scholarly journals Blunt Abdominal Trauma Patients Are at Very Low Risk for Intra-Abdominal Injury after Emergency Department Observation

2011 ◽  
Vol 12 (4) ◽  
pp. 496-504 ◽  
Author(s):  
John Kendall ◽  
Andrew Kestler ◽  
Kurt Whitaker ◽  
Mette-Magarethe Adkisson ◽  
Jason Haukoos
Author(s):  
Laurie Malia ◽  
Joni E. Rabiner

Blunt abdominal trauma is common in pediatric trauma. This chapter discusses a child who presents to the emergency department with left upper quadrant pain after being struck by a motor vehicle. The point-of-care focused assessment with sonography for trauma (FAST) examination provides quick, reliable information on bleeding into the peritoneal, pericardial, and pleural spaces in the setting of trauma. The FAST exam is highly sensitive for identification of hemoperitoneum but is less accurate for ruling out hemoperitoneum and intra-abdominal injury. Discussion of the trauma evaluation and utility of the FAST examination in the context of pediatric blunt abdominal trauma is presented.


2020 ◽  
Vol 19 (2) ◽  
pp. 140-146
Author(s):  
Amir Hinbis Masawod ◽  
◽  
Hazim Jabbar Kashtal ◽  
Ahmed Modher Khalaf

Background: Blunt abdominal trauma is a common problem in our country.Some of the cases had been explored on no bases which were negative by FAST(focused assessment with sonography of trauma)FAST is a tool to detect intra-abdominal collection. Objective: To appreciate the value of (FAST) in blunt abdominal trauma. Patients and Methods: This study performed by a collection of 100 cases of blunt abdominal trauma admitted to the emergency department at Baquba Teaching Hospital from the period 1st January, 2013 to 31st December 2013 fast performed on all cases to detect any intra-abdominal collection, then correlation with this result and laparotomy or conservative results. Results: Out of 100 patients, Twenty seven cases had intra-abdominal collection and seventy three cases had no intra-abdominal collection by fast, 27 cases were positive and one case false positive and 73 cases were negative and 2 false-negative results and 71 true negative. The sensitivity was 92.8 % and specificity 98.6%. The positive predictive value was 96.2 % and negative predictive value 97.2 % and the accuracy 97 %. Conclusion: Focused assessment sonography of trauma can detect intra-abdominal fluid accurately and rapidly, FAST potentially valuable tool for better assessment of trauma in the emergency department. Keywords: Focus assessment with sonography of trauma (FAST), blunt abdominal trauma, abdominal emergency


2019 ◽  
Vol 54 (9) ◽  
pp. 1854-1860 ◽  
Author(s):  
Benjamin K. Nti ◽  
Megan Laniewicz ◽  
Tracy Skaggs ◽  
Keith Cross ◽  
Mary E. Fallat ◽  
...  

2011 ◽  
Vol 57 (4) ◽  
pp. 387-404 ◽  
Author(s):  
Deborah B. Diercks ◽  
Abhishek Mehrotra ◽  
Devorah J. Nazarian ◽  
Susan B. Promes ◽  
Wyatt W. Decker ◽  
...  

2007 ◽  
Vol 188 (2) ◽  
pp. 415-421 ◽  
Author(s):  
Brett C. Lee ◽  
Eleanor L. Ormsby ◽  
John P. McGahan ◽  
Giselle M. Melendres ◽  
John R. Richards

2019 ◽  
Vol 109 (2) ◽  
pp. 89-95 ◽  
Author(s):  
J. Kosola ◽  
T. Brinck ◽  
A. Leppäniemi ◽  
L. Handolin

Background and Aims: Blunt abdominal trauma can lead to substantial organ injury and hemorrhage necessitating open abdominal surgery. Currently, the trend in surgeon training is shifting away from general surgery and the surgical treatment of blunt abdominal trauma patients is often done by sub-specialized surgeons. The aim of this study was to identify what emergency procedures are needed after blunt abdominal trauma and whether they can be performed with the skill set of a general surgeon. Materials and Methods: The records of blunt abdominal trauma patients requiring emergency laparotomy (n = 100) over the period 2006–2016 (Helsinki University Hospital Trauma Registry) were reviewed. The organ injuries and the complexity of the procedures were evaluated. Results: A total of 89 patients (no need for complex skills, NCS) were treated with the skill set of general surgeons while 11 patients required complex skills. Complex skills patients were more severely injured (New Injury Severity Score 56.4 vs 35.9, p < 0.001) and had a lower systolic blood pressure (mean: 89 vs 112, p = 0.044) and higher mean shock index (heart rate/systolic blood pressure: 1.43 vs 0.95, p = 0.012) on admission compared with NCS patients. The top three NCS procedures were splenectomy (n = 33), bowel repair (n = 31), and urinary bladder repair (n = 16). In patients requiring a complex procedure (CS), the bleeding site was the liver (n = 7) or a major blood vessel (n = 4). Conclusion: The majority of patients requiring emergency laparotomy can be managed with the skills of a general surgeon. Non-responder blunt abdominal trauma patients with positive ultrasound are highly likely to require complex skills. The future training of surgeons should concentrate on NCS procedures while at the same time recognizing those injuries requiring complex skills.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document