Participatory Assessment of Biorational Module for Pod Borer Management in Chickpea Ecosystem

Author(s):  
Uma Sah ◽  
Hem Saxena ◽  
G.K. Sujayanand ◽  
P. Duraimurugan ◽  
Rajesh Kumar
Data in Brief ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 34 ◽  
pp. 106638
Author(s):  
Nor Azlan Nor Muhammad ◽  
Intan Azlinda Ramlee ◽  
Diana Mohd Nor ◽  
Mahasakthy Vijeyasri Satyavenathan ◽  
Nur Lina Rahmat ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Rna Seq ◽  

2021 ◽  
Vol 95 ◽  
Author(s):  
R. Pervez ◽  
U. Rao

Abstract The legume pod-borer, Maruca vitrata Fabricius (Lepidoptera: Crambidae) (LPB), is an important insect pest of pigeon pea. Chemical pesticides are generally employed to manage this pest, but because of the soil residue issues and other environmental hazards associated with their use, biopesticides are also in demand. Another benign alternative is to use entomopathogenic nematodes (EPNs) to manage this vital pest. In the present study, the infectivity of ten native EPNs was evaluated against LPB by assessing their penetration and production in the LPB. The effectiveness of the promising EPNs against second-, third- and fourth-instar LPB larvae was also studied. Heterorhabditis sp. (Indian Agricultural Research Institute-Entomopathogenic Nematodes Rashid Pervez (IARI-EPN RP) 06) and Oscheius sp. (IARI-EPN RP 08) were found to be most pathogenic to LPB, resulting in about 100% mortality within 72 h, followed by Steinernema sp. (IARI-EPN RP 03 and 09). Oscheius sp. (IARI-EPN RP 04) was found to be the least pathogenic to LPB larva with 67% mortality. Maximum penetration was exhibited by Heterorhabditis sp. (IARI-EPN RP 06) followed by Oscheius sp. (IARI-EPN RP 08), whereas the lowest rate of penetration was exhibited by Oscheius sp. (IARI-EPN RP 01). The highest rate of production was observed with Oscheius sp. (IARI-EPN RP 08), followed by Oscheius sp. (IARI-EPN RP 04 and 10). Among the tested instars of the LPB larvae, second-instar larvae were more susceptible to EPNs, followed by third- and fourth-instar larvae. The results indicate that Heterorhabditis sp. (IARI-EPN RP 06) and Oscheius sp. (IARI-EPN RP 08) have a good potential to the manage LPB.


2021 ◽  
Vol 40 (3) ◽  
pp. 583-594
Author(s):  
Anil Kumar ◽  
Ranjana Jaiwal ◽  
Rohini Sreevathsa ◽  
Darshna Chaudhary ◽  
Pawan K. Jaiwal

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Prameela Vanambathina ◽  
Rao C. N. Rachaputi ◽  
Yasmina Sultanbawa ◽  
Anh Dao Thi Phan ◽  
Robert J. Henry ◽  
...  

1970 ◽  
Vol 16 (1) ◽  
pp. 46-56 ◽  
Author(s):  
K.P. Acharya ◽  
K.R. Goutam ◽  
B.K. Acharya ◽  
G. Gautam

The Community Forestry has been the most effective means of managing common forest resources in Nepal. Besides rehabilitating degraded hills, improving environment and contributing to the rural livelihoods, community forestry is claimed to be a major means of biodiversity conservation. It is also argued that the prevalent approach of community forest management threats to the conservation of biodiversity. This paper is based on the findings from two community forest user groups from Central Nepal and argues that the users’ innovative practices of active forest management favor biodiversity conservation. The study has documented users’ innovations to conserve biodiversity in community managed forests. Key words: Nepal, community forestry, biodiversity conservation and livelihoods Banko Janakari Vol.16(1) 2006 pp46-56


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document