scholarly journals Group Discussion Information Search 2

2008 ◽  
Vol 55 (4) ◽  
pp. 346-347
Author(s):  
Yukiko HIROSE
2008 ◽  
Vol 39 (2) ◽  
pp. 203-223 ◽  
Author(s):  
Andreas Mojzisch ◽  
Stefan Schulz-Hardt ◽  
Rudolf Kerschreiter ◽  
Dieter Frey

2008 ◽  
Vol 55 (4) ◽  
pp. 345-346
Author(s):  
Chiaki TAKASAKI

2008 ◽  
Vol 55 (4) ◽  
pp. 348-349
Author(s):  
Chika SAIJO

2008 ◽  
Vol 55 (4) ◽  
pp. 349-350
Author(s):  
Yoshiko SAKURAI

2020 ◽  
Vol 19 (2) ◽  
pp. 63-74
Author(s):  
Klaus Moser ◽  
Hans-Georg Wolff ◽  
Roman Soucek

Abstract. Escalation of commitment occurs when a course of action is continued despite repeated drawbacks (e.g., maintaining an employment relationship despite severe performance problems). We analyze process accountability (PA) as a de-escalation technique that helps to discontinue a failing course of action and show how time moderates both the behavioral and cognitive processes involved: (1) Because sound decisions should be based on (hopefully unbiased) information search, which requires time to gather, the effect of PA on de-escalation increases over time. (2) Because continuing information search creates behavioral commitment, the debiasing effect of PA on information search diminishes over time. (3) Consistent with the tunnel vision notion, the effects of less biased information search on de-escalation decrease over time.


2018 ◽  
Vol 17 (3) ◽  
pp. 155-160 ◽  
Author(s):  
Daniel Dürr ◽  
Ute-Christine Klehe

Abstract. Faking has been a concern in selection research for many years. Many studies have examined faking in questionnaires while far less is known about faking in selection exercises with higher fidelity. This study applies the theory of planned behavior (TPB; Ajzen, 1991 ) to low- (interviews) and high-fidelity (role play, group discussion) exercises, testing whether the TPB predicts reported faking behavior. Data from a mock selection procedure suggests that candidates do report to fake in low- and high-fidelity exercises. Additionally, the TPB showed good predictive validity for faking in a low-fidelity exercise, yet not for faking in high-fidelity exercises.


1969 ◽  
Author(s):  
Carl J. Lange ◽  
Carl H. Rittenhouse ◽  
Richard C. Atkinson
Keyword(s):  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document