Die kartellrechtliche Beurteilung von Preisgleitklauseln als Ausprägung von Hub & Spoke Verhältnissen

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Anna Gayger

This dissertation is devoted to assessing price adjustment clauses in European competition law. In practice, such clauses often require the disclosure of sensitive market information by competitors to a common contractual partner. This disclosure of information can be a form of hub-and-spoke collusion. The extent to which a price adjustment clause falls under the prohibition of cartels in Art. 101 of the TFEU, and thus whether an agreement without any contact between competitors is possible, depends in particular on the definition of a concerted practice. Whether accidental and unintentional participation in the exchange of information should also fall within the scope of Art. 101 (1) of the TFEU is subject to discussion. The author argues for a nuanced assessment of conscious and unconscious indirect information exchange.

2016 ◽  
Vol 14 (4) ◽  
pp. 388-414
Author(s):  
Alexandra P. Mikroulea

AbstractOpt-in or opt-out? That is the basic question to be answered. The decision to promote actions of “opt-in” type as opposed to those of the “opt-out” type, for the sake of private autonomy, does not ensure the effective application of european competition law. On the contrary, it may decrease the application’s intensity and effectiveness. Recent reforms among European state members such as in the United Kingdom, Belgium, the Netherlands, Denmark and Norway are powerful indications that the opt-out principle may result in the effective implementation of competition law. There is no doubt that a mixed system (hybrid system), providing the court with the power to decide in favour of either the opt-in or the opt-out system, will result in better implementation of competition law. At the present time there are two pending cases in England (Dorothy Gibson and Mastercard) for which the decision on opt-out or opt-in are highly anticipated. Should the court decide, in one or both of the cases, on an opt-out approach, this will bring a momentous reevaluation of the entire collective redress concept.


2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sung Won Jung ◽  
Sungchul Bae ◽  
Donghyeong Seong ◽  
Byoung-Kee Yi

BACKGROUND Through several years of the healthcare information exchange based on the HIE project, some problems were found in the CDA documents generated. OBJECTIVE To fix some problems, we developed the K-CDA Implementation Guide (K means S. Korea) that conforms to the HL7 CDA, and suits the domestic conditions regarding the healthcare information. METHODS We achieved by analyzing HIE guideline and the U.S. C-CDA, and comparing each item. The items that required further discussion were reviewed by the expert committee. Based on the reviews, the previously developed templates were revised. RESULTS A total of 35 CDA templates were developed: five document-level templates, fourteen section-level templates, and sixteen entry-level templates. The 28 value sets used in the templates have been improved and the OIDs for HIE have been redefined CONCLUSIONS The K-CDA IG allows management in the form of a template library based on the definition of the General K-Header and the structured templates. This enables the K-CDA IG to respond to the expansion of national HIE templates with flexibility. For the K-CDA IG, the CDA template in current use was incorporated to the greatest extent possible, to minimize the scope of modifications. It enables the national HIE and the HIE with countries abroad.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document