scholarly journals Mentors’ and student nurses’ experiences of the clinical competence assessment tool

2020 ◽  
Vol 12 (4) ◽  
pp. 179
Author(s):  
M Sserumaga ◽  
A G Mubuuke ◽  
J Nakigudde ◽  
I G Munabi ◽  
R B Opoka ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Clinical Competence ◽  
Assessment Tool ◽  
Student Nurses ◽  
Competence Assessment

scholarly journals Development of clinical competence assessment tool for novice physical and occupational therapists—a mixed Delphi study

2016 ◽  
Vol 28 (3) ◽  
pp. 971-975 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yoshikiyo Kanada ◽  
Hiroaki Sakurai ◽  
Yoshito Sugiura ◽  
Yudai Hirano ◽  
Soichiro Koyama ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Clinical Competence ◽  
Delphi Study ◽  
Assessment Tool ◽  
Occupational Therapists ◽  
Competence Assessment

MacArthur Competence Assessment Tool–Criminal Adjudication

1998 ◽  
Author(s):  
Randy K. Otto ◽  
Norman G. Poythress ◽  
Robert A. Nicholson ◽  
John F. Edens ◽  
John Monahan ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Assessment Tool ◽  
Competence Assessment

Characteristics of Physicians Referred for a Competence Assessment: A Comparison of State Medical Board and Hospital Referred Physicians

2010 ◽  
Vol 96 (3) ◽  
pp. 8-15 ◽  
Author(s):  
Elizabeth S. Grace ◽  
Elizabeth J. Korinek ◽  
Zung V. Tran
Keyword(s):  
Clinical Competence ◽  
Competence Assessment ◽  
Average Performance ◽  
Medical Board ◽  
Key Characteristics ◽  
Different Types ◽  
Specialty Board ◽  
And Performance ◽  
State Medical Boards ◽  
State Medical Board

ABSTRACT This study compares key characteristics and performance of physicians referred to a clinical competence assessment and education program by state medical boards (boards) and hospitals. Physicians referred by boards (400) and by hospitals (102) completed a CPEP clinical competence assessment between July 2002 and June 2010. Key characteristics, self-reported specialty, and average performance rating for each group are reported and compared. Results show that, compared with hospital-referred physicians, board-referred physicians were more likely to be male (75.5% versus 88.3%), older (average age 54.1 versus 50.3 years), and less likely to be currently specialty board certified (80.4% versus 61.8%). On a scale of 1 (best) to 4 (worst), average performance was 2.62 for board referrals and 2.36 for hospital referrals. There were no significant differences between board and hospital referrals in the percentage of physicians who graduated from U.S. and Canadian medical schools. The most common specialties referred differed for boards and hospitals. Conclusion: Characteristics of physicians referred to a clinical competence program by boards and hospitals differ in important respects. The authors consider the potential reasons for these differences and whether boards and hospitals are dealing with different subsets of physicians with different types of performance problems. Further study is warranted.

Inter-rater Reliability of Preceptors on Clinical Pharmacy Competency Evaluation

2020 ◽  
Vol 15 ◽  
Author(s):  
Dixon Thomas ◽  
Sherief Khalifa ◽  
Jayadevan Sreedharan ◽  
Rucha Bond
Keyword(s):  
United Arab Emirates ◽  
Clinical Pharmacy ◽  
Clinical Competence ◽  
Assessment Tool ◽  
Clinical Skills ◽  
Group Discussion ◽  
Pharmacy Students ◽  
Rater Reliability ◽  
Quasi Experimental ◽  
Competency Evaluation

Background:: Clinical competence of pharmacy students is better evaluated at their practice sites. compared to the classroom. A clinical pharmacy competency evaluation rubric like that of the American College of Clinical Pharmacy (ACCP)is an effective assessment tool for clinical skills and can be used to show item reliability. The preceptors should be trained on how to use the rubrics as many inherent factors could influence inter-rater reliability. Objective:: To evaluate inter-rater reliability among preceptors on evaluating clinical competence of pharmacy students, before and after a group discussion intervention. Methods:: In this quasi experimental study in a United Arab Emirates teaching hospital, Seven clinical pharmacy preceptors rated clinical pharmacy competencies of ten recent PharmD graduates referring to their portfolios and preceptorship. Clinical pharmacy competencies were adopted from ACCP and mildly modified to be relevant for the local settings. Results:: Inter-rater reliability (Cronbach's Alpha) among preceptors was reasonable being practitioners at a single site for 2-4 years. At domain level, inter-rater reliability ranged from 0.79 - 0.93 before intervention and 0.94 - 0.99 after intervention. No inter-rater reliability was observed in relation to certain competency elements ranging from 0.31 – 0.61 before intervention, but improved to 0.79 – 0.97 after intervention. Intra-class correlation coefficient improved among all individual preceptors being reliable with each other after group discussion though some had no reliability with each other before group discussion. Conclusion:: Group discussion among preceptors at the training site was found to be effective in improving inter-rater reliability on all elements of the clinical pharmacy competency evaluation. Removing a preceptor from analysis did not affect inter-rater reliability after group discussion.

scholarly journals How Do We Assess Patient Skills in a Competence-Based Program? Assessment of Patient Competences Using the Spanish Version of the Prolapse and Incontinence Knowledge Questionnaire and Real Practical Cases in Women with Pelvic Floor Disorders

2021 ◽  
Vol 18 (5) ◽  
pp. 2377
Author(s):  
Beatriz Sánchez-Sánchez ◽  
Beatriz Arranz-Martín ◽  
Beatriz Navarro-Brazález ◽  
Fernando Vergara-Pérez ◽  
Javier Bailón-Cerezo ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Decision Making ◽  
Pelvic Floor ◽  
Discriminant Validity ◽  
Pelvic Floor Disorders ◽  
Assessment Tool ◽  
Pelvic Organ ◽  
Assessment Tools ◽  
Measurement Properties ◽  
Competence Assessment ◽  
Knowledge Questionnaire

Therapeutic patient education programs must assess the competences that patients achieve. Evaluation in the pedagogical domain ensures that learning has taken place among patients. The Prolapse and Incontinence Knowledge Questionnaire (PIKQ) is a tool for assessing patient knowledge about urinary (UI) and pelvic organ prolapse (POP) conditions. The aim of this study was to translate the Prolapse and Incontinence Knowledge Questionnaire (PIKQ) into Spanish and test its measurement properties, as well as propose real practical cases as a competence assessment tool. The cross-cultural adaptation was conducted by a standardized translation/back-translation method. Measurement properties analysis was performed by assessing the validity, reliability, responsiveness, and interpretability. A total of 275 women were recruited. The discriminant validity showed statistically significant differences in the PIKQ scores between patients and expert groups. Cronbach’s alpha revealed good internal consistency. The test–retest reliability showed excellent correlation with UI and POP scales. Regarding responsiveness, the effect size, and standardized response mean demonstrated excellent values. No floor or ceiling effects were shown. In addition, three “real practical cases” evaluating skills in identifying and analyzing, decision making, and problem-solving were developed and tested. The Spanish PIKQ is a comprehensible, valid, reliable, and responsive tool for the Spanish population. Real practical cases are useful competence assessment tools that are well accepted by women with pelvic floor disorders (PFD), improving their understanding and their decision-making regarding PFD.

scholarly journals Determining when impairment constitutes incapacity for informed consent in schizophrenia research

2007 ◽  
Vol 191 (1) ◽  
pp. 38-43 ◽  
Author(s):  
Scott Y. H. Kim ◽  
Paul S. Appelbaum ◽  
Jeffrey Swan ◽  
T. Scott Stroup ◽  
Joseph P. McEvoy ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Roc Analysis ◽  
Operating Characteristic ◽  
Assessment Tool ◽  
Ethics Committees ◽  
Competence Assessment ◽  
Evidence Based ◽  
Research Ethics Committees ◽  
Predictive Values ◽  
Risks And Benefits ◽  
Capacity Determination

BackgroundAlthough people with schizophrenia display impaired abilities for consent, it is not known how much impairment constitutes incapacity.AimsTo assess a method for determining the categorical capacity status of potential participants in schizophrenia research.MethodExpert-judgement validation of capacity thresholds on the sub-scales of the MacArthur Competence Assessment Tool – Clinical Research (MacCAT–CR) was evaluated using receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis in 91 people with severe mental illness and 40 controls.ResultsThe ROC areas under the curve for the understanding, appreciation and reasoning sub-scales of the MacCAT–CR were 0.94 (95% CI 0.88–0.99), 0.85 (95% CI 0.76–0.94) and 0.80 (95% CI 0.70–0.90). These findings yielded negative and positive predictive values of incapacity that can guide the practice of investigators and research ethics committees.ConclusionsBy performing such validation studies for a few categories of research with varying risks and benefits, it might be possible to create evidence-based capacity determination guidelines for most schizophrenia research.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document