scholarly journals Therapeutic Drug Monitoring of Moxifloxacin to Guide Treatment of Mycoplasma hominis Meningitis in an Extremely Preterm Infant

2021 ◽  
Vol 26 (8) ◽  
pp. 857-862
Author(s):  
Telford Yeung ◽  
Erin Chung ◽  
Jennifer Chen ◽  
Laura K. Erdman ◽  
Mina Smiljkovic ◽  
...  

Mycoplasma hominis (M hominis) is a rare cause of neonatal bacterial meningitis. Treatment can be challenging because of M hominis' intrinsic antibiotic resistance and the difficulty in accessing antimicrobial susceptibility testing. In this report, we describe an extremely preterm male infant with seizures who had a subsequent diagnosis of M hominis meningitis. Because of severity of illness, doxycycline (4 mg/kg IV every 24 hours) and moxifloxacin (5 mg/kg IV every 24 hours) were started empirically. Repeat cerebrospinal fluid cultures were negative and showed decreasing pleiocytosis. Given the concentration-dependent killing of moxifloxacin and concern for endovascular infection from a concomitant cerebral venous sinus thrombosis, serum concentrations of moxifloxacin were obtained to estimate pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic parameters. These were compared to the targets described in other case reports of M hominis meningitis. The maximum serum concentration (Cmax) was 2.5 mg/L, volume of distribution was 2.2 L/kg, clearance was 0.18 L/kg/hr, terminal half-life was 8.6 hours, and area-under-the-concentration-time curve (AUC) was 28.1 mg•hr/L. Using the range of minimum inhibitory concentrations (MICs) reported in the literature, the estimated Cmax/MIC for this patient was 21 to 158 (target Cmax/MIC: >10) and AUC/MIC was 234 to 1757 (target AUC/MIC: ≥100). Doxycycline and moxifloxacin were continued for 6 weeks. No adverse events to moxifloxacin or doxycycline were observed in the NICU. This report describes the successful treatment of M hominis neonatal meningitis and adds to the knowledge of pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic parameters of moxifloxacin in neonates. Additional data will help to confirm the role for routine therapeutic drug monitoring of moxifloxacin in neonates.

2020 ◽  
Vol 10 (4) ◽  
pp. 254-258 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jacob T. Brown ◽  
Jeffrey R. Bishop ◽  
Mark E. Schneiderhan

Abstract Pharmacogenomic (PGx) testing aided by therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM) has the potential to improve medication-related outcomes in some individuals prescribed psychiatric medications. Many commonly prescribed psychiatric medications are metabolized through polymorphic drug metabolizing enzymes such as cytochrome p450 (CYP) 2D6 (CYP2D6) and CYP2C19. Through PGx testing, clinicians can make biologically informed choices when selecting a new medication, and TDM may help inform dose adjustments or assess exposures to current treatments. Herein, we describe 2 complex case reports of individuals with multiple psychiatric diagnoses and extensive histories of medication failures who underwent PGx testing in addition to TDM as part of a pharmacist-led comprehensive medication therapy management evaluation in a community mental health clinic setting.


2016 ◽  
Vol 26 ◽  
pp. S585-S586
Author(s):  
V. Poinsignon ◽  
T. Poinsat ◽  
S. Raymond ◽  
M. Astier ◽  
C. Verstuyft ◽  
...  

2015 ◽  
Vol 59 (11) ◽  
pp. 7094-7096 ◽  
Author(s):  
Bryan P. White ◽  
Ben Lomaestro ◽  
Manjunath P. Pai

ABSTRACTWe report on the pharmacokinetics (PK) and pharmacodynamics (PD) of high-dose (>15 mg/kg of body weight per day) amikacin. A mean (standard deviation [SD]) maximum drug concentration in the serum (Cmax) and 24-h area under the concentration-time curve (AUC24) of 101 (49.4) mg/liter and 600 (387) mg · h/liter, respectively, were observed (n= 73) with 28.0 (8.47) mg/kg/day doses. An initial amikacin dose of 2,500 mg in adults weighing 40 kg to 200 kg with therapeutic drug monitoring to adjust the maintenance dose will optimize its PK and PD.


2019 ◽  
Vol 63 (5) ◽  
Author(s):  
Samiksha Ghimire ◽  
Bhagwan Maharjan ◽  
Erwin M. Jongedijk ◽  
Jos G. W. Kosterink ◽  
Gokarna R. Ghimire ◽  
...  

ABSTRACT Saliva may be a useful alternative matrix for monitoring levofloxacin concentrations in multidrug-resistant tuberculosis (MDR-TB) patients. The objectives of this study were (i) to evaluate the correlation between plasma and salivary levofloxacin (Lfx) concentrations in MDR-TB patients and (ii) to gauge the possibility of using saliva as an alternative sampling matrix for therapeutic drug monitoring of Lfx in areas where TB is endemic. This was a prospective pharmacokinetic study that enrolled MDR-TB patients receiving levofloxacin (750- to 1,000-mg once-daily dosing) under standardized treatment regimen in Nepal. Paired blood and saliva samples were collected at steady state. Lfx concentrations were quantified using liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry. Pharmacokinetic parameters were calculated using noncompartmental kinetics. Lfx drug exposures were evaluated in 23 MDR-TB patients. During the first month, the median (interquartile range [IQR]) areas under the concentration-time curve from 0 to 24 h (AUC0–24) were 67.09 (53.93 to 98.37) mg ⋅ h/liter in saliva and 99.91 (76.80 to 129.70) mg ⋅ h/liter in plasma, and the saliva plasma (S/P) ratio was 0.69 (0.53 to 0.99). Similarly, during the second month, the median (IQR) AUC0–24 were 75.63 (61.45 to 125.5) mg ⋅ h/liter in saliva and 102.7 (84.46 to 131.9) mg ⋅ h/liter in plasma, with an S/P ratio of 0.73 (0.66 to 1.18). Furthermore, large inter- and intraindividual variabilities in Lfx concentrations were observed. This study could not demonstrate a strong correlation between plasma and saliva Lfx levels. Despite a good Lfx penetration in saliva, the variability in individual saliva-to-plasma ratios limits the use of saliva as a valid substitute for plasma. Nevertheless, saliva could be useful in semiquantitatively predicting Lfx plasma levels. (This study has been registered at ClinicalTrials.gov under identifier NCT03000517.)


2010 ◽  
Vol 54 (11) ◽  
pp. 4605-4610 ◽  
Author(s):  
Federico Pea ◽  
Mario Furlanut ◽  
Piergiorgio Cojutti ◽  
Francesco Cristini ◽  
Eleonora Zamparini ◽  
...  

ABSTRACT The objective of the present retrospective observational study carried out in patients receiving a standard dosage of linezolid and undergoing routine therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM) was to assess the interindividual variability in plasma exposure, to identify the prevalence of attainment of optimal pharmacodynamics, and to define if an intensive program of TDM may be warranted in some categories of patients. Linezolid plasma concentrations (trough [C min] and peak [C max] levels) were analyzed by means of a high-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) method, and daily drug exposure was estimated (daily area under the plasma concentration-time curve [AUC24]). The final database included 280 C min and 223 C max measurements performed in 92 patients who were treated with the fixed 600-mg dose every 12 h (q12h) intravenously (n = 58) or orally (n = 34). A wide variability was observed (median values [interquartile range]: 3.80 mg/liter [1.75 to 7.53 mg/liter] for C min, 14.70 mg/liter [10.57 to 19.64] for C max, and 196.08 mg·h/liter [144.02 to 312.10 mg·h/liter] for estimated AUC24). Linezolid C min was linearly correlated with estimated AUC24 (r 2 = 0.85). Optimal pharmacodynamic target attainment (defined as C min of ≥2 mg/liter and/or AUC24/MIC90 ratio of >80) was obtained in about 60 to 70% of cases, but potential overexposure (defined as C min of ≥10 mg/liter and/or AUC24 of ≥400 mg·h/liter) was documented in about 12% of cases. A significantly higher proportion of cases with potential overexposure received cotreatment with omeprazole, amiodarone, or amlodipine. Our study suggests that the application of TDM might be especially worthwhile in about 30% of cases with the intent of avoiding either the risk of dose-dependent toxicity or that of treatment failure.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document