scholarly journals Problems of personal data protection when using Big Data technologies

2020 ◽  
Vol 18 (3) ◽  
pp. 438-442
Author(s):  
Varvara Bogdan ◽  
Elena Kirillova
Author(s):  
Artur Potiguara Carvalho ◽  
Fernanda Potiguara Carvalho ◽  
Edna Dias Canedo ◽  
Pedro Henrique Potiguara Carvalho

2016 ◽  
Vol 26 (1) ◽  
pp. 85-93
Author(s):  
Ryuichi Yamamoto

2020 ◽  
Vol 12 (1) ◽  
pp. 225-245
Author(s):  
Célia Zolynski

Objective ”“ The article contrasts the problem of Big Data with the possibilities and limits of personal data protection. It is an original contribution to the academic discussion about the regulation of the Internet and the management of algorithms, focusing on Big Data. Methodology/approach/design ”“ The article provides bibliographic research on the opposition between Big Data and personal data protection, focusing on European Union law and French law. From the research is possible to identify regulatory alternatives do Big Data, whether legal-administrative nature or technological nature. Findings ”“ The article enlightens that, in addition to the traditional regulatory options, based on the law, there are technological options for regulating Big Data and algorithms. The article goes through an analysis of administrative performance, such as France’s CNIL (Commission nationale informatique et libertés, CNIL), to show that it has limits. Thus, the article concludes that there is a need to build a new type of regulation, one that is open to the inputs of regulated parties and civil society, in the form of new co-regulatory arrangements. Practical implications ”“ The article has an obvious application since the production of legal solutions for Internet regulation requires combining them with technological solutions. Brazil and several Latin American countries are experiencing this agenda, as they are building institutions and solutions to solve the dilemma of personal data protection. Originality/value ”“ The article clarifies several parts of the General Data Protection Regulation (EU Regulation 2016/679) and its applicability to Big Data. These new types of data processing impose several legal and regulatory challenges, whose solutions cannot be trivial and will rely on new theories and practices.


2021 ◽  
Vol 13 (20) ◽  
pp. 11459
Author(s):  
Szu-Chuang Li ◽  
Yi-Wen Chen ◽  
Yennun Huang

The development of big data analysis technologies has changed how organizations work. Tech giants, such as Google and Facebook, are well positioned because they possess not only big data sets but also the in-house capability to analyze them. For small and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs), which have limited resources, capacity, and a relatively small collection of data, the ability to conduct data analysis collaboratively is key. Personal data protection regulations have become stricter due to incidents of private data being leaked, making it more difficult for SMEs to perform interorganizational data analysis. This problem can be resolved by anonymizing the data such that reidentifying an individual is no longer a concern or by deploying technical procedures that enable interorganizational data analysis without the exchange of actual data, such as data deidentification, data synthesis, and federated learning. Herein, we compared the technical options and their compliance with personal data protection regulations from several countries and regions. Using the EU’s GDPR (General Data Protection Regulation) as the main point of reference, technical studies, legislative studies, related regulations, and government-sponsored reports from various countries and regions were also reviewed. Alignment of the technical description with the government regulations and guidelines revealed that the solutions are compliant with the personal data protection regulations. Current regulations require “reasonable” privacy preservation efforts from data controllers; potential attackers are not assumed to be experts with knowledge of the target data set. This means that relevant requirements can be fulfilled without considerably sacrificing data utility. However, the potential existence of an extremely knowledgeable adversary when the stakes of data leakage are high still needs to be considered carefully.


2021 ◽  
Vol 6 (5) ◽  
pp. 203-212
Author(s):  
Atiqah Azman ◽  
Nur Shaura Azrin Binti Azman ◽  
Nurul Sahira Binti Kamal Azwan ◽  
Sherie Aneesa Binti Johary Al Bakry ◽  
Wan Nur Afiqah Binti Wan Daud ◽  
...  

Big Data has revolutionized the process of online activities such as marketing and advertisement based on individual preferences in the eCommerce industry. In Malaysia, the integration of Big Data in the commercial and business environment is keenly felt by establishing the National Big Data Analytics Framework catalyzing further economic growth in all sectors. However, the distinct features of Big Data spawn issues relating to privacy, such as data profiling, lack of transparency regarding privacy policies, accidental disclosures of data, false data or false analytics results. Hence, this research provides an insight into the intersection between Big Data and an individual's fundamental rights. The trade-off between privacy breaching and preserving is becoming more intense due to the rapid advancement of Big Data. Suggesting comparative analysis method as the data analysis approach, the adequacy of the Malaysian Personal Data Protection Act 2010 (PDPA 2010) in governing the risks of Big Data is evaluated against the European Union General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR) in managing the risk arising from the integration of Big Data. This research is hoped to initiate the improvement to the legislative framework, provides fundamentals to the formulation of national policy, and creation of specific law on Big Data in Malaysia, which will subsequently benefit industrial players and stakeholders.


2018 ◽  
Vol 25 (1) ◽  
pp. 43-55 ◽  
Author(s):  
Menno Mostert ◽  
Annelien L. Bredenoord ◽  
Bart van der Slootb ◽  
Johannes J.M. van Delden

Abstract The right to privacy has usually been considered as the most prominent fundamental right to protect in data-intensive (Big Data) health research. Within the European Union (eu), however, the right to data protection is gaining relevance as a separate fundamental right that should in particular be protected by data protection law. This paper discusses three differences between these two fundamental rights, which are relevant to data-intensive health research. Firstly, the rights based on the right to data protection are of a less context-sensitive nature and easier to enforce. Secondly, the positive obligation to protect personal data requires a more proactive approach by the eu and its Member States. Finally, it guarantees a more comprehensive system of personal data protection. In conclusion, we argue that a comprehensive system of data protection, including research-specific safeguards, is essential to compensate for the loss of individual control in data-intensive health research.


2020 ◽  
Vol 10 (5) ◽  
pp. 133-135
Author(s):  
A.A. Vasiliev ◽  
Yu.V. Pechatnova ◽  
Yu.V. Pechatnova

The article deals with the legal-environmental problems of personal data protection related to the use of artificial intelligence-based programs of information collection, processing and storage. The normative and legal acts on personal data protection are presented, attention is paid to the international experience of legal regulation of this field. The scope of the changes that have occurred in the field of personal data protection due to the appearance and rapid increase of the "Big Data". The materials of the jurisprudence on the commercialization of the "Big Data" and, as a consequence, the violation of the existing legal regime of personal data protection are analyzed. In conclusion, a legal assessment of the risks of deanonymization of personal data and possible options to address the problem of implementation of personal data legislation in an era of rapid development of Big Data are proposed.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document