Epic revisionism: Russian history and literature as Stalinist propaganda

2006 ◽  
Vol 44 (03) ◽  
pp. 44-1417-44-1417
Slavic Review ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 80 (2) ◽  
pp. 327-333
Author(s):  
Erin Katherine Krafft

Folding together elements of anti-oppressive pedagogies and collaborative curriculum design, this contribution illuminates several possibilities for practicing anti-racism in the classroom while working with texts from Russian literature and history that do not necessarily center race. The identities and experiences of our students and ourselves, as well as the diverse forces that act upon us, are as important in the classroom as the texts in front of us, because our identities and experiences form the lens through which we interpret and interrogate. By framing this dynamic as a pedagogical tool, this contribution demonstrates that by engaging with Russian history and literature, students may gain critical perspectives on hierarchies of race, class, gender, and nation in their own lives and contexts while simultaneously discovering histories that they would not otherwise encounter, thereby broadening and deepening their sense of both global and national landscapes and their own positions and movements within them.


Author(s):  
Margarita V. Cherkashina ◽  

The article is devoted to Petrovsko-Razumovskoye estate history: after had belonged to the most noble and wealthy Russian families: Shuysky, Naryshkin, Razumovsky it was finally sold for arranging Agricultural academy named after Peter the Great (now Timiryazev) in 1860. In 1869 the place became infamous because of a murder, which then turned the subject of F.M. Dostoyevsky novel “The Deamons”. But this case does not exhaust the richness of Petrovsko-Razumovskoye literature life.


2020 ◽  
Vol 8 (5) ◽  
Author(s):  
Andrei Usachev

This review examines Prince Fyodor the Black in Russian History and Culture. Research and Texts (2019) by G. Lenhoff, an American Slavonic scholar, written with the participation of Russian scholars V. P. Efimenko and B. M. Kloss. Regarding the monograph as a very useful work on the history and literature of the Russian Middle Ages, the reviewer makes some remarks. First, it is necessary to clarify the spread of hagiographical texts in mediaeval Russia; second, it is important to consider the history of the veneration of Fyodor the Black in the context of ideological campaigns of the Russian Church and the secular authorities in the mid-sixteenth century; third, a more thorough examination of the account of Fyodor’s life written by Andrei Yuryev is required; and, finally, it is necessary to refer to some works on the hagiography of Tver and Suzdal and on manuscripts.


2007 ◽  
Vol 51 (3) ◽  
pp. 609
Author(s):  
Andrew M. Drozd ◽  
Kevin M. F. Platt ◽  
David Brandenberger

2021 ◽  
pp. 278-283
Author(s):  
V. K. Zubareva

V. Essipov’s monograph is alandmark product of Pushkin studies. It follows the relationship between Pushkin and Benckendorff over a ten-year period (1826– 1836). Benckendorff’s character is shown in an entirely new light. Unlike the one-sided depiction promoted by Soviet literary criticism, the author creates a controversial portrait, greatly aided by substantial details found in documents. Essipov treats this historical figure not only as a functionary, but also a human being. He demonstrates that Benckendorff was not nearly as narrow-minded and primitive as his traditional image in literature. The reviewer finds that the book will be of interest not only to Pushkin scholars, but also historians and anyone who would like to learn about the unconventional approach to Pushkin’s relationship with Benckendorff. The monograph can also be useful for playwrights and directors who are fascinated with that particular period in Russian history and literature.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document