Cytologic Features of High-Grade Squamous Intraepithelial Lesion in ThinPrep Papanicolaou Test Slides: Comparison of Cases That Performed Poorly With Those That Performed Well in the College of American Pathologists Interlaboratory Comparison Program in Cervicovaginal Cytology

2004 ◽  
Vol 128 (7) ◽  
pp. 746-748 ◽  
Author(s):  
Andrew A. Renshaw ◽  
Michael A. Schulte ◽  
Elizabeth Plott ◽  
Barbara Dubray-Benstein ◽  
Camilla J. Cobb ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Interlaboratory Comparison ◽  
Pap Test ◽  
Test Cases ◽  
High Grade ◽  
Squamous Intraepithelial Lesion ◽  
Squamous Intraepithelial Lesions ◽  
Papanicolaou Test ◽  
Intraepithelial Lesion ◽  
Intraepithelial Lesions

Abstract Context.—Conventional Papanicolaou (Pap) test slides of high-grade squamous intraepithelial lesions (HSILs) that are frequently misdiagnosed are known to have relatively few dysplastic cells. Whether this is true of cases of HSIL in ThinPrep Pap Test specimens is not known. Objective.—To determine if cases of HSIL in ThinPrep specimens that are frequently missed have relatively few dysplastic cells. Design.—The cytologic features of 16 ThinPrep cases of HSIL that performed poorly in the College of American Pathologists Interlaboratory Comparison Program were compared with 22 ThinPrep Pap Test cases that performed extremely well. Results.—Significantly more cases that performed poorly had fewer than 250 dysplastic cells (13/16) than cases that performed well (3/22) (P < .001). Conclusion.—ThinPrep Pap Test cases with a diagnosis of HSIL that performed poorly in this program had significantly fewer dysplastic cells than those that performed well.

Cytologic Features of Low-Grade Squamous Intraepithelial Lesion in ThinPrep Papanicolaou Test Slides and Conventional Smears: Comparison of Cases That Performed Poorly With Those That Performed Well in the College of American Pathologists Interlaboratory Comparison Program in Cervicovaginal Cytology

2005 ◽  
Vol 129 (1) ◽  
pp. 23-25 ◽  
Author(s):  
Andrew A. Renshaw ◽  
Barbara Dubray-Benstein ◽  
Jennifer Haja ◽  
Jonathan H. Hughes
Keyword(s):  
Interlaboratory Comparison ◽  
Pap Test ◽  
Median Number ◽  
Low Grade ◽  
High Grade ◽  
Squamous Intraepithelial Lesion ◽  
Papanicolaou Test ◽  
Abnormal Cells ◽  
Intraepithelial Lesion ◽  
Intraepithelial Lesions

Abstract Context.—Both conventional and ThinPrep Papanicolaou smears with high-grade squamous intraepithelial lesions that are frequently missed are known to have relatively few abnormal cells. Whether this is also true of cases of low-grade squamous intraepithelial lesion is not known. Objective.—To compare the cytologic features of cases of low-grade squamous intraepithelial lesion that perform poorly with the features of cases that perform well. Design.—The cytologic features of 10 ThinPrep Pap Test and conventional smear cases of low-grade squamous intraepithelial lesion that performed poorly in the College of American Pathologists Interlaboratory Comparison Program were compared with 46 ThinPrep Pap Test and conventional smear cases that performed extremely well. The numbers of abnormal cells were categorized into less than 50, 51 to 100, 101 to 250, 251 to 500, and more than 500. Results.—The median number of abnormal cells for cases that performed poorly was less than 50, whereas the median number of abnormal cells for cases that performed well was between 101 and 250. Overall, cases that performed poorly were significantly more likely to have less than 50, less than 100, and less than 250 abnormal cells than cases that performed well (P < .001, P < .001, and P = .009, respectively). A minority of cases performed well even with very few abnormal cells and groups. The same findings were present when conventional smears and ThinPrep specimens were analyzed separately. Conclusions.—ThinPrep Pap Test cases and conventional smears with a diagnosis of low-grade squamous intraepithelial lesion that perform poorly in this program have significantly fewer abnormal cells than those that perform well. The median number of abnormal cells in cases that performed well is lower than that of comparable high-grade cases in the program.

Interobserver Variability in Subclassification of Squamous Intraepithelial Lesions

1999 ◽  
Vol 123 (11) ◽  
pp. 1079-1084 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sherry L. Woodhouse ◽  
Janet F. Stastny ◽  
Patricia E. Styer ◽  
Mary Kennedy ◽  
Amy H. Praestgaard ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Interlaboratory Comparison ◽  
Interobserver Variability ◽  
High Grade ◽  
Test Results ◽  
Squamous Intraepithelial Lesions ◽  
Papanicolaou Test ◽  
Management Guidelines ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Intraepithelial Lesion ◽  
Intraepithelial Lesions

Abstract Objective.—To determine whether, on a national cytology proficiency test, a competent cytologist can consistently distinguish grades of squamous intraepithelial lesions. Design.—Results for low- and high-grade squamous intraepithelial lesion referenced slides from the College of American Pathologists Interlaboratory Comparison Program in Cervicovaginal Cytology for 1996 and 1997 were analyzed including educational, nongraded vs graded validated slides. Results.—The discrepant rate between low- and high- grade lesions ranged from 9.8% to 15% for cytotechnologist, pathologist, laboratory, and all responses. There was a statistically significant difference in performance on graded, validated slides vs educational slides with better performance on validated slides. Conclusion.—This significant interobserver variability in subclassification of squamous lesions should be considered in management guidelines for abnormal Papanicolaou test results and implementation of national cytology proficiency testing.

Only a Small Fraction of High-Grade Cervical Lesions Are Discovered After an Interpretation of Atypical Squamous Cells of Undetermined Significance When Using Imager-Assisted, Liquid-Based Papanicolaou Tests and the Bethesda 2001 System

2012 ◽  
Vol 137 (7) ◽  
pp. 936-941 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kelly A. Khan ◽  
Debora A. Smith ◽  
Michael J. Thrall
Keyword(s):  
Low Grade ◽  
High Grade ◽  
Test Results ◽  
Squamous Intraepithelial Lesion ◽  
Squamous Intraepithelial Lesions ◽  
Papanicolaou Test ◽  
Squamous Cells ◽  
Intraepithelial Lesion ◽  
Intraepithelial Lesions ◽  
Undetermined Significance

Context.—Previous work has reported that most high-grade cervical neoplasia is seen in patients with preceding Papanicolaou test results of atypical squamous cells of undetermined significance. This information was based on conventional test results and the Bethesda 1991 reporting system and was determined before the current treatment guidelines. Objective.—Our objective was to perform a retrospective review of all histologically confirmed, high-grade cervical neoplasia to determine the diagnosis of the preceding liquid-based Papanicolaou test. Design.—A total of 189 histologically confirmed, high-grade cervical intraepithelial neoplasia (CIN) cases grade 2 and greater were identified for a 1-year period. Results.—Of the 189 cases, 10 (5.3%) had a previous diagnosis of atypical squamous cells of undetermined significance; 55 (29.1%) had low-grade squamous intraepithelial lesions; 31 (16.4%) had low-grade squamous intraepithelial lesions, unable to rule out a high-grade squamous intraepithelial lesion; 21 (11.1%) had atypical squamous cells, unable to rule out a high-grade squamous intraepithelial lesion; 68 (36%) had high-grade squamous intraepithelial lesions; 1 (0.5%) had atypical glandular cells; 1 (0.5%) had adenocarcinoma in situ; and 2 (1%) had invasive carcinoma. Combined “low grade” Papanicolaou test results (atypical squamous cells of undetermined significance and low-grade squamous intraepithelial lesion) preceded 51 of 103 cases of CIN 2 (49.5%) and 14 of 103 cases (13.6%) of CIN 3/cancer, whereas “high grade” Papanicolaou test results (atypical squamous cells, unable to rule out a high-grade squamous intraepithelial lesion; low-grade squamous intraepithelial lesions, unable to rule out a high-grade squamous intraepithelial lesion; high-grade squamous intraepithelial lesions; atypical glandular cells; adenocarcinoma in situ; and invasive carcinoma) preceded 52 of 103 CIN 2 cases (50.5%) and 72 of 103 CIN 3/cancer cases (69.9%). Conclusions.—Our data show that we can now more-reliably predict high-grade dysplasia on routine Papanicolaou tests. Only a small fraction of histologically confirmed CIN 2/3 cases are found following a Papanicolaou test diagnosis of atypical squamous cells of undetermined significance.

scholarly journals The effectiveness of cold-knife conization (CKC) for post-menopausal women with cervical high-grade squamous intraepithelial lesion: a retrospective study

BMC Surgery ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 21 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Xiao Li ◽  
Meihua Liu ◽  
Yurou Ji ◽  
Pengpeng Qu
Keyword(s):  
Primary Therapy ◽  
High Grade ◽  
Squamous Intraepithelial Lesion ◽  
Squamous Intraepithelial Lesions ◽  
Menopausal Women ◽  
Intraepithelial Lesion ◽  
Cold Knife ◽  
Cold Knife Conization ◽  
Post Menopausal ◽  
Intraepithelial Lesions

Abstract Background The effectiveness of surgery of high-grade squamous intraepithelial lesion in post-menopausal women needs to be investigated. This study evaluated the clinical significance of cold-knife conization in the diagnosis and surgery of cervical high-grade squamous intraepithelial lesions in post-menopausal women. Methods We conducted a retrospective analysis of post- and pre-menopausal patients with high-grade squamous intraepithelial lesion. All patients received cold-knife conization as the primary therapy. Results The satisfactory rate of colposcopy was significantly lower in the post-menopausal group than in the pre-menopausal group (38.33 vs. 71.25%; χ2 = 36.202, P < 0.001). The overall positive margin rate of cold-knife conization (25.83 vs 12.50%; χ2 = 10.106, P = 0.001) and rate of positive endocervical cone margins (16.67 vs. 4.58%; χ2 = 14.843, P < 0.001) were significantly higher in the post-menopausal group. Moreover, 49 post- and 60 pre-menopausal women underwent subsequent surgical treatment (40.83 vs. 25.00%). Residual rate of positive and negative margins in patients before and after menopause was significantly different (χ2 = 5.711, P = 0.017; χ2 = 12.726, P < 0.001, respectively). The recurrence rate in post-menopausal women remained 3.85%. Conclusions Cold-knife conization can be performed as a primary procedure for diagnosis and surgery of post-menopausal patients with high-grade squamous intraepithelial lesions. Sufficient deep excisions are necessary to avoid positive endocervical margins, which can reduce the residual and recurrence of postoperative lesions.

Role of Ancillary Techniques in Cervical Biopsy and Endocervical Curettage Specimens as Follow-Up to Papanicolaou Test Results Indicating a Diagnosis of Atypical Squamous Cells, Cannot Exclude High-Grade Squamous Intraepithelial Lesion, or High-Grade Squamous Intraepithelial Lesion

2019 ◽  
Vol 64 (1-2) ◽  
pp. 155-165 ◽  
Author(s):  
Taylor M. Jenkins ◽  
Hadi Shojaei ◽  
Sharon J. Song ◽  
Lauren E. Schwartz
Keyword(s):  
Cervical Dysplasia ◽  
Pap Test ◽  
High Grade ◽  
Squamous Intraepithelial Lesion ◽  
Papanicolaou Test ◽  
Squamous Cells ◽  
Cervical Biopsy ◽  
Intraepithelial Lesion ◽  
Infected Cells ◽  
Tissue Specimens

The Papanicolaou (PAP) test is widely used to screen for cervical cancer. All high-grade lesions such as atypical squamous cells, cannot exclude high-grade squamous intraepithelial lesion (ASC-H), and high-grade squamous intraepithelial lesion, identified on a PAP test should be followed-up by a confirmatory cervical biopsy. In this review, we discuss the challenges in interpreting cervical tissue specimens and the various ancillary techniques used in the evaluation of cervical dysplasia. Ancillary studies include deeper levels, p16 immunohistochemistry (IHC), human papillomavirus (HPV) testing, and, importantly, cyto-histologic correlation. Of these, p16 IHC is consistently sensitive and specific for detecting HSIL. HPV RNA in situ hybridization (ISH) is a newer technique with excellent sensitivity and specificity for detecting virally infected cells and it may be more broadly applicable to both low- and high-grade squamous intraepithelial lesions.

Practices of Participants in the College of American Pathologists Interlaboratory Comparison Program in Cervicovaginal Cytology, 2006

2010 ◽  
Vol 134 (3) ◽  
pp. 331-335 ◽  
Author(s):  
Galen M. Eversole ◽  
Ann T. Moriarty ◽  
Mary R. Schwartz ◽  
Amy C. Clayton ◽  
Rhona Souers ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Squamous Cell ◽  
Interlaboratory Comparison ◽  
Low Grade ◽  
Squamous Intraepithelial Lesion ◽  
Squamous Intraepithelial Lesions ◽  
Atypical Squamous Cell ◽  
Squamous Cells ◽  
Intraepithelial Lesion ◽  
Intraepithelial Lesions ◽  
Median Rate

Abstract Context.—Liquid-based preparations (LBPs) and human papillomavirus testing have led to changes in cervical cytology practices. The College of American Pathologists attempts to track practice patterns using a supplemental questionnaire, which allows laboratories to report diagnostic practices. Objective.—To analyze the 2006 reporting practices and to compare the results with the 2003 survey data. Design.—Questionnaire was mailed to 1621 laboratories. Participants included laboratories enrolled in the 2006 College of American Pathologists Gynecologic Proficiency Testing Program or the educational Interlaboratory Comparison Program in Gynecologic Cytology. Results.—Of the 679 responding laboratories (response rate, 42%), most (97.8%; n  =  664) had implemented the Bethesda 2001 terminology. The median rate for all preparations with low-grade squamous intraepithelial lesions was 2.5% (2.9% for LBPs) compared with a 2003 median rate of 2.1%; the increase was confined to LBPs. Rates for high-grade squamous intraepithelial lesions (median, 0.5%) and atypical squamous cells have changed little. High-grade squamous intraepithelial lesions and unsatisfactory rates varied at statistically significant levels between types of LBPs. Most atypical squamous cell cases were subclassified as undetermined significance (median, 4.3%). The median ratio of atypical squamous cells to squamous intraepithelial lesions and carcinomas for all specimen types combined was 1.5, similar to the 2003 median ratio of 1.4. The median rates for findings of squamous cell abnormalities for 2006 were significantly higher for LBPs than for conventional smears. Conclusions.—Most responding laboratories have implemented the Bethesda 2001 terminology. There is an increase in LBP low-grade squamous intraepithelial lesion rates when compared with 2003 data. Liquid-based preparations have higher median squamous intraepithelial lesion and atypical squamous cell rates.

Relevance of the Pap Test: A Report of HPV-DNA Test-Negative High-Grade Squamous Intraepithelial Lesions of the Female Lower Genital Tract

2016 ◽  
Vol 60 (5) ◽  
pp. 445-450 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yiang Hui ◽  
Katrine Hansen ◽  
Jayasimha Murthy ◽  
Danielle Chau ◽  
C. James Sung ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
High Risk ◽  
Pap Test ◽  
Human Papillomaviruses ◽  
High Grade ◽  
Squamous Intraepithelial Lesions ◽  
Cytologic Examination ◽  
Dna Test ◽  
Hpv Dna ◽  
Intraepithelial Lesions ◽  
Hpv Dna Test

Objective: A vast majority of cervicovaginal intraepithelial lesions are caused by high-risk human papillomaviruses (HPVs). The Pap test has been the sole method used for the screening of cervicovaginal squamous intraepithelial lesions (SIL). Recently, the FDA approved an HPV-DNA assay as a method of primary screening. We report on a series of FDA-approved HPV-DNA test-negative SIL with HPV genotyping, using an alternative method on the corresponding surgical biopsy specimens. Study Design: A retrospective review identified cytology-positive HPV-negative cases over a 15-month period at a tertiary care gynecologic oncology institution. Corresponding biopsies were reviewed and genotyped for high-risk HPVs. Results: Of the 18,200 total cases, 17 patients meeting the study criteria were selected with 27 surgical specimens corresponding to their cytologic diagnoses. Four patients with high-grade lesions were identified, 3 of whom (75%) were positive for HPV. One of these 4 patients (25%) showed high-grade SIL on biopsies from 4 separate sites in the cervix and vagina. Multiviral HPV infections were frequent. Conclusions: We discuss the relevance of cotesting for screening cervical SILs and emphasize that false-negative results are possible with the FDA-approved HPV screening assay, also in patients with high-grade SIL. These cases may be detectable by cytologic examination and this suggests that the Pap test remains an important diagnostic tool.

Human Papillomavirus Testing and Reporting Rates: Practices of Participants in the College of American Pathologists Interlaboratory Comparison Program in Gynecologic Cytology in 2006

2008 ◽  
Vol 132 (8) ◽  
pp. 1290-1294 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ann T. Moriarty ◽  
Mary R. Schwartz ◽  
Galen Eversole ◽  
Marilee Means ◽  
Amy Clayton ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Human Papillomavirus ◽  
Interlaboratory Comparison ◽  
Low Grade ◽  
Hpv Testing ◽  
Squamous Intraepithelial Lesion ◽  
Papanicolaou Test ◽  
Frequency Distributions ◽  
Squamous Cells ◽  
Hpv Test ◽  
Intraepithelial Lesion

Abstract Context.—Oncogenic, high-risk human papillomavirus (HR-HPV) testing is used to evaluate women who are older than 20 years with atypical squamous cells of undetermined significance (ASC-US) and in conjunction with a screening Papanicolaou test in women older than 30 years. Objectives.—To evaluate the 2006 laboratory practice data from laboratories incorporating human papillomavirus (HPV) testing with the Papanicolaou test. Design.—To use the College of American Pathologists (CAP) Supplemental Questionnaire Survey for 2006 to determine laboratory practices of participants in the CAP Interlaboratory Comparison Program in Cervicovaginal Cytology. Results.—A total of 679 laboratories responded to the questionnaire. Most (73%) refer HPV testing to reference laboratories. Nine percent perform HPV testing in cytology. Forty-five percent offer low-risk HPV (LR-HPV) testing. The most common reflex is ASC-US, although HR-HPV is also offered with low-grade squamous intraepithelial lesion (LSIL), high-grade squamous intraepithelial lesion (HSIL), or any other Papanicolaou test result. Digene Hybrid Capture II is the most common method. Human papilloma virus median test volumes are 55 monthly. Frequency distributions of HPV test volumes are significantly different from those found in 2003. Laboratories performing in-house testing reported significantly higher monthly HPV volumes (P &lt; .001). Median rates for HR-HPV positivity are 36.6% for ASC-US, 50.0% for atypical squamous cells, cannot exclude HSIL (ASC-H), and 4% for women 30 years of age and older in conjunction with a screening Papanicolaou test. Conclusions.—Reference HPV testing remains the most common pattern. The most common reflex indication is for ASC-US, but HPV testing is modified locally to include a variety of scenarios. LR-HPV testing is commonly offered despite its lack of clinical significance. These data form a baseline for ongoing monitoring of HPV testing practice trends.

Papanicolaou Tests With Mixed High-Grade and Low-Grade Squamous Intraepithelial Lesion Features: Distinct Performance in the College of American Pathologists Interlaboratory Comparison Program in Cervicovaginal Cytopathology

2006 ◽  
Vol 130 (4) ◽  
pp. 456-459
Author(s):  
Andrew A. Renshaw ◽  
Dina R. Mody ◽  
Patricia Styer ◽  
Mary Schwartz ◽  
Barbara Ducatman ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Interlaboratory Comparison ◽  
Low Grade ◽  
High Grade ◽  
Squamous Intraepithelial Lesion ◽  
Performance Trends ◽  
Mixed Features ◽  
Intraepithelial Lesion ◽  
Slide Type ◽  
Pure Versus ◽  
Better Than

Abstract Context.—Previous studies have shown that in gynecologic cytology, cases of low-grade squamous intraepithelial lesion (LSIL) and high-grade squamous intraepithelial lesion (HSIL) perform differently on interpretive review. The performance of cases with mixed LSIL and HSIL features is unknown. Objective.—To compare the performance of gynecologic cytology cases of “pure” LSIL and HSIL with cases showing mixed LSIL and HSIL features. Design.—We compiled performance data from the College of American Pathologists Interlaboratory Comparison Program in Cervicovaginal Cytopathology from the years 2003 and 2004, and compared the performance of slides showing relatively pure LSIL and HSIL (≤10% misclassification as HSIL and LSIL, respectively) with slides showing mixed LSIL or HSIL features (cases misclassified as LSIL or HSIL &gt;10% of the time). Results.—Interpretations from a total of 4508 cases (2452 HSIL and 2056 LSIL) were analyzed. Overall, the sensitivity of participants on slides with a reference diagnosis of HSIL was 97.3%, and of LSIL was 95.9%. Performance trends for pure versus mixed cases varied by slide type and reference diagnosis. For conventional slides, participant sensitivity on pure HSIL cases was greatest (98.0%) and on pure LSIL cases was least (95.2%), while participant performance on cases with mixed features was intermediate (97.0% for mixed HSIL and 96.7% for mixed LSIL). In contrast, participant performance on ThinPrep slides showed the greatest sensitivity for mixed LSIL slides (97.9%), while performance on mixed HSIL slides showed the lowest sensitivity (95.7%); slides with pure features had intermediate sensitivity levels (96.3% for both HSIL and LSIL). Further evaluation demonstrated that conventional pure HSIL slides performed significantly better than mixed HSIL slides (P = .006), whereas mixed LSIL slides performed better than pure LSIL slides (P = .01). For ThinPrep slides, pure HSIL cases performed similarly to mixed HSIL cases (P = .43), while mixed LSIL cases performed better than pure LSIL cases (P = .04). Conclusion.—Slides with mixed LSIL and HSIL features have measurably distinct performance characteristics in comparison to slides with pure LSIL or HSIL features. Participant performance on conventional mixed cases is distinctly different from performance on ThinPrep mixed cases.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document