Comparative study of education for students with special needs in Japan and Poland

2017 ◽  
Vol LXXVIII (1) ◽  
pp. 28-40
Author(s):  
Manabu Kuroda ◽  
Ewa Kulesza

The purpose of this article is to present trends in educational policy and the problems of education for students with special needs through a comparative study of Japan and Poland. It presents a brief history of special education, regulations on the school system, groups of students with special needs and the features of the current system of education for students with special needs in both countries under comparison. The conclusion points to positive changes and those aspects of Polish and Japanese education and public policy toward people with special needs that should be altered.

1990 ◽  
Vol 13 (2) ◽  
pp. 28-38
Author(s):  
Dianne Snow

The history of special education is conceived within the integration debate in a way which lends credibility to two broad claims. The first is that governments have been lax in providing educational facilities for children with disabilities, while the second comprises an argument for shifting definitional control of the notion of ‘disability’ from the medical to the educational arena. The recent Report to the Australian Schools Commission on Integration in Australia exemplifies this stance by pointing to the initial reluctance of governments to assume responsibility for educating children with special needs, followed by their eventual involvement in establishing segregated educational facilities. With segregated schooling becoming the norm, the problem now confronting educators is how to integrate these students and their supporting resources into the regular school system.


Author(s):  
Pam L. Epler

This chapter will inform early-career general education teachers on a broad spectrum of special needs topics. The chapter begins with an overview of the history of special education and describes how many facets of special needs education—such as how to classify and how best to instruct special needs students—are still controversial. It then segues into a discussion of various educational service delivery models in which special education students can be educated depending on their needs. The chapter also identifies characteristics and learning traits of special needs students. Next, it presents a detailed section of specific instructional strategies that both general education and special education instructors will find useful to implement when teaching students with special needs. Finally, a brief overview discounting many of the myths about special education is presented.


2021 ◽  
Vol 97 (2) ◽  
pp. 219-233
Author(s):  
Matthias Erhardt

Abstract Separation as an Aid? Considerations on Inclusion and Exclusion in the School System against the Background of the Historical Development of Special Needs Schools This article looks into the connections between special needs schools and mainstream schools regarding the homogeneity and heterogeneity of the students. First of all, the current school structure effects are discussed. Then it is shown which line of tradition opens up the history of the so called auxiliary school with regard to inclusion and exclusion and which consequences result from taking the well-being of the child seriously.


Šolsko polje ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol XXXI (1-2) ◽  
pp. 167-189
Author(s):  
Matej Rovšek

Between equity, quality and learning achievements in primary school One of the features of Slovenian primary school system is the parallelism of two groups of schools – regular ones and those for certain groups of students with special needs. This makes us one of the few countries (EASIE, 2018) to still have completely separated schools for just over 2% of students with special needs. Despite the fact that both types comprise the same educational system, which is, in most aspects, regulated by the same law, some groups of students with special needs do not have the possibility of schooling under the same roof. However, this is only a part of the topic we are going to discuss. The other one tackles the question of equity of schooling in regular schools – besides all other students, this mostly concerns those with special needs, those with mild intellectual abilities, Roma students as well as those with low socio-economic standards (SES). The equity of the Slovenian school system will be discussed in a wider context, not only in the case of gender, SES and nationality comparing learning achievements. The article is based on the assumption that the regular school of today is not adjusted to the developmental needs of most students. For the purpose of discussion, elements which comprise the school system, must be defined: some are either of systemic or curricular, or conceptual or pedagogic nature, such as: curriculum, standards of knowledge, different forms of internal and external assessment, placement of children with special needs etc. Despite all of these elements compromising to make a stable schooling system, they are not all coherent with the needs of today’s modern society and are, even more so, in contrast with the results of the neuro-science in education. Another category of equal opportunities within the question of school equity would, besides the SES, nationality and ethnicity, have to be that of different capabilities of students, regarding the unified (official) standards of knowledge. All of these elements also make it difficult for today’s school to become a school of diversity. A school which will support different students, regardless of their learning achievements, SES and other characteristics. A school where all the students could be successfully educated, those who are already in the regular schools as well as those who are still part of the segregated forms of education. The article will depict why the present school system is no longer suitable for the majority of students and will point to possible solutions. The key solution touches on the changes of curriculums and the concept of assessment, the changes of which also have an impact on all the other elements. The assumptions will be clarified by studying the connection of stated elements and data of the international studies such as the TIMSS and PISA study from 2018 and earlier as well as using other actual Slovenian studies. Key words: equity in education, children with special needs, curriculum, minimum standards of knowledge, assessments, learning achievements, cognitive science


1974 ◽  
Vol 8 (2) ◽  
pp. 247-261 ◽  
Author(s):  
E. Patricia Tsurumi

George Sansom once called the history of education in late nine-teenth-century Japan ‘a useful example of a reaction against foreign influence and a return to tradition in the midst of a strenuous process of “modernization”.’ Sansom and others have depicted Japanese education during the first three decades of the Meiji period (1868–1912) as follows: during the 1870s Japanese education was completely dominated by the Western philosophies and principles which were flooding a country newly opened to foreign intercourse after two and one-half centuries of isolation. This extreme Westernization led to a ‘conservative reaction’ in government and education circles during the 1880s. This, in turn, culminated in the Imperial Rescript on Education of 1890 and the emphasis on ‘traditional’ moral education which was the hallmark of schooling in the 1890S. This shift in educational policy on the part of the Meiji government has been seen as ‘part of the general swing during the 1880s away from unnecessarily close imitation of the West and back towards more traditional values.’


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document