scholarly journals Some Lambda Calculus and Type Theory Formalized

1997 ◽  
Vol 4 (51) ◽  
Author(s):  
James McKinna ◽  
Robert Pollack
Keyword(s):  
Type Theory ◽  
Operational Semantics ◽  
Lambda Calculus ◽  
Type Systems ◽  
Formal Proof ◽  
Type Checking ◽  
Formal Development ◽  
Formal Definitions ◽  
Pure Type Systems ◽  
System F

"This paper is about our hobby." That is the first sentence of [MP93], the first report on our formal development of lambda calculus and type theory, written in autumn 1992. We have continued to pursue this hobby on and off ever since, and have developed a substantial body of formal knowledge, including Church-Rosser and standardization<br />theorems for beta reduction, and the basic theory of<br />Pure Type Systems (PTS) leading to the strengthening theorem and type checking algorithms for PTS. Some of this work is reported in [MP93, vBJMP94, Pol94b, Pol95]. In the present paper we survey this work, including some new proofs, and point out what we feel has been learned about the general issues of formalizing mathematics. On the technical side, we describe an abstract, and simplified, proof of standardization for beta reduction, not previously published, that does<br />not mention redex positions or residuals. On the general issues, we emphasize the search for formal definitions that are convenient for formal proof and convincingly represent the intended informal concepts. The LEGO Proof Development System [LP92] was used to check the work in an implementation of the Extended Calculus of Constructions<br />(ECC) with inductive types [Luo94]. LEGO is a refinement style<br />proof checker, publicly available by ftp and WWW, with a User's Manual [LP92] and a large collection of examples. Section 1.3 contains information on accessing the formal development described in this paper. Other interesting examples formalized in LEGO include program specification and data refinement [Luo91], strong normalization of System F [Alt93], synthetic domain theory [Reu95, Reu96], and operational semantics for imperative programs [Sch97].

scholarly journals Proofs for free

2012 ◽  
Vol 22 (2) ◽  
pp. 107-152 ◽  
Author(s):  
JEAN-PHILIPPE BERNARDY ◽  
PATRIK JANSSON ◽  
ROSS PATERSON
Keyword(s):  
Programming Language ◽  
Predicate Logic ◽  
Type Systems ◽  
Second Order ◽  
Pure Type ◽  
Parametric Polymorphism ◽  
Pure Type Systems ◽  
System F

AbstractReynolds' abstraction theorem (Reynolds, J. C. (1983) Types, abstraction and parametric polymorphism, Inf. Process.83(1), 513–523) shows how a typing judgement in System F can be translated into a relational statement (in second-order predicate logic) about inhabitants of the type. We obtain a similar result for pure type systems (PTSs): for any PTS used as a programming language, there is a PTS that can be used as a logic for parametricity. Types in the source PTS are translated to relations (expressed as types) in the target. Similarly, values of a given type are translated to proofs that the values satisfy the relational interpretation. We extend the result to inductive families. We also show that the assumption that every term satisfies the parametricity condition generated by its type is consistent with the generated logic.

scholarly journals Denotational semantics of recursive types in synthetic guarded domain theory

2018 ◽  
Vol 29 (3) ◽  
pp. 465-510 ◽  
Author(s):  
RASMUS E. MØGELBERG ◽  
MARCO PAVIOTTI
Keyword(s):  
Programming Languages ◽  
Type Theory ◽  
Operational Semantics ◽  
Lambda Calculus ◽  
Denotational Semantics ◽  
Domain Theory ◽  
Logical Relation ◽  
Dependent Type Theory ◽  
Semantics Of Programming Languages ◽  
Dependent Type

Just like any other branch of mathematics, denotational semantics of programming languages should be formalised in type theory, but adapting traditional domain theoretic semantics, as originally formulated in classical set theory to type theory has proven challenging. This paper is part of a project on formulating denotational semantics in type theories with guarded recursion. This should have the benefit of not only giving simpler semantics and proofs of properties such as adequacy, but also hopefully in the future to scale to languages with advanced features, such as general references, outside the reach of traditional domain theoretic techniques.Working inGuarded Dependent Type Theory(GDTT), we develop denotational semantics for Fixed Point Calculus (FPC), the simply typed lambda calculus extended with recursive types, modelling the recursive types of FPC using the guarded recursive types ofGDTT. We prove soundness and computational adequacy of the model inGDTTusing a logical relation between syntax and semantics constructed also using guarded recursive types. The denotational semantics is intensional in the sense that it counts the number of unfold-fold reductions needed to compute the value of a term, but we construct a relation relating the denotations of extensionally equal terms, i.e., pairs of terms that compute the same value in a different number of steps. Finally, we show how the denotational semantics of terms can be executed inside type theory and prove that executing the denotation of a boolean term computes the same value as the operational semantics of FPC.

Type-checking injective pure type systems

1999 ◽  
Vol 9 (6) ◽  
pp. 675-698 ◽  
Author(s):  
GILLES BARTHE
Keyword(s):  
Large Class ◽  
Type Systems ◽  
Type Checking ◽  
Pure Type ◽  
Complete Type ◽  
Pure Type Systems

Injective pure type systems form a large class of pure type systems for which one can compute by purely syntactic means two sorts elmt(Γ[mid ]M) and sort(Γ[mid ]M), where Γ is a pseudo-context and M is a pseudo-term, and such that for every sort s,formula hereBy eliminating the problematic clause in the (abstraction) rule in favor of constraints over elmt(.[mid ].) and sort(.[mid ].), we provide a sound and complete type-checking algorithm for injective pure type systems. In addition, we prove expansion postponement for a variant of injective pure type systems where the problematic clause in the (abstraction) rule is replaced in favor of constraints over elmt(.[mid ].) and sort(.[mid ].).

scholarly journals Mœbius: metaprogramming using contextual types: the stage where system f can pattern match on itself

2022 ◽  
Vol 6 (POPL) ◽  
pp. 1-27
Author(s):  
Junyoung Jang ◽  
Samuel Gélineau ◽  
Stefan Monnier ◽  
Brigitte Pientka
Keyword(s):  
Pattern Matching ◽  
Code Generation ◽  
Operational Semantics ◽  
Lambda Calculus ◽  
Full Potential ◽  
Variable Binding ◽  
Multi Level ◽  
Open Code ◽  
Type Preservation ◽  
System F

We describe the foundation of the metaprogramming language, Mœbius, which supports the generation of polymorphic code and, more importantly, the analysis of polymorphic code via pattern matching. Mœbius has two main ingredients: 1) we exploit contextual modal types to describe open code together with the context in which it is meaningful. In Mœbius, open code can depend on type and term variables (level 0) whose values are supplied at a later stage, as well as code variables (level 1) that stand for code templates supplied at a later stage. This leads to a multi-level modal lambda-calculus that supports System-F style polymorphism and forms the basis for polymorphic code generation. 2) we extend the multi-level modal lambda-calculus to support pattern matching on code. As pattern matching on polymorphic code may refine polymorphic type variables, we extend our type-theoretic foundation to generate and track typing constraints that arise. We also give an operational semantics and prove type preservation. Our multi-level modal foundation for Mœbius provides the appropriate abstractions for both generating and pattern matching on open code without committing to a concrete representation of variable binding and contexts. Hence, our work is a step towards building a general type-theoretic foundation for multi-staged metaprogramming that, on the one hand, enforces strong type guarantees and, on the other hand, makes it easy to generate and manipulate code. This will allow us to exploit the full potential of metaprogramming without sacrificing the reliability of and trust in the code we are producing and running.

Pure iso-type systems

2019 ◽  
Vol 29 ◽  
Author(s):  
YANPENG YANG ◽  
BRUNO C. D. S. OLIVEIRA
Keyword(s):  
Operational Semantics ◽  
Type System ◽  
Type Systems ◽  
Expressive Power ◽  
Functional Languages ◽  
Type Conversion ◽  
Type Checking ◽  
Parallel Reduction ◽  
The Cost ◽  
Typed Languages

Abstract Traditional designs for functional languages (such as Haskell or ML) have separate sorts of syntax for terms and types. In contrast, many dependently typed languages use a unified syntax that accounts for both terms and types. Unified syntax has some interesting advantages over separate syntax, including less duplication of concepts, and added expressiveness. However, integrating unrestricted general recursion in calculi with unified syntax is challenging when some level of type-level computation is present, since properties such as decidable type-checking are easily lost. This paper presents a family of calculi called pure iso-type systems (PITSs), which employs unified syntax, supports general recursion and preserves decidable type-checking. PITS is comparable in simplicity to pure type systems (PTSs), and is useful to serve as a foundation for functional languages that stand in-between traditional ML-like languages and fully blown dependently typed languages. In PITS, recursion and recursive types are completely unrestricted and type equality is simply based on alpha-equality, just like traditional ML-style languages. However, like most dependently typed languages, PITS uses unified syntax, naturally supporting many advanced type system features. Instead of implicit type conversion, PITS provides a generalization of iso-recursive types called iso-types. Iso-types replace the conversion rule typically used in dependently typed calculus and make every type-level computation explicit via cast operators. Iso-types avoid the complexity of explicit equality proofs employed in other approaches with casts. We study three variants of PITS that differ on the reduction strategy employed by the cast operators: call-by-name, call-by-value and parallel reduction. One key finding is that while using call-by-value or call-by-name reduction in casts loses some expressive power, it allows those variants of PITS to have simple and direct operational semantics and proofs. In contrast, the variant of PITS with parallel reduction retains the expressive power of PTS conversion, at the cost of a more complex metatheory.

scholarly journals Intersection Type Systems and Logics Related to the Meyer–Routley System B+

2012 ◽  
Vol 1 ◽  
Author(s):  
Martin Bunder
Keyword(s):  
Intuitionistic Logic ◽  
Type Theory ◽  
Lambda Calculus ◽  
Type Systems ◽  
Minimal Logic

Some, but not all, closed terms of the lambda calculus have types; these types are exactly the theorems of intuitionistic implicational logic. An extension of these simple (→) types to intersection (or →∧) types allows all closed lambda terms to have types. The corresponding →∧ logic, related to the Meyer–Routley minimal logic B+ (without ∨), is weaker than the →∧ fragment of intuitionistic logic. In this paper we provide an introduction to the above work and also determine the →∧ logics that correspond to certain interesting subsystems of the full →∧ type theory.

scholarly journals Reduction Strategies for Program Extraction

2018 ◽  
Vol 6 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Maribel Fernandez ◽  
Ian Mackie ◽  
Paula Severi ◽  
Nora Szasz
Keyword(s):  
Type System ◽  
Lambda Calculus ◽  
General Setting ◽  
Type Systems ◽  
Program Extraction ◽  
Pure Type ◽  
Typed Lambda Calculus ◽  
Reduction Strategies ◽  
Pure Type Systems ◽  
Reduction Relation

We introduce Pure Type Systems with Pairs generalising earlier work on program extraction in Typed Lambda Calculus. We model the process of program extraction in these systems by means of a reduction relation called o-reduction, and give strategies for Bo-reduction which will be useful for an implementation of a proof assistant. More precisely, we give an algorithm to compute theo-normal form of a term in Pure Type System with Pairs, and show that this defines a prejection from Pure Type Systems with Pairs to standart Pure Type Systems. This result shows that o-reduction is an operational description of aprgram extraction that is independent of the particular Typed Lambda Calculus specified as a Pure Typoe System. For B-reduction, we define weak and strong reduction strategies using Interaction Nets, generalising well-know efficient strategies for the l-calculus to the general setting of Pure Type Systems.

Type Theory and Formal Proof

2009 ◽  
Author(s):  
Rob Nederpelt ◽  
Herman Geuvers
Keyword(s):  
Type Theory ◽  
Formal Proof

Cubical Agda: A dependently typed programming language with univalence and higher inductive types

2021 ◽  
Vol 31 ◽  
Author(s):  
ANDREA VEZZOSI ◽  
ANDERS MÖRTBERG ◽  
ANDREAS ABEL
Keyword(s):  
Programming Language ◽  
Type Theory ◽  
Type Checking ◽  
Dependent Type Theory ◽  
Wide Range ◽  
General Schema ◽  
Direct Definition ◽  
Inductive Types ◽  
Definition Of ◽  
Cubical Type Theory

Abstract Proof assistants based on dependent type theory provide expressive languages for both programming and proving within the same system. However, all of the major implementations lack powerful extensionality principles for reasoning about equality, such as function and propositional extensionality. These principles are typically added axiomatically which disrupts the constructive properties of these systems. Cubical type theory provides a solution by giving computational meaning to Homotopy Type Theory and Univalent Foundations, in particular to the univalence axiom and higher inductive types (HITs). This paper describes an extension of the dependently typed functional programming language Agda with cubical primitives, making it into a full-blown proof assistant with native support for univalence and a general schema of HITs. These new primitives allow the direct definition of function and propositional extensionality as well as quotient types, all with computational content. Additionally, thanks also to copatterns, bisimilarity is equivalent to equality for coinductive types. The adoption of cubical type theory extends Agda with support for a wide range of extensionality principles, without sacrificing type checking and constructivity.

scholarly journals Automath and Pure Type Systems

2003 ◽  
Vol 85 (7) ◽  
pp. 30-49
Author(s):  
Fairouz Kamareddine ◽  
Twan Laan ◽  
Rob Nederpelt
Keyword(s):  
Type Systems ◽  
Pure Type ◽  
Pure Type Systems
Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document