scholarly journals Discharge destination and patient‐reported outcomes after inpatient treatment for isolated lower limb fractures

Author(s):  
Lara A Kimmel ◽  
Jessica Kasza ◽  
Belinda J Gabbe
2020 ◽  
Vol 212 (6) ◽  
pp. 263-270 ◽  
Author(s):  
Lara A Kimmel ◽  
Pamela M Simpson ◽  
Anne E Holland ◽  
Elton R Edwards ◽  
Peter A Cameron ◽  
...  

2020 ◽  
Vol 17 ◽  
pp. 91-96 ◽  
Author(s):  
Dilraj Singh Bhullar ◽  
Saravana Vail Karuppiah ◽  
Ahmed Aljawadi ◽  
Tess Gillham ◽  
Omar Fakih ◽  
...  

2014 ◽  
Vol 94 (7) ◽  
pp. 1005-1013 ◽  
Author(s):  
Lara A. Kimmel ◽  
Anne E. Holland ◽  
Pam M. Simpson ◽  
Elton R. Edwards ◽  
Belinda J. Gabbe

Background Early, accurate prediction of discharge destination from the acute hospital assists individual patients and the wider hospital system. The Trauma Rehabilitation and Prediction Tool (TRaPT), developed using registry data, determines probability of inpatient rehabilitation discharge for patients with isolated lower limb fractures. Objective The aims of this study were: (1) to prospectively validatate the TRaPT, (2) to assess whether its performance could be improved by adding additional demographic data, and (3) to simplify it for use as a bedside tool. Design This was a cohort, measurement-focused study. Methods Patients with isolated lower limb fractures (N=114) who were admitted to a major trauma center in Melbourne, Australia, were included. The participants' TRaPT scores were calculated from admission data. Performance of the TRaPT score alone, and in combination with frailty, weight-bearing status, and home supports, was assessed using measures of discrimination and calibration. A simplified TRaPT was developed by rounding the coefficients of variables in the original model and grouping age into 8 categories. Simplified TRaPT performance measures, including specificity, sensitivity, and positive and negative predictive values, were evaluated. Results Prospective validation of the TRaPT showed excellent discrimination (C-statistic=0.90 [95% confidence interval=0.82, 0.97]), a sensitivity of 80%, and specificity of 94%. All participants able to weight bear were discharged directly home. Simplified TRaPT scores had a sensitivity of 80% and a specificity of 88%. Limitations Generalizability may be limited given the compensation system that exists in Australia, but the methods used will assist in designing a similar tool in any population. Conclusions The TRaPT accurately predicted discharge destination for 80% of patients and may form a useful aid for discharge decision making, with the simplified version facilitating its use as a bedside tool.


2021 ◽  
Vol 22 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Ian Pallister ◽  
Gregory Jack Handley ◽  
Sharon Maggs ◽  
Ann-Marie Davies ◽  
Amanda Kyle ◽  
...  

Abstract Background Open lower limb fractures are serious injuries requiring combined ortho-plastic surgery and have significantly worse outcomes than similar closed fractures. There is little objective published data to determine which functional outcome measures best reflect progress or completeness of physical recovery. Our hypothesis was that objective measures combining strength, mobility and balance would better reflect recovery than isolated parameters (e.g. range of motion ROM) and would compare well to patients’ perceived recovery. Methods Adult open lower limb fracture patients were reviewed 6 and 12 weeks, 6, 9 and 12 months post-injury. The mechanism, injury pattern, age, gender and treatment were recorded. Isolated parameter objective functional outcome measures (OFOMs) (ROM and MRC strength grade) were compared to combined OFOMs (timed up and go, comfortable gait speed and fast gait speed, Edgren Side Step Test (TUAG, CGS, FGS, ESST) and Single Leg balance. Patient reported outcomes were recorded (Global Perceived Effect (GPE) score and Disability Rating Index (DRI)). Statistical analysis used non-parametric tests (e.g. Spearman correlation) compared each with time since injury. Results Sixty-eight patients (54 male) with a median age of 45(20–75) years. Of the 19 isolated OFOMs, only knee flexion and ankle plantar flexion ROM and strength improved with time (Spearman correlation p = 0.042, 0.008, 0.032, 0.036 respectively). TUAG, ESST, CGS, FGS and GPE scores showed significant improvement (Spearman correlation p < 0.001). Patients’ estimation of recovery paralleled these measures (Spearman correlation p < 0.001) with all but 2 patients achieving the minimum clinical important difference in DRI by 12 months compared to baseline. However, the GPE score had a higher proportion of improving responses than DRI at each time-point. Discussion Functional recovery is a key determinant in patients returning to work, providing for themselves and their family or resuming independent living for older patients. This study has demonstrated time-related improvements in combined OFOMs measuring mobility, strength, agility and balance paralleling patients’ perception of recovery in the 12 months after open lower limb fractures. Over the same time-frame, the simple GPE score compared favourably with the DRI. Such parameters could become part of a defined core outcomes set. Focussing rehabilitation towards these combined OFOMs may help hasten recovery. Trial registration South West Wales REC 06/WMW02/10).


2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ylenia Colella ◽  
Arianna Scala ◽  
Chiara De Lauri ◽  
Francesco Bruno ◽  
Giuseppe Cesarelli ◽  
...  

Author(s):  
J. Mingo-Robinet ◽  
J.A. Alonso ◽  
M. Moreno-Barrero ◽  
L. González-García ◽  
V. Garcia-Virto ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document