scholarly journals Harms Of Loot Boxes And Approaching Regulation In Singapore

Loading ◽  
2022 ◽  
Vol 14 (24) ◽  
pp. 90-103
Author(s):  
Hee Jhee Jiow ◽  
Jun Ming Lim

‘Loot boxes’ are a type of videogame monetization model that contains randomized rewards of varying rarities which emerged in recent years. The element of chance seeks to entice players into buying loot boxes in hopes of receiving a rare and desirable reward. The design of loot boxes has been identified to be addictive and to entice players to spend more money than they estimate they would. With links to addiction and gambling behaviours, loot boxes may cause social harm if unregulated. Singapore is not new to the videogaming scene and may seek to regulate loot boxes should it emerge as a social problem amongst Singaporeans. By acknowledging existing approaches towards regulating loot boxes and situating loot boxes in Singapore’s social context, this paper explores Lessig’s four modalities of constraint as a framework to hypothesize regulatory options for Singapore.

EL-Ghiroh ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 18 (01) ◽  
pp. 1-6
Author(s):  
EKO NOPRIYANSA

Seems that the position of intellectual community gets its own attention to the public because by knowing it is expected to be able to convey an objective and neutral view in providing views on a social problem. Therefore intellectuals are characterized by their ability to respond critically to social problems through discussion or writing in the public sphere. In a wider social context, important roles as well as having the main potential in correcting social problems include religious leaders, pioneers, and intellectuals, where they have a great responsibility for a harmonious society both in religion and more in the state.


2020 ◽  
Vol 48 (S4) ◽  
pp. 179-182
Author(s):  
Catherine Feuille

This commentary responds to and problematizes Kimmel and Rowe's approach in “A Behavioral Addiction Model of Revenge, Violence, and Gun Abuse.” By advancing an addiction model of retaliatory violence, Kimmel and Rowe medicalize behavior that is better understood as a social problem rooted in structural inequality. Reframing violence in terms of individual pathology abstracts it from social context and risks obscuring the need for structural change. For poor urban communities of color, who are disproportionately impacted by gun violence, medicalizing violent behavior may fuel further marginalization and oppression.


2018 ◽  
Vol 27 (4) ◽  
pp. 341-358 ◽  
Author(s):  
John D. Eigenauer

Despite the widespread social harm that human irrationality causes, irrationality is not considered to be a social problem. This article explores why this is so, argues why irrationality is unlikely to be considered a social problem, and suggests that the best hope for reducing the social harms caused by human irrationality lies with the educational system.


1985 ◽  
Vol 48 (4) ◽  
pp. 1015-1023 ◽  
Author(s):  
Robert Gifford ◽  
Timothy M. Gallagher

1976 ◽  
Vol 21 (3) ◽  
pp. 198-199 ◽  
Author(s):  
CHARLES W. TURNER
Keyword(s):  

1985 ◽  
Vol 30 (11) ◽  
pp. 853-858 ◽  
Author(s):  
Barbara Ross
Keyword(s):  

1987 ◽  
Vol 32 (12) ◽  
pp. 1004-1007
Author(s):  
Gregory M. Herek
Keyword(s):  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document