REAL GAS EFFECT ON TRANSIENT FLOW PHENOMENA IN A REFLECTION SHOCK TUNNEL

2005 ◽  
Vol 12 (2) ◽  
pp. 175-195
Author(s):  
Jr-Ming Miao ◽  
Chun-Chi Li ◽  
Fuh-Lin Lih
2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yufei Chen ◽  
Juliana Y. Leung ◽  
Changbao Jiang ◽  
Andrew K. Wojtanowicz

Abstract The past decade has seen the rapid development of shale gas across the world, as the record-breaking success and on-going surge of commercial shale gas production in such unconventional reservoirs pose a tremendous potential to meet the global energy supply. However, questions have been raised about the intricate gas transport mechanisms in the shale matrix, of which the gas slippage phenomenon is one of the key mechanisms for enhancing the fluid transport capacity and, therefore, the overall gas production. Given that shale reservoirs are often naturally deposited in the deep underground formations at high pressure and temperature conditions (much deeper than most typical conventional deposits), the real gas effect cannot be ignored as gas properties may vary significantly under such conditions. The purpose of this study is thus to investigate the real gas effect on the gas slippage phenomenon in shale by taking into account the gas compressibility factor (Z) and Knudsen number (Kn). This study begins with a specific determination of Z for natural gas at various pressures and temperatures under the real gas effect, followed by several calculations of the gas molecular mean free path at in-situ conditions. Following this, the real gas effect on gas slippage phenomenon in shale is specifically analyzed by examining the change in Knudsen number. Also discussed are the permeability deviation from Darcy flux (non-Darcy flow) due to the combination of gas slippage and real gas effect and the specific range of pressure and pore size for gas slippage phenomenon in shale reservoirs. The results show that the gas molecular mean free path generally increases with decreasing pressure, especially at relatively low pressures (< 20 MPa). And, increasing temperature will cause the gas molecular mean free path to rise, also at low pressures. Knudsen number of an ideal gas is greater than that of a real gas; while lower than that of a real gas as pressure continues to rise. That is, the real gas effect suppresses the gas slippage phenomenon at low pressures, while enhancing it at high pressures. Also, Darcy’s law starts deviating when Kn > 0.01 and becomes invalid at high Knudsen numbers, and this deviation increases with decreasing pore size. No matter how pore size varies, this deviation increases with decreasing pressure, meaning that the gas slippage effect is significant at low pressures. Finally, slip flow dominates in the various gas transport mechanisms given the typical range of pressure and pore size in shale reservoirs (1 MPa < P < 80 MPa; 3 nm < d < 3000 nm). Gas transport in shale is predominantly controlled by the slippage effect that mostly occurs in micro- or meso-pores (10 to 200 nm). Moreover, considering the real gas effect would improve the accuracy for determining the specific pressure range of the gas slippage phenomenon in shale.


Author(s):  
Hengjie Xu ◽  
Pengyun Song ◽  
Wenyuan Mao ◽  
Qiangguo Deng

By taking carbon dioxide and hydrogen as lubricating gas, respectively, this paper presents an analysis on the pressure characteristics and temperature distribution of spiral groove dry gas seal which influenced by real gas effect under choked flow condition. Numerical results show that the deviation between real gas and ideal gas, which expressed by the deviation degree between compressibility factor Z and 1, is the main reason for real gas effect affecting sealing performance. Compared with ideal gas model, real gas effect raises exit pressure, opening force, leakage rate, Mach number in dam region, and temperature for carbon dioxide ( Z < 1), while it decreases those characteristics for hydrogen ( Z > 1) under the same operating conditions. In addition, choked flow effect increases opening force and reduces leakage rate and temperature-drop between entrance and exit of sealing clearance. Meanwhile, it may cause an unstable behavior for the seal.


2011 ◽  
Vol 361-363 ◽  
pp. 603-606
Author(s):  
Yu Qiang Dai ◽  
Jiu Peng Zou ◽  
Che Zhu ◽  
Jin Tao Wu ◽  
Da Peng Hu

The unsteady flow behaviors in devices like gas wave machines, wave rotor refrigerators and so on are complex due to real gas effect at high operational pressure and low temperature. In this work, a detail computational model for unsteady flow analysis of real natural gases is established. The real effect on unsteady behaviors of natural gases in shock tubes have been studied extensively. Results show that the non-classical flow of the gases will not exist. The discipline of reflection and refraction of various gas waves or discontinuities remain unchanged for natural gases. Attention should be paid only to the deviations between perfect gas model and real gas model for gasdynamic waves.


2011 ◽  
Vol 2011.24 (0) ◽  
pp. 513-514
Author(s):  
Tsubasa OHSHIMA ◽  
Hirotoshi YANAGI ◽  
Yasuhide OKAZAKI ◽  
Koji MORINISHI

AIAA Journal ◽  
1976 ◽  
Vol 14 (12) ◽  
pp. 1766-1768 ◽  
Author(s):  
Peter K. Wu

2013 ◽  
Vol 724-725 ◽  
pp. 1293-1300
Author(s):  
Jing Tang ◽  
Wen Chuan Wang ◽  
Xiang Jun Fang ◽  
Shi Long Liu ◽  
Wen Long Sun

This paper aims to investigate real gases energy separation effect such as real natural gas, CH4 and C2H4 in vortex tube. Energy separation phenomena of real natural gas (RNG) were investigated by means of three-dimensional Computational Fluid Dynamics (CFD) method. Flow fields of ideal natural gas (ING), or RNG in low and high pressure were simulated. The results main factors were found that affect the separation effect. At the same time, this paper has illustrated the effect and tendency of energy separation with real gas in the tube under the same cold mass fraction and pressure ratio. The results show low pressure ideal gas and real gas energy separation effect difference about 3-4°C, the real gas effect is not obvious; High pressure real natural gas (HPRNG) and ideal gas (HPING) effect difference is 13-14°C, the real gas effect is obvious; CH4 (LRCH4) and C2H4 (HRC2H4) energy separation effect is obvious and effect of real gas is generated.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document