Salvage surgery of hypopharyngeal carcinoma with local recurrence after chemoradiotherapy

Introduction: Limb salvage surgery involves all of the surgical methods to achieve the eradication of a malignant neoplasm and restoration of the limb with a satisfactory oncologic, functional, and cosmetic outcome. Rates of local recurrence are 4% to 10%. There is a chance of local recurrence from the contamination of biopsy path. Neoadjuvant chemotherapy has a guarding effect on managing neoplasm infiltration at the biopsy location.Case Presentation: An 18 year old male experienced a new painless lump at his right anterior thigh with size about 5 cm in diameter since 5 months ago. Previously, he underwent limb salvage surgery with megaprosthesis about 6 months ago due to osteosarcoma at his right distal femur. He also got neoadjuvant and adjuvant chemotherapy for 6 cycles. Mass removal was done and 1.5 cm mass in diameter was found within quadriceps muscle with a soft consistency and well-defined border from the previous biopsy site that had not been resected. The specimen result was osteosarcoma surrounded by tumor-free tissue. Postoperatively, he still had the same range of motion function as before.Conclusions: We need to consider the previously contaminated biopsy path that could lead to local recurrence. Factors that affect the prediction of the recurrent disease are the disease-free time period, location of recurrence and histological response to therapy and the capability to achieve total surgical removal. Tumor removal followed by the local radiation and chemotherapy is the preferred treatment for recurrence.

Download Full-text

Preoperative surgical risk stratification in osteosarcoma based on the proximity to the major vessels

The Bone & Joint Journal ◽

10.1302/0301-620x.101b8.bjj-2018-0963.r1 ◽

2019 ◽

Vol 101-B (8) ◽

pp. 1024-1031 ◽

Cited By ~ 4

Author(s):

T. Fujiwara ◽

M. R. Medellin ◽

A. Sambri ◽

Y. Tsuda ◽

J. Balko ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Overall Survival ◽

Local Recurrence ◽

Blood Vessels ◽

Limb Salvage ◽

Local Control ◽

Salvage Surgery ◽

Limb Salvage Surgery ◽

Poor Prognostic Factor ◽

Type 3

Aims The aim of this study was to determine the risk of local recurrence and survival in patients with osteosarcoma based on the proximity of the tumour to the major vessels. Patients and Methods A total of 226 patients with high-grade non-metastatic osteosarcoma in the limbs were investigated. Median age at diagnosis was 15 years (4 to 67) with the ratio of male to female patients being 1.5:1. The most common site of the tumour was the femur (n = 103) followed by tibia (n = 66). The vascular proximity was categorized based on the preoperative MRI after neoadjuvant chemotherapy into four types: type 1 > 5 mm; type 2 ≤ 5 mm, > 0 mm; type 3 attached; type 4 surrounded. Results Limb salvage rate based on the proximity type was 92%, 88%, 51%, and 0% for types 1 to 4, respectively, and the overall survival at five years was 82%, 77%, 57%, and 67%, respectively (p < 0.001). Local recurrence rate in patients with limb-salvage surgery was 7%, 8%, and 22% for the types 1 to 3, respectively (p = 0.041), and local recurrence at the perivascular area was observed in 1% and 4% for type 2 and 3, respectively. The mean microscopic margin to the major vessels was 6.9 mm, 3.0 mm, and 1.4 mm for types 1 to 3, respectively. In type 3, local recurrence-free survival with limb salvage was significantly poorer compared with amputation (p = 0.025), while the latter offered no overall survival benefit. In this group of patients, factors such as good response to chemotherapy or limited vascular attachment to less than half circumference or longitudinal 10 mm reduced the risk of local recurrence. Conclusion The proximity of osteosarcoma to major blood vessels is a poor prognostic factor for local control and survival. Amputation offers better local control for tumours attached to the blood vessels but does not improve survival. Limb salvage surgery offers similar local control if the tumour attachment to blood vessels is limited. Cite this article: Bone Joint J 2019;101-B:1024–1031.

Download Full-text