scholarly journals Abnormal First And Second Trimester Matenal Seum Marker Levels For Aneuploidy Screening And Adverse Pregnancy Outcomes

2021 ◽  
Vol 26 (3) ◽  
pp. 418-425
Author(s):  
Lale Susan Turkgeldi ◽  
Engin Turkgeldi ◽  
Huseyin Kiyak ◽  
NEŞE YÜCEL
2020 ◽  
Vol 0 (0) ◽  
Author(s):  
Tanapak Wisetmongkolchai ◽  
Fuanglada Tongprasert ◽  
Kasemsri Srisupundit ◽  
Suchaya Luewan ◽  
Kuntharee Traisrisilp ◽  
...  

AbstractObjectivesTo compare the rate of fetal loss in pregnancy after second trimester amniocentesis between procedures performed by experts and non-experts and to assess other pregnancy complications as secondary outcomes.MethodsA retrospective cohort study was performed on singleton pregnancies that underwent mid-trimester amniocenteses in a single institution. The fetal loss rates of procedures performed by experts and non-experts were collected and analyzed. Other adverse pregnancy outcomes were also examined.ResultsIn total, 14,450 amniocenteses were performed during the study period. These included 11,357 (78.6%) procedures in the group expert operators and 3,093 (21.4%) procedures in the group non-expert operators. In the non-expert group, the fetal loss rate was slightly increased but not significantly (p=0.24).In addition, the higher number of spontaneous abortions was associated with blood-stained amniotic fluid sample (p<0.001; RR=9.28). Multiple needle insertions also increased in the non-expert group significantly. However, no difference in pregnancy outcomes was found between in single and multiple needle insertions.ConclusionsThe amniocentesis procedures performed by the non-experts was not increase the fetal loss rate. However, the other adverse pregnancy outcomes, including preterm birth, low birth weight and fetal growth restriction were significantly increased in the non-expert group.


2011 ◽  
Vol 31 (10) ◽  
pp. 995-998 ◽  
Author(s):  
Vajiheh Marsoosi ◽  
Reihaneh Pirjani ◽  
Ashraf Jamal ◽  
Laleh Eslamian ◽  
Abbas Rahimi-Foroushani

2015 ◽  
Vol 29 (13) ◽  
pp. 2093-2097 ◽  
Author(s):  
Thaniyaporn Settiyanan ◽  
Chanane Wanapirak ◽  
Supatra Sirichotiyakul ◽  
Fuanglada Tongprasert ◽  
Kasemsri Srisupundit ◽  
...  

2017 ◽  
Vol 45 (7) ◽  
Author(s):  
Karolina Bartkute ◽  
Dalia Balsyte ◽  
Josef Wisser ◽  
Juozas Kurmanavicius

AbstractAim:The aim of this study was to evaluate the predictive value of α-fetoprotein in maternal serum (MS-AFP) as a marker for diverse pregnancy outcomes.Methods:The study was based on pregnancy and delivery data from 5520 women between 1999 and 2014 at University Hospital of Zurich (UHZ). Inclusion criteria: both MS-AFP and pregnancy outcome were known for the same pregnancy. Pregnancy outcomes and characteristics such as fetal malformation, intrauterine fetal death (IUFD) and intrauterine growth retardation as well as maternal age, weight before pregnancy, gestational age (GA) at delivery, newborn weight, length and head circumference were analyzed with respect to the MS-AFP value. MS-AFP value was categorized into three groups: elevated MS-AFP>2.5 multiples of the median (MoM), normal 0.5–2.49 MoM and decreased <0.5 MoM.Results:Newborn weight (g) and length (cm) were significantly lower in the elevated MS-AFP (P<0.001) group, and infants had 1 week lower GA at delivery (P<0.05). In the group of elevated MS-AFP (n=46), 26.1% of pregnancies were significantly related to adverse pregnancy outcomes, such as fetal malformations, fetuses small for gestational age (SGA) and IUFD. Adverse pregnancy outcomes of 5.6% were registered in the group of normal MS-AFP and 7.3% in the group of low MS-AFP (P<0.05).Conclusion:MS-AFP level in the second trimester is still an important indicator of fetal surface malformations; however, ultrasound still outweighs as a screening method. Nevertheless, pregnant women with elevated MS-AFP values and with no sonographically detected fetal malformations should additionally receive the third trimester ultrasound examination to exclude other possible complications of pregnancy.


2015 ◽  
Vol 212 (1) ◽  
pp. S246-S247
Author(s):  
Jonathan Rosner ◽  
Andrei Rebarber ◽  
Daniel Saltzman ◽  
Chad Klauser ◽  
Nathan Fox ◽  
...  

2017 ◽  
Vol 42 (4) ◽  
pp. 285-293 ◽  
Author(s):  
Enav Yefet ◽  
Olga Kuzmin ◽  
Naama Schwartz ◽  
Flora Basson ◽  
Zohar Nachum

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document