scholarly journals Biogenerics 2007: How far have we come?

2008 ◽  
Vol 14 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
John Tucker ◽  
Seth Yakatan ◽  
Stan Yakatan

The recent approval of a follow-on version of Pfizer's Genotropin (recombinant human growth hormone) signalled the beginning of the end of an era in which biopharmaceuticals enjoyed immunity from competition even after expiration of their patent protection. This paper describes many of the key scientific challenges facing the nascent ‘biogenerics’ industry and the evolving regulatory framework that will shape its competition with innovator companies. We describe key differences between the biogeneric and traditional generic drug business models and the M&A activity that been undertaken in pursuit of the expertise and resources needed to be competitive in this commercial space. We conclude with a discussion of the commercial opportunity presented by recent and upcoming European patent expirations and the challenges presented by competition from second-generation innovator products.


2020 ◽  
Vol 33 (12) ◽  
pp. 1577-1588
Author(s):  
George Paltoglou ◽  
Ioannis Dimitropoulos ◽  
Georgia Kourlaba ◽  
Evangelia Charmandari

AbstractObjectivesIdiopathic short stature (ISS) is a recognized, albeit a controversial indication for treatment with recombinant human growth hormone (rhGH).The objective of the present study was to conduct a systematic review of the literature and meta-analyses of selected studies about the use of rhGH in children with ISS on linear growth and adult height (AH).MethodsA systematic literature search was conducted to identify relevant studies published till February 28, 2017 in the following databases: Medline (PubMed), Scopus and Cochrane Central Registry of Controlled Trials. After exclusion of duplicate studies, 3,609 studies were initially identified. Of those, 3,497 studies were excluded during the process of assessing the title and/or the abstract. The remaining 112 studies were evaluated further by assessing the full text; 21 of them fulfilled all the criteria in order to be included in the current meta-analysis.ResultsChildren who received rhGH had significantly higher height increment at the end of the first year, an effect that persisted in the second year of treatment and achieved significantly higher AH than the control group. The difference between the two groups was equal to 5.3 cm (95% CI: 3.4–7 cm) for male and 4.7 cm (95% CI: 3.1–6.3 cm) for female patients.ConclusionIn children with ISS, treatment with rhGH improves short-term linear growth and increases AH compared with control subjects. However, the final decision should be made on an individual basis, following detailed diagnostic evaluation and careful consideration of both risks and benefits of rhGH administration.







2010 ◽  
Vol 13 ◽  
pp. e10-e11
Author(s):  
S. Ramos ◽  
B. Gray ◽  
M. Van Driel ◽  
L. Tajouri ◽  
S. Marshall-Gradisnik


1998 ◽  
Vol 105 (1) ◽  
pp. 44-57 ◽  
Author(s):  
Nicholas A. Tritos ◽  
Christos S. Mantzoros


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document