scholarly journals Partnership between head and neck surgeon and reconstructive surgeon in free jejunum transfer after total pharyngolaryngectomy-from a reconstruction point of view-

Toukeibu Gan ◽  
2008 ◽  
Vol 34 (3) ◽  
pp. 245-248
Author(s):  
Minoru Sakuraba ◽  
Hiroyuki Daiko ◽  
Shimpei Miyamoto ◽  
Ryuichi Hayashi ◽  
Mitsuru Ebihara ◽  
...  
1993 ◽  
Vol 19 (3) ◽  
pp. 325-329
Author(s):  
Kunihko Nagahara ◽  
Yasutaka Yamane ◽  
Kazuhiro Yamamoto ◽  
Hachio Minami ◽  
Tetsuya Tukamoto

2018 ◽  
Vol 29 ◽  
pp. vii22
Author(s):  
Torahiko Nakashima ◽  
Hideoki Uryu ◽  
Tomoya Masuda ◽  
Hozumi Shimokawa ◽  
Keita Uchino

Viruses ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 13 (6) ◽  
pp. 1173
Author(s):  
Markus Hoffmann ◽  
Elgar Susanne Quabius

Human papillomaviruses (HPV) cause a subset of head and neck cancers (HNSCC). HPV16 predominantly signs responsible for approximately 10% of all HNSCC and over 50% of tonsillar [T]SCCs. Prevalence rates depend on several factors, such as the geographical region where patients live, possibly due to different social and sexual habits. Smoking plays an important role, with non-smoking patients being mostly HPV-positive and smokers being mostly HPV-negative. This is of unparalleled clinical relevance, as the outcome of (non-smoking) HPV-positive patients is significantly better, albeit with standard and not with de-escalated therapies. The results of the first prospective de-escalation studies have dampened hopes that similar superior survival can be achieved with de-escalated therapy. In this context, it is important to note that the inclusion of p16INK4A (a surrogate marker for HPV-positivity) in the 8th TMN-classification has only prognostic, not therapeutic, intent. To avoid misclassification, highest precision in determining HPV-status is of utmost importance. Whenever possible, PCR-based methods, still referred to as the "gold standard”, should be used. New diagnostic antibodies represent some hope, e.g., to detect primaries and recurrences early. Prophylactic HPV vaccination should lead to a decline in HPV-driven HNSCC as well. This review discusses the above aspects in detail.


2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kathrin Kienapfel ◽  
Iris Bachmann ◽  
Lara Piccolo ◽  
Dominik Ruess ◽  
Annik Gmel

Summary Head and neck position (HNP) has been identified in literature as important influence on wellbeing. It was investigated in ridden elite dressage horses whether there is a relation between the HNP, ethological indicators and the grading in the warm-up area and in the test. 49 starters (83%) of a Grand-Prix Special (CDIO5 *) as part of the CHIO in Aachen 2018 and 2019 were examined. For each horse-rider pair, HNP (angle at vertical (AT), poll angle (PA), neck angel (NA)) used were analysed as well as conflict behavior for 3 minutes each in warm-up area and test. 6571 individual frames were used. The noseline was carried significantly less behind the vertical in test vs. warm-up (5.43 ° ± 4.19 vs. 11.01 ° ± 4.54 behind the vertical; T = 34.0; p < 0.05). The horses showed significantly less conflict behavior in the test vs. warm-up (123 ± 54 vs. 160 ± 75) (T = 76.00; p < 0.01). In the latter, a smaller PA and more defensive behaviour of the horses was observed compared to the test. A correlation between the grading of test and HNP was found (R = 0.38; p < 0.05). The further the noseline was behind the vertical, the higher was the chance of a good rating. The higher riders were ranked in the “FEI world ranking”, the higher were their marks in the competition (2018: r = -0.69, p < 0.05; 2019: r = -0.76, p < 0.05). Horses of riders higher in world ranking tended to show more unusual oral behaviour (r = -0.30, p < 0.05), and a noseline stronger behind the vertical (r = -0.37, p < 0.05) resulting in a smaller NA (r = 0.43, p < 0.05). This are from the point of view of animal welfare problematic results.


Biomedicines ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 9 (8) ◽  
pp. 1045
Author(s):  
Morena Fasano ◽  
Francesco Perri ◽  
Carminia Maria Della Corte ◽  
Raimondo Di Liello ◽  
Giuseppina Della Vittoria Scarpati ◽  
...  

Head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC) is characterized by a high mortality rate owing to very few available oncological treatments. For many years, a combination of platinum-based chemotherapy and anti-EGFR antibody cetuximab has represented the only available option for first-line therapy. Recently, immunotherapy has been presented an alternative for positive PD-L1 HNSCC. However, the oncologists’ community foresees that a new therapeutic era is approaching. In fact, no-chemo options and some molecular targets are on the horizon. This narrative review addresses past, present, and future therapeutic options for HNSCC from a translational point of view.


2016 ◽  
Vol 89 (1067) ◽  
pp. 20160217 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jon Cacicedo ◽  
Arturo Navarro ◽  
Olga del Hoyo ◽  
Alfonso Gomez-Iturriaga ◽  
Filippo Alongi ◽  
...  

2015 ◽  
Vol 2015 ◽  
pp. 1-4 ◽  
Author(s):  
Francesca De Felice ◽  
Daniela Musio ◽  
Vincenzo Tombolini

Follow-up program in squamous cell carcinoma of head and neck district is crucial to detect locoregional recurrence and second primary tumors and to manage treatment toxicities. The choice of the appropriate frequency of visits and imaging modality can be troublesome. Details of timing surveillance and type of diagnostic procedure are still not well defined. This review highlights the problem from a clinician’s point of view.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document