scholarly journals Effect of a Diaphragm Opening Process on Flow Condition in Shock Tunnel

2021 ◽  
Vol 25 (6) ◽  
pp. 20-28
Author(s):  
Seihwan Kim
Keyword(s):  
Flow Condition ◽  
Shock Tunnel ◽  
Opening Process

Post Flight Analysis of SHEFEX I: Shock Tunnel Testing and Related CFD Analysis

2009 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jan Martinez Schramm ◽  
Alexander Wagner ◽  
Jeremy Wolfram ◽  
Klaus Hannemann ◽  
Tarik Barth ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Shock Tunnel ◽  
Cfd Analysis ◽  
Tunnel Testing

Krypton Tagging Velocimetry (KTV) Investigation in the Caltech T5 Reflected-Shock Tunnel

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Nick J. Parziale ◽  
Muhammad A. Mustafa ◽  
David Shekhtman ◽  
Joanna M. Austin ◽  
Wesley M. Yu
Keyword(s):  
Shock Tunnel ◽  
Reflected Shock

Development of a Direct-Connect Testing Capability in the HyperTERP Shock Tunnel

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Xiu Yi Pee ◽  
Graeme Gillespie ◽  
Stuart J. Laurence
Keyword(s):  
Shock Tunnel

Experimental Study at Hypersonic Shock Tunnel of A 3D Prototyped Scramjet Powered with Hydrogen

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ronaldo Cardoso ◽  
Paulo Toro ◽  
Israel Rêgo ◽  
Thiago Victor Cordeiro Marcos ◽  
Pedro Souza
Keyword(s):  
Experimental Study ◽  
Shock Tunnel ◽  
Hypersonic Shock ◽  
Hypersonic Shock Tunnel

Calibration 7" – Cutthroat Flume as New Size for Discharge Measurement at Free Flow Condition

2020 ◽  
Vol 38 (12A) ◽  
pp. 1783-1789
Author(s):  
Jaafar S. Matooq ◽  
Muna J. Ibraheem
Keyword(s):  
Steady State ◽  
Flow Condition ◽  
Laboratory Experiments ◽  
Free Flow ◽  
Experimental Program ◽  
Steady State Flow ◽  
Empirical Formulas ◽  
State Flow ◽  
Operation Conditions ◽  
Throat Width

 This paper aims to conduct a series of laboratory experiments in case of steady-state flow for the new size 7 ̋ throat width (not presented before) of the cutthroat flume. For this size, five different lengths were adopted 0.535, 0.46, 0.40, 0.325 and 0.27m these lengths were adopted based on the limitations of the available flume. The experimental program has been followed to investigate the hydraulic characteristic and introducing the calibrated formula for free flow application within the discharge ranged between 0.006 and 0.025 m3/s. The calibration result showed that, under suitable operation conditions, the suggested empirical formulas can accurately predict the values of discharge within an error ± 3%.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document