scholarly journals Phasic alertness indicated by simple motor reaction time in late childhood: The effect of age and sex

Acta Gymnica ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 51 ◽  
Author(s):  
Rudolf Psotta ◽  
Josef Kraus ◽  
Milada Krejčí ◽  
Grzegorz Juras
1990 ◽  
Vol 52 (1) ◽  
pp. 28-34 ◽  
Author(s):  
Piotr Jaśkowski ◽  
Antoni Pruszewicz ◽  
Piotr Świdzinski

1996 ◽  
Vol 82 (3) ◽  
pp. 707-730 ◽  
Author(s):  
Piotr Jaśkowski

Simple motor reaction time and judgment of temporal order are commonly recognized as two methods for estimation of perceptual latency. Unfortunately, the results obtained by the methods under the same conditions do not agree. We review hypotheses attempting to explain the disagreement. Although some of these seem to be promising, no one at present could be fully accepted.


2000 ◽  
Vol 36 (1) ◽  
pp. 35-44 ◽  
Author(s):  
Gary C Galbraith ◽  
Bryan C Chae ◽  
Jason R Cooper ◽  
Mark M Gindi ◽  
Timothy N Ho ◽  
...  

NeuroImage ◽  
2009 ◽  
Vol 47 ◽  
pp. S155
Author(s):  
Oliver Hinds ◽  
Todd Thompson ◽  
Susa Whitfield-Gabrieli ◽  
Chri Triantafyllou ◽  
John Gabrieli

GYMNASIUM ◽  
2017 ◽  
Vol XVII (2) ◽  
Author(s):  
Henrieta Hornigova ◽  
Ladislava Dolezajova ◽  
Jaromir Sedlacek ◽  
Peter Sagat ◽  
Gheorghe Balint

In the sport performance structure of table tennis is sensor motor reaction time one of the most important factors for reaching top-level results, both in males and females groups. In this research we watched 23 female table tennis players from Slovakia; 9 mini cadets (12-13 years), 6 cadets (14-15 years) and 8 juniors (16-18 years). Girls were tested by modified agility test for table tennis players (Vacenovsky & Vencurik, 2013) with machine FITRO Agility check. Thus we gained their sensor motor reaction times. By Mann-Whitney U-test we studied differences between age categories, upper and lower extremities, dominant (forehand) and un-dominant (backhand) side, right and left-handed players. We used significance level p<0.05. In our research we did not confirm expected results that the older groups have shorter sensor motor reaction time. We also expected shorter reaction time of upper extremities comparing lower extremities; this was confirmed, though there was found statistical significant difference only in juniors group. Groups of mini-cadets and cadets have better (shorter) sensor motor reaction time from backhand side, while group of junior is better from forehand side. We also confirmed that left-handed players have slightly shorter reaction time.


2019 ◽  
Vol 19 (6) ◽  
pp. 1038-1051
Author(s):  
F. Moya-Vergara ◽  
D. Curotto-Berruezo ◽  
P. Valladares-Arellano ◽  
E. Arriaza-Ardiles ◽  
T. Valverde-Esteve ◽  
...  

1978 ◽  
Vol 4 (5) ◽  
pp. 377-387 ◽  
Author(s):  
Paul E. Panek ◽  
Gerald V. Barrett ◽  
Harvey L. Sterns ◽  
Ralph A. Alexander

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document