What Do Mathematics Teachers Think about the High School Geometry Controversy?

1975 ◽  
Vol 68 (6) ◽  
pp. 486-493
Author(s):  
George Gearhart
Keyword(s):  
High School ◽  
Secondary School ◽  
Mathematics Teachers ◽  
School Mathematics ◽  
Secondary School Mathematics ◽  
High School Geometry ◽  
School Geometry

A survey of the attitudes of secondary school mathematics teachers toward geometry.

Notes and News

1920 ◽  
Vol 13 (1) ◽  
pp. 39-44
Keyword(s):  
High School ◽  
Secondary School ◽  
Mathematics Teachers ◽  
School Mathematics ◽  
National Council ◽  
High School Mathematics ◽  
Secondary School Mathematics ◽  
Local Organizations ◽  
Central Organization

A realization of the need of a central organization to foster the interests of high school mathematics and to secure a greater degree of co-operation between individual teachers and between local associations of teachers interested in secondary school mathematics impelled a group of mathematics teachers to assemble at Cleveland last February at the time of the meeting of the Department of Superintendence of the N. E. A. There were present at this meeting 127 teachers of mathematics representing twenty states and as many local organizations. At that time The National Council of Teachers of Mathematics was formed. A constitution was adopted and the following officers elected

Connecting Research to Teaching: Count on Number Theory to Inspire Proof

2009 ◽  
Vol 103 (4) ◽  
pp. 298-304
Author(s):  
Anne Larson Quinn
Keyword(s):  
High School ◽  
Number Theory ◽  
Secondary School ◽  
Secondary School Students ◽  
School Mathematics ◽  
School Students ◽  
High School Geometry ◽  
Mathematical Proofs ◽  
School Geometry ◽  
Principles And Standards

Many students find proofs frustrating, and teachers struggle with how to help students write proofs. In fact, it is well documented that most students who have studied proofs in high school geometry courses do not master them and do not understand their function (Battista 2007; Harel and Sowder 2007). And yet, according to NCTM's Principles and Standards for School Mathematics(2000), “By the end of secondary school, students should be able to understand and produce mathematical proofs … and should appreciate the value of such arguments” (p. 56).

Experimental Programs: High school geometry via ruler-and-protractor axioms— report on a classroom trial

1961 ◽  
Vol 54 (5) ◽  
pp. 353-360
Author(s):  
Max S. Bell
Keyword(s):  
High School ◽  
Secondary School ◽  
Curriculum Reform ◽  
Past Experience ◽  
Secondary School Mathematics ◽  
High School Geometry ◽  
Solid Geometry ◽  
School Geometry ◽  
Twelfth Grade ◽  
The Stability

There is considerable talk these days about curriculum “reform” in secondary- school mathematics. From our past experience, however, we can infer that such reforms will be very difficult to implement; witness, for example, the stability of solid geometry as a semester course in the twelfth grade despite repeated recommendations over a number of years for change to something more fruitful and useful.

scholarly journals VALIDATION OF MATHEMATICS TEACHING PRACTICE INSTRUMENTS AMONG SECONDARY SCHOOL MATHEMATICS TEACHERS: EXPLORATORY FACTOR ANALYSIS (EFA)

2020 ◽  
Vol 5 (36) ◽  
pp. 56-69
Author(s):  
Norkumalasari Othman ◽  
Nor Hasnida Che Md Ghazali ◽  
Mohd Nazir Md Zabit
Keyword(s):  
Factor Analysis ◽  
Secondary School ◽  
Mathematics Teachers ◽  
Mathematics Teaching ◽  
Teaching Practice ◽  
School Mathematics ◽  
Chi Square ◽  
Secondary School Mathematics ◽  
Bartlett Test ◽  
Value Measure

This study aims to review the instruments of mathematics teaching practice among secondary school mathematics teachers. A total of 100 mathematics teachers were involved as respondents in this study. The data were analyzed descriptively by access to Alpha Cronbach's reliability and EFA analysis using SPSS software. The results of the analysis show that the Alpha Cronbach value is 0.934 which is more than 0.60. Results from the exploration factor analysis show four factors with Eigenvalues greater than 1.0. The KMO value (Kaiser-Meyer-Olkin) 0.867 > 0.6 indicates the items in the variable of attitude towards math are sufficient for inter-correlation. While the Bartlett Test was significant (Chi-Square 1521.621, p <0.05), an anti-image value (Measure of Sampling Adequacy, MSA) for items correlation exceeded 0.6. However, there are three items that need to be removed because the values obtained are less than 0.60, which were the items G11, G14, and G18. The value of the total variance explained by these three factors was 62.76 percent. Therefore, the overall findings indicate that the items for mathematics teaching practice instruments can measure and answer the study objectives.

Examining the Recruitment, Placement, and Career Trajectories of Secondary Mathematics Teachers Prepared for High-Need Schools

2019 ◽  
Vol 121 (2) ◽  
pp. 1-36
Author(s):  
William Zahner ◽  
Suzanne Chapin ◽  
Rich Levine ◽  
Lingjun A. He ◽  
Robert Afonso
Keyword(s):  
Secondary School ◽  
Mathematics Teachers ◽  
Early Career ◽  
School Mathematics ◽  
The Other ◽  
Attrition Rate ◽  
Secondary School Mathematics ◽  
Stem Majors ◽  
Career Trajectories ◽  
High Need Schools

Background School leaders are challenged by the relatively limited supply and high turnover of qualified secondary school mathematics teachers. In response, policy makers and teacher educators have developed various pathways and incentives to recruit, train, place, and support highly qualified mathematics teachers to work in hard-to-staff schools. Focus of Study In this study, we investigate the recruitment, placement, and early career trajectories of 158 Grades 6–12 mathematics teachers from two preparation programs focused on staffing “high-need” schools in the same region. Setting The contrasting programs were both supported by the same university in the Northeast United States. Participants & Programs The participants were 158 secondary school (Grades 6–12) mathematics teachers. Of these, 48 were recruited and prepared through a teacher education program with financial support from the National Science Foundation-funded Robert Noyce Teacher Scholarship Program. The other 110 school mathematics teachers were recruited and trained through the Greater Boston office of Teach For America. Both programs required two years of service in high-need schools. Research Design In this study, we used a comparative design. Descriptive profiles of teachers from each program were created. Then, participants’ early career trajectories were compared using logistic regression and survival analysis. Data Collection and Analysis We administered a longitudinal survey and created a database combining survey data and each program's administrative data. Conclusions Our data illustrate that the Noyce scholarship-supported pathway was generally successful in recruiting individuals with STEM majors, training them to be mathematics teachers, and placing those individuals as secondary school mathematics teachers in high-need schools. The comparison of the scholarship-pathway teachers with the secondary school mathematics teachers in the alternative-certification pathway provides a useful contrast. On the one hand, the alternatively certified secondary school mathematics teachers were less likely than the scholarship-pathway teachers to have STEM majors, and the attrition rate for the alternatively prepared teachers was higher than the attrition rate for the scholarship-supported teachers, particularly after they had completed the two-year service requirement. On the other hand, the alternative-certification program recruited a more diverse pool of potential teachers and placed these teachers in schools serving a higher proportion of low-SES students.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document