scholarly journals Mucosal Defense Mechanism of the Nose

2020 ◽  
Vol 59 (1) ◽  
pp. 60-60
Author(s):  
Joo-Heon Yoon
1989 ◽  
Vol 24 (sup162) ◽  
pp. 170-173 ◽  
Author(s):  
H. Tanaka ◽  
N. Kosaka ◽  
A. Tomaru ◽  
K. Shuto ◽  
T. Ogihara ◽  
...  

1988 ◽  
Vol 10 ◽  
pp. S99-113S ◽  
Author(s):  
Masaya Oda ◽  
Masahiko Nakamura ◽  
Koya Honda ◽  
Hirokazu Komatsu ◽  
Kotaro Kaneko ◽  
...  

1993 ◽  
Vol 102 (5) ◽  
pp. 385-395 ◽  
Author(s):  
Keehyun Park ◽  
David J. Lim

Secretory activity, particularly of antibacterial agents such as lysozyme and lactoferrin, is an important aspect of the mucosal defense mechanism, and the development of these agents may have a direct bearing on the susceptibility of the ear to infection. In this study, the secretory cells of the murine tubal epithelium were first observed at gestational day 17. Although tubal glands began to develop on gestational day 18, their secretory activity was first shown on postnatal day 3. The number of secretory cells of the tubal epithelium increased rapidly immediately after birth, while that of the tubal glands showed a gradual increase from postnatal day 3. The epithelial secretory cells in the tubotympanum matured at birth, but the tubal glands matured gradually after birth. Lysozyme was first recognized in the epithelial secretory cells on postnatal day 1, while lactoferrin was first detected in the tubal glands on postnatal day 3. Both lysozyme and lactoferrin were co-localized in the serous cells of the tubal glands. The secretion of lysozyme and lactoferrin seemed to reflect the maturation of the secretory cells in the murine tubotympanum.


2014 ◽  
Vol 2014 ◽  
pp. 1-10 ◽  
Author(s):  
Koji Takeuchi ◽  
Kenji Nagahama

Esophagitis was induced in rats within 3 h by ligating both the pylorus and transitional region between the forestomach and glandular portion under ether anesthesia. This esophageal injury was prevented by the administration of acid suppressants and antipepsin drug and aggravated by exogenous pepsin. Damage was also aggravated by pretreatment with indomethacin and the selective COX-1 but not COX-2 inhibitor, whereas PGE2showed a biphasic effect depending on the dose; a protection at low doses, and an aggravation at high doses, with both being mediated by EP1 receptors. Various amino acids also affected this esophagitis in different ways; L-alanine and L-glutamine had a deleterious effect, while L-arginine and glycine were highly protective, both due to yet unidentified mechanisms. It is assumed that acid/pepsin plays a major pathogenic role in this model of esophagitis; PGs derived from COX-1 are involved in mucosal defense of the esophagus; and some amino acids are protective against esophagitis. These findings also suggest a novel therapeutic approach in the treatment of esophagitis, in addition to acid suppressant therapy. The model introduced may be useful to test the protective effects of drugs on esophagitis and investigate the mucosal defense mechanism in the esophagus.


Author(s):  
Olya Khaleelee

This paper describes the use of the Defense Mechanism Test as an aid in helping to assess senior executives in four areas: for selection, development, career strategy, and crisis intervention. The origins of this test, developed to measure the defense mechanisms used to protect the individual from stress, are described. The paper shows how it was used to predict the capacity of trainee fighter pilots to withstand stress and its later application to other stressful occupations. Finally, some ideal types of the test are shown followed by four real test profiles, two of them with their associated histories.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document