Prevalence and associations of gender concordance in general practice consultations: a cross-sectional analysis.

2015 ◽  
Vol 3 (4) ◽  
pp. 470 ◽  
Author(s):  
Allison Thomson ◽  
Simon Morgan ◽  
Amanda Tapley ◽  
Mike Van Driel ◽  
Kim Henderson ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
General Practice ◽  
Female Physician ◽  
Gender Effects ◽  
Male Physician ◽  
Cross Sectional ◽  
Cross Sectional Analysis ◽  
Gender Concordance ◽  
And Gender ◽  
Sectional Analysis ◽  
Physician Patient

Rationale, aims and objectives: Gender effects on physician-patient interactions are well-established and gender concordance of the physician-patient dyad influences consultation dynamics, person-centeredness and outcomes. We aimed to establish the prevalence and associations of gender-concordant and gender-discordant consultations of general practice (family medicine) trainees and to compare outcomes of gender-concordant and gender-discordant consultations.Method: A cross-sectional analysis from an ongoing cohort study. The outcome measure was whether a consultation included a gender concordant (female-female, male-male) or discordant (male-female, female-male) physician-patient dyad. Independent variables related to patient, physician (registrar), practice, consultation content and consultation outcome.Results: Five hundred and ninety-two general practice (GP) registrars (trainees) in 4 of Australia’s 17 regional training programs provided data on 56,234 individual consultations. Sixty-two point nine percent of consultations were gender-concordant (73.5% female-female, 26.5% male-male) and 37.1% were gender-discordant (47.0% male physician-female patient, 53% female physician-male patient). Associations of having a gender-concordant consultation were patient female gender and younger age (<55), the patient not being new to the registrar and the registrar being part-time, younger and having worked at the practice previously. Addressing a reproductive/contraceptive/ genital problem was associated with gender concordance. Gender-concordant consultations were  ‘complex’: significantly longer than gender-discordant consultations, addressed a greater number of problems, resulted in more pathology ordered, more follow-up organised and more learning goals generated.Conclusions: Gender-concordant consultations may be more complex and gender-concordance is ‘sought’ by patients rather than being random.  Thus, efforts could be made in general practice to provide access to both male and female GPs, especially for female patients or groups or patients with particular needs. 

General practice registrars’ clinical exposure to dermatological procedures during general practice training: a cross-sectional analysis

2018 ◽  
Vol 29 (6) ◽  
pp. 357-366 ◽  
Author(s):  
Er Tsing Vivian Tng ◽  
Amanda Tapley ◽  
Andrew Davey ◽  
Sally De Zwaan ◽  
Simon Morgan ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
General Practice ◽  
Cross Sectional ◽  
Clinical Exposure ◽  
Cross Sectional Analysis ◽  
Sectional Analysis ◽  
General Practice Training

scholarly journals Responses to clinical uncertainty in Australian general practice trainees: a cross-sectional analysis

2017 ◽  
Vol 51 (12) ◽  
pp. 1277-1288 ◽  
Author(s):  
Georga Cooke ◽  
Amanda Tapley ◽  
Elizabeth Holliday ◽  
Simon Morgan ◽  
Kim Henderson ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
General Practice ◽  
Cross Sectional ◽  
Clinical Uncertainty ◽  
Cross Sectional Analysis ◽  
Australian General Practice ◽  
Sectional Analysis

scholarly journals Australian general practice trainees’ exposure to ophthalmic problems and implications for training: a cross-sectional analysis

2016 ◽  
Vol 8 (4) ◽  
pp. 295 ◽  
Author(s):  
Simon Morgan ◽  
Amanda Tapley ◽  
Kim M Henderson ◽  
Neil A Spike ◽  
Lawrie A McArthur ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
General Practice ◽  
Information Seeking ◽  
Learning Goals ◽  
Training Methods ◽  
Cross Sectional ◽  
Cross Sectional Analysis ◽  
Australian General Practice ◽  
Simple Logistic ◽  
Sectional Analysis

ABSTRACT INTRODUCTION Eye conditions are common presentations in Australian general practice, with the potential for serious sequelae. Pre-vocational ophthalmology training for General Practitioner (GP) trainees is limited. AIM To describe the rate, nature and associations of ophthalmic problems managed by Australian GP trainees, and derive implications for education and training. METHODS Cross-sectional analysis from an ongoing cohort study of GP trainees’ clinical consultations. Trainees recorded demographic, clinical and educational details of consecutive patient consultations. Descriptive analyses report trainee, patient and practice demographics. Proportions of all problems managed in these consultations that were ophthalmology-related were calculated with 95% confidence intervals (CI). Associations were tested using simple logistic regression within the generalised estimating equations (GEE) framework. RESULTS In total, 884 trainees returned data on 184,476 individual problems or diagnoses from 118,541 encounters. There were 2649 ophthalmology-related problems, equating to 1.4% (95% CI: 1.38–1.49) of all problems managed. The most common eye presentations were conjunctivitis (32.5% of total problems), eyelid problems (14.9%), foreign body (5.3%) and dry eye (4.7%). Statistically significant associations were male trainee; male patient and patient aged 14 years or under; the problem being new and the patient being new to both trainee and practice; urban and of higher socioeconomic status practice location; the practice nurse not being involved; planned follow up not arranged; referral made; in-consultation information sought; and learning goals generated. DISCUSSION Trainees have comparable ophthalmology exposure to established GPs. However, associations with referral and information-seeking suggest GP trainees find ophthalmic problems challenging, reinforcing the critical importance of appropriate training.

scholarly journals Specificity of early-career general practitioners’ problem formulations in patients presenting with dizziness: a cross-sectional analysis

2021 ◽  
Vol 9 (4) ◽  
pp. e001087
Author(s):  
Jocelyn Ledger ◽  
Amanda Tapley ◽  
Christopher Levi ◽  
Andrew Davey ◽  
Mieke van Driel ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
General Practice ◽  
Cohort Study ◽  
Multivariable Analysis ◽  
Cross Sectional ◽  
Specific Symptom ◽  
Cross Sectional Analysis ◽  
Problem Formulations ◽  
Sectional Analysis ◽  
General Practice Training ◽  
Gp Training

ObjectivesDizziness is a common and challenging clinical presentation in general practice. Failure to determine specific aetiologies can lead to significant morbidity and mortality. We aimed to establish frequency and associations of general practitioner (GP) trainees’ (registrars’) specific vertigo provisional diagnoses and their non-specific symptomatic problem formulations.DesignA cross-sectional analysis of Registrar Clinical Encounters in Training (ReCEnT) cohort study data between 2010 and 2018. ReCEnT is an ongoing, prospective cohort study of registrars in general practice training in Australia. Data collection occurs once every 6 months midtraining term (for three terms) and entails recording details of 60 consecutive clinical consultations on hardcopy case report forms. The outcome factor was whether dizziness-related or vertigo-related presentations resulted in a specific vertigo provisional diagnosis versus a non-specific symptomatic problem formulation. Associations with patient, practice, registrar and consultation independent variables were assessed by univariate and multivariable logistic regression.SettingAustralian general practice training programme. The training is regionalised and delivered by regional training providers (RTPs) (2010–2015) and regional training organisations (RTOs) (2016–2018) across Australia (from five states and one territory).ParticipantsAll general practice registrars enrolled with participating RTPs or RTOs undertaking GP training terms.Results2333 registrars (96% response rate) recorded 1734 new problems related to dizziness or vertigo. Of these, 546 (31.5%) involved a specific vertigo diagnosis and 1188 (68.5%) a non-specific symptom diagnosis. Variables associated with a non-specific symptom diagnosis on multivariable analysis were lower socioeconomic status of the practice location (OR 0.94 for each decile of disadvantage, 95% CIs 0.90 to 0.98) and longer consultation duration (OR 1.02, 95% CIs 1.00 to 1.04). A specific vertigo diagnosis was associated with performing a procedure (OR 0.52, 95% CIs 0.27 to 1.00), with some evidence for seeking information from a supervisor being associated with a non-specific symptom diagnosis (OR 1.39, 95% CIs 0.92 to 2.09; p=0.12).ConclusionsAustralian GP registrars see dizzy patients as frequently as established GPs. The frequency and associations of a non-specific diagnosis are consistent with the acknowledged difficulty of making diagnoses in vertigo/dizziness presentations. Continuing emphasis on this area in GP training and encouragement of supervisor involvement in registrars’ diagnostic processes is indicated.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document