scholarly journals Hall Thruster: An Electric Propulsion through Plasmas

Author(s):  
Sukhmander Singh

The chapter discussed the technological application of plasma physics in space science. The plasma technology is using laser-plasma fusion, inertial fusion, Terahertz wave generation and welding of metals. In this chapter, the application of plasma physics in the field of electric propulsion and types has been discussed. These devices have much higher exhaust velocities, longer life time, high thrust density than chemical propulsion devices and useful for space missions with regard to the spacecraft station keeping, rephrasing and orbit topping applications. The mathematical relation has been derived to obtain the performance parameters of the propulsion devices.


2021 ◽  
Vol 130 (5) ◽  
pp. 053306
Author(s):  
Francesco Marchioni ◽  
Mark A. Cappelli


2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Timothy S. Kokan ◽  
James F. Horton ◽  
Claude R. Joyner ◽  
Daniel J. Levack ◽  
Dennis E. Morris ◽  
...  


Author(s):  
Jason D. Frieman ◽  
Hani Kamhawi ◽  
Wensheng Huang ◽  
Jon Mackey ◽  
Drew M. Ahern ◽  
...  


2012 ◽  
Vol 2012 ◽  
pp. 1-16 ◽  
Author(s):  
Li Yan ◽  
Ping-Yang Wang ◽  
Yang-Hua Ou ◽  
Xiao-Lu Kang

Potential sputtering erosion caused by the interactions between spacecraft and plasma plume of Hall thrusters is a concern for electric propulsion. In this study, calculation model of Hall thruster’s plume and sputtering erosion is presented. The model is based on three dimensional hybrid particle-in-cell and direct simulation Monte Carlo method (PIC/DSMC method) which is integrated with plume-wall sputtering yield model. For low-energy heavy-ion sputtering in Hall thruster plume, the Matsunami formula for the normal incidence sputtering yield and the Yamamura angular dependence of sputtering yield are used. The validation of the simulation model is realized through comparing plume results with the measured data. Then, SPT-70’s sputtering erosion on satellite surfaces is assessed and effect of mass flow rate on sputtering erosion is analyzed.



2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ricardo Hueso ◽  
Imke de Pater ◽  
Erandi Chavez ◽  
Amy Simon ◽  
Larry Sromovsky ◽  
...  

<p>Neptune’s atmosphere is highly dynamic with atmospheric systems observable as bands and discrete cloud systems that evolve in time scales of days, weeks and years. Most of them are observed as tropospheric clouds and elevated hazes that appear highly contrasted in observations obtained in hydrogen and methane absorption bands in the red and near-infrared spectrum of the planet. Given the small size of Neptune as observed from Earth (2.3 arcsec), it is difficult to characterize most of these clouds. Basic questions such as if they are convective storms, vortices or clouds detached from atmospheric waves or bands can be difficult for an specific feature in a given observation [1]. Only Adaptive Optics or lucky-imaging instruments in 8-m telescopes or larger, and HST, can provide suitable data, but the difficulty to access enough observational time in these facilities suggests that a combination of data from several observing programs can help. Smaller telescopes can also play an important role since they can be used to follow the main cloud systems and cover the gaps between observations obtained by the larger telescopes. This can provide the life-time or drift rates of the largest meteorological systems allowing to compare observations of the same features observed months apart in the largest telescopes.</p> <p>During the last few years we have combined observations obtained from a variety of telescopes to study the major cloud systems and understand their life-time and evolution [2, 3], including those of “companion” clouds linked to rare dark vortices that are only observable in blue wavelengths from space [2, 4, 5]. In this work we present our data for 2019 which consists of the following observations:</p> <ul> <li>HST observations from the Outer Planets Atmospheres Legacy program (OPAL).</li> <li>Several sets from Keck and Lick telescopes from different programs including some relatively frequent observations from the TWILIGHT program.</li> <li>GTC observations with the HiperCam instrument doing lucky-imaging.</li> <li>Calar Alto 2.2m telescope with the PlanetCam lucky-imaging instrument.</li> <li>One single observation from Gemini while testing an AO system.</li> <li>Additional observations from the Pic du Midi 1.05 m telescope.</li> <li>Images provided by amateur astronomers and available through the PVOL [6] database.</li> </ul> <p>The combination of these data suggests more variability and less cloud activity in 2019 than in previous years with a lower number of features in the data sets obtained with smaller telescopes. We provide the identification of particular meteorological systems over late summer 2019 and present drift rates of different mid-latitude features in the south hemisphere that are close but separated enough to the Voyager zonal winds to deserve attention. Other cloud systems in the south polar region and north tropics seem to follow the Voyager wind profile.</p> <p>Future punctual observations achievable with new observational facilities such as the JWST will benefit from the evolutionary time-lines of the major cloud systems of Neptune and their drift rates in the atmosphere provided by similar future campaigns.</p> <p><strong>References</strong></p> <p>[1] Hueso and Sánchez-Lavega, Atmospheric Dynamics and Vertical Structure of Uranus and Neptune's weather layers. Space Science Reviews, 2019.</p> <p>[2] Hueso et al., Neptune long-lived atmospheric features in 2013-2015 from small (28-cm) to large (10-m) telescopes. Icarus, 2017.</p> <p>[3] Molter et al., Analysis of Neptune's 2017 Bright Equatorial Storm, Icarus, 2019.</p> <p>[4] Wong et al., A New Dark vortex on Neptune, The Astronomical Journal, 2018.</p> <p>[5] Hsu et al., Lifetimes and Occurrence Rates of Dark Vortices on Neptune from 25 Years of Hubble Space Telescope Images, The Astronomical Journal, 2018.</p> <p>[6] Hueso et al., The Planetary Virtual Observatory and Laboratory (PVOL) and its integration into the Virtual European Solar and Planetary Access (VESPA), Planetary Space Science, 2018.</p>





2022 ◽  
Vol 9 ◽  
Author(s):  
Lei Chang ◽  
Rod Boswell ◽  
Guangnan Luo

The First Helicon Plasma Physics and Applications Workshop was held on September 23−24, 2021, through Zoom Cloud Meeting, instead of in an on-site gathering, due to the COVID-19 pandemic. It was convened by Rod Boswell (IOC) and Guangnan Luo (LOC), and organised by Lei Chang’s group. The workshop attracted 110 registrations and ∼100 online audiences from ∼30 affiliations. There were 33 presentations covering the various fundamental physics of helicon plasma and its applications to space electric propulsion, material processing, and magnetic confinement fusion. This paper highlights the presentations, discussions, and perspectives given in the workshop, serving as reference for the helicon community.



2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sukhmander Singh ◽  
Bhavna Vidhani ◽  
Ashish Tyagi

The first part of the contributed chapter discuss the overview of electric propulsion technology and its requirement in different space missions. The technical terms specific impulse and thrust are explained with their relation to exhaust velocity. The shortcoming of the Hall thrusters and its erosion problems of the channel walls are also conveyed. The second part of the chapter discuss the various waves and electromagnetic instabilities propagating in a Hall thruster magnetized plasma. The dispersion relation for the azimuthal growing waves is derived analytically with the help of magnetohydrodynamics theory. It is depicted that the growth rate of the instability increases with magnetic field, electron drift velocity and collisional frequency, whereas it is decreases with the initial drift of the ions.



Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document