
Ischemic Time ◽  
Open Partial Nephrectomy ◽  
Estimated Blood Loss

Background: The objective of this study was to evaluate our experience with robot-assisted partial nephrectomy (RAPN) in comparison with conventional open partial nephrectomy (OPN). Patients and Methods: This study included 37 and 50 patients undergoing OPN and RAPN for small renal masses, respectively. A single surgeon performed RAPN for all 50 cases using the da Vinci Xi. Trifecta was defined as satisfying all of the following 3 criteria: ischemic time of ≤ 25 minutes, negative surgical margin and no major postoperative complications. Results: After adjusting patient variables by 1:1 propensity-score matching, 37 patients were included in each group, and no significant differences in major clinicopathological characteristics were noted between these 2 groups. RAPN was significantly superior to OPN with respect to operative time, estimated blood loss and postoperative length of hospital stay. The rate of trifecta achievement was significantly higher in the RAPN group than in the OPN group (91.9 vs. 62.2%). Furthermore, the operative procedure and R.E.N.A.L. nephrometry score were found to be independently associated with trifecta outcome by multivariate analysis of the entire cohort. Conclusions: Although this is our early experience with 50 initial cases, RAPN using the da Vinci Xi resulted in more favorable perioperative outcomes than OPN.

The Self-Retaining Barbed Suture for Parenchymal Repair in Laparoscopic Partial Nephrectomy: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

2019 ◽  
Vol 26 (6) ◽  
pp. 744-752
Author(s):  
Hailun Zhan ◽  
Chunping Huang ◽  
Tengcheng Li ◽  
Fei Yang ◽  
Jiarong Cai ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Renal Function ◽  
Blood Loss ◽  
Hospital Stay ◽  
Partial Nephrectomy ◽  
Operative Time ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Length Of Hospital Stay ◽  
The Self ◽  
Barbed Suture ◽  
Estimated Blood Loss

Objectives. The warm ischemia time (WIT) is key to successful laparoscopic partial nephrectomy (LPN). The aim of this study was to perform a meta-analysis comparing the self-retaining barbed suture (SRBS) with a non-SRBS for parenchymal repair during LPN. Methods. A systematic search of PubMed, Scopus, and the Cochrane Library was performed up to March 2018. Inclusion criteria for this study were randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and observational comparative studies assessing the SRBS and non-SRBS for parenchymal repair during LPN. Outcomes of interest included WIT, complications, overall operative time, estimated blood loss, length of hospital stay, and change of renal function. Results. One RCT and 7 retrospective studies were identified, which included a total of 461 cases. Compared with the non-SRBS, use of the SRBS for parenchymal repair during LPN was associated with shorter WIT ( P < .00001), shorter overall operative time ( P < .00001), lower estimated blood loss ( P = .02), and better renal function preservation ( P = .001). There was no significant difference between the SRBS and non-SRBS with regard to complications ( P = .08) and length of hospital stay ( P = .25). Conclusions. The SRBS for parenchymal repair during LPN can significantly shorten the WIT and overall operative time, decrease blood loss, and preserve renal function.

scholarly journals Effect of preoperative biliary drainage in patients with moderately severe obstructive jaundice on the outcomes of pancreatoduodenectomy: A meta-analysis study

2019 ◽  
Author(s):  
Xiaolei Wang ◽  
Shanshan Meng ◽  
Yaowei Hu ◽  
Kehang Duan ◽  
Feng Wei
Keyword(s):  
Blood Loss ◽  
Total Bilirubin ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Operating Time ◽  
Preoperative Biliary Drainage ◽  
Postoperative Hospital Stay ◽  
Mean Difference ◽  
Perioperative Outcomes ◽  
Perioperative Mortality ◽  
Estimated Blood Loss

Abstract Background The purpose of this meta-analysis was to examine the impact of preoperative biliary drainage (PBD) on the perioperative outcomes of pancreatoduodenectomy (PD) in patients with total bilirubin >100 umol/L.Methods In this meta-analysis, studies that compared the perioperative outcomes of PBD and non-PBD patients with total bilirubin >100 umol/L, and were published in EMBASE, PubMed, the Cochrane library, Web of Science, VIP database, Wanfang data, Chinese biomedical literature and CNKI database from inception up to October 2019 were included. The odds ratios (OR) or mean differences were calculated with 95% confidence intervals (CI).Results Nine trials with 744 patients, which compared PBD (267 patients) with non-PBD (477 patients), were included. There was no significant difference in perioperative mortality between these two groups (OR: 0.51, 95% CI: 0.19 to 1.39; P =0.19). Postoperative hospital stay (mean difference: -2.35, 95% CI: -3.70 to -1.00; P =0.0007), operating time (mean difference: -33.03, 95% CI: -44.14 to 21.93; P <0.00001), estimated blood loss (mean difference: -141.18, 95% CI: -213.25 to -69.11; P =0.0001) and overall morbidity (OR: 0.68, CI: 0.48 to 0.95; P =0.02) were significantly lower in the PBD group than in the non-PBD group.Conclusion Patients who received PBD had similar perioperative mortality, but had decreased postoperative hospital stay, operating time, estimated blood loss and overall morbidity, when compared to patients without PBD. Therefore, PBD should be routinely performed for patients planned for PD with a total bilirubin of >100 umol/L.

Safety and Efficacy of Laparoscopic Liver Resection for Colorectal Liver Metastasis With Obesity

2020 ◽  
pp. 000313482095244
Author(s):  
Yoshihiro Inoue ◽  
Masatsugu Ishii ◽  
Kensuke Fujii ◽  
Kentaro Nihei ◽  
Yusuke Suzuki ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Liver Resection ◽  
Blood Loss ◽  
Laparoscopic Liver Resection ◽  
Operative Time ◽  
Surgical Site Infections ◽  
Obese Patients ◽  
Visceral Fat Area ◽  
Safety And Efficacy ◽  
Estimated Blood Loss ◽  
Significant Difference

Introduction Laparoscopic liver resection (LLR) in obese patients has been reported to be particularly challenging owing to technical difficulties and various comorbidities. Methods The safety and efficacy outcomes in 314 patients who underwent laparoscopic or open nonanatomical liver resection for colorectal liver metastases (CRLM) were analyzed retrospectively with respect to the patients’ body mass index (BMI) and visceral fat area (VFA). Results Two hundred and four patients underwent LLR, and 110 patients underwent open liver resection (OLR). The rate of conversion from LLR to OLR was 4.4%, with no significant difference between the BMI and VFA groups ( P = .647 and .136, respectively). In addition, there were no significant differences in terms of operative time and estimated blood loss in LLR ( P = .226 and .368; .772 and .489, respectively). The incidence of Clavien-Dindo grade IIIa or higher complications was not significantly different between the BMI and VFA groups of LLR ( P = .877 and .726, respectively). In obese patients, the operative time and estimated blood loss were significantly shorter and lower, respectively, in LLR than in OLR ( P = .003 and < .001; < .001 and < .001, respectively). There was a significant difference in the incidence of postoperative complications, organ/space surgical site infections, and postoperative bile leakage between the LLR and OLR groups ( P = .017, < .001, and < .001, respectively). Conclusion LLR for obese patients with CRLM can be performed safely using various surgical devices with no major difference in outcomes compared to those in nonobese patients. Moreover, LLR has better safety outcomes than OLR in obese patients.

Robotic and Laparoscopic Approaches for Adrenal Surgery in Obese Patients

2020 ◽  
pp. 000313482095149
Author(s):  
Hosam Shalaby ◽  
Mohamed Abdelgawad ◽  
Mahmoud Omar, MD ◽  
Ghassan Zora, MD ◽  
Saad Alawwad ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Blood Loss ◽  
Hospital Stay ◽  
Operative Time ◽  
Laparoscopic Approach ◽  
Obese Patients ◽  
Adrenal Surgery ◽  
Robotic Approach ◽  
Robot Assisted ◽  
Operative Outcomes ◽  
Estimated Blood Loss

Objective Minimally invasive adrenalectomy is a challenging procedure in obese patients. Few recent studies have advocated against robot-assisted adrenalectomy, particularly in obese patients. This study aims to compare operative outcomes between the robotic and laparoscopic adrenalectomy, particularly in obese patients. Materials and Methods A retrospective analysis was performed on all consecutive patients undergoing adrenalectomy for benign disease by a single surgeon using either a laparoscopic or robotic approach. Adrenal surgeries for adrenal cancer were excluded. Demographics, operative time, length of hospital stays, estimated blood loss (EBL), and intraoperative and postoperative complications were evaluated. Patients were divided into 2 groups; obese and nonobese. A sub-analysis was performed comparing robotic and laparoscopic approaches in obese and nonobese patients. Results Out of 120, 55 (45.83%) were obese (body mass index ≥ 30 kg/m2). 14 (25.45%) of the obese patients underwent a laparoscopic approach, and 41 (74.55%) underwent a robotic approach. Operative times were longer in the obese vs. nonobese groups (173.30 ± 72.90 minutes and 148.20 ± 61.68 minutes, P = .04) and were associated with less EBL (53.77 ± 82.48 vs. 101.30 ± 122, P = .01). The robotic approach required a longer operative time when compared to the laparoscopic approach (187 ± 72.42 minutes vs. 126.60 ± 54.55 minutes, P = .0102) in the obese but was associated with less blood loss (29.02 ± 51.05 mL vs. 138.30 ± 112.20 mL, P < .01) and shorter hospital stay (1.73 ± 1.23 days vs. 3.17 ± 1.27 days, P < .001). Conclusion Robot-assisted adrenal surgery is safe in obese patients and appears to be longer; however, it provides improvements in postoperative outcomes, including EBL and shorter hospital stay.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document