scholarly journals Antiemetic Effectiveness and Cost-Saving of Aprepitant plus Granisetron Is Superior to Palonosetron in Gastrointestinal Cancer Patients Who Received Moderately Emetogenic Chemotherapy

2017 ◽  
Vol 8 (8) ◽  
pp. 1371-1377 ◽  
Author(s):  
Haruka Toda ◽  
Hitoshi Kawazoe ◽  
Akiko Yano ◽  
Yuji Yamamoto ◽  
Yuji Watanabe ◽  
...  
2012 ◽  
Vol 2012 ◽  
pp. 1-12 ◽  
Author(s):  
Thao T. Vo ◽  
Jeanenne J. Nelson

Studies on cardiovascular safety in cancer patients treated with highly or moderately emetogenic chemotherapy (HEC or MEC), who may have taken the antiemetic, aprepitant, have been limited to clinical trials and postmarketing spontaneous reports. Our study explored background rates of cardiovascular disease (CVD) events among HEC- or MEC-treated cancer patients in a population-based setting to contextualize events seen in a new drug development program and to determine at a high level whether rates differed by aprepitant usage. Medical and pharmacy claims data from the 2005–2007 IMPACT National Benchmark Database were classified into emetogenic chemotherapy categories and CVD outcomes. Among 5827 HEC/MEC-treated patients, frequencies were highest for hypertension (16–21%) and composites of venous (7–12%) and arterial thromboembolic events (4–7%). Aprepitant users generally did not experience higher frequencies of events compared to nonusers. Our study serves as a useful benchmark of background CVD event rates in a population-based setting of cancer patients.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document