The role of health economics research in implementation research for health systems strengthening [State of the art series. Operational research. Number 6 in the series]

2011 ◽  
Vol 15 (6) ◽  
pp. 715-721 ◽  
Author(s):  
G. H. Mann ◽  
R. Thomson ◽  
C. Jin ◽  
M. Phiri ◽  
M. C. Vater ◽  
...  
2021 ◽  
Vol 17 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Kristen Meagher ◽  
Bothaina Attal ◽  
Preeti Patel

Abstract Background The ripple effects of protracted armed conflicts include: significant gender-specific barriers to accessing essential services such as health, education, water and sanitation and broader macroeconomic challenges such as increased poverty rates, higher debt burdens, and deteriorating employment prospects. These factors influence the wider social and political determinants of health for women and a gendered analysis of the political economy of health in conflict may support strengthening health systems during conflict. This will in turn lead to equality and equity across not only health, but broader sectors and systems, that contribute to sustainable peace building. Methods The methodology employed is a multidisciplinary narrative review of the published and grey literature on women and gender in the political economy of health in conflict. Results The existing literature that contributes to the emerging area on the political economy of health in conflict has overlooked gender and specifically the role of women as a critical component. Gender analysis is incorporated into existing post-conflict health systems research, but this does not extend to countries actively affected by armed conflict and humanitarian crises. The analysis also tends to ignore the socially constructed patriarchal systems, power relations and gender norms that often lead to vastly different health system needs, experiences and health outcomes. Conclusions Detailed case studies on the gendered political economy of health in countries impacted by complex protracted conflict will support efforts to improve health equity and understanding of gender relations that support health systems strengthening.


2014 ◽  
Vol 44 (2) ◽  
pp. 323-335 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mary Anne Mercer ◽  
Susan M. Thompson ◽  
Rui Maria de Araujo

2011 ◽  
Vol 27 (4) ◽  
pp. 205-210
Author(s):  
Alexander E.T. Finlayson ◽  
Jorge Zeron ◽  
Luke Beaumont ◽  
Jibril Handuleh ◽  
Andy Leather

2020 ◽  
Vol 35 (Supplement_2) ◽  
pp. ii137-ii149
Author(s):  
Kim Ozano ◽  
Laura Dean ◽  
Oluwatosin Adekeye ◽  
Anthony K Bettee ◽  
Ruth Dixon ◽  
...  

Abstract Global health gains can be achieved through strengthening health systems to identify and address implementation challenges in low- and middle-income countries. Participatory research, that promotes joint problem and solution finding between communities and different health systems actors, supports policy implementation analysis at all levels. Within the neglected tropical disease programmes in Liberia and Nigeria, we applied participatory action research (PAR) to address programmatic and health system bottlenecks with health systems strengthening embedded. This paper shares learning from 20 interviews with co-researchers, from national and sub-national levels and academic researchers who worked collaboratively to understand challenges, co-create solutions and advocate for policy change. Through analysis and reflections of existing PAR principles, we inductively identified five additional guiding principles for quality, ethical standards and ongoing learning within PAR projects that aim to strengthen health systems. (1) Recognize communities as units of identity and define stakeholder participation to ensure equitable engagement of all actors; (2) enable flexible action planning that builds on existing structures whilst providing opportunities for embedding change; (3) address health systems and research power differentials that can impede co-production of knowledge and solution development; (4) embed relational practices that lead to new political forms of participation and inquiry within health systems and (5) develop structures for ongoing learning at multiple levels of the health system. PAR can strengthen health systems by connecting and co-creating potentially sustainable solutions to implementation challenges. Additional research to explore how these five additional principles can support the attainment of quality and ethical standards within implementation research using a PAR framework for health systems strengthening is needed.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document