scholarly journals Prognostic Role of PTEN Gene Expression and Length of Survival of Breast Cancer Patients in the North East of Iran

2016 ◽  
Vol 17 (sup3) ◽  
pp. 305-309 ◽  
Author(s):  
Rahim Golmohammadi ◽  
Mohammad Hassan Rakhshani ◽  
Ali Reza Moslem ◽  
Akbar Pejhan
2020 ◽  
Vol 23 (2) ◽  
pp. 182 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yaewon Yang ◽  
Ahrum Min ◽  
Kyung-Hun Lee ◽  
Han Suk Ryu ◽  
Tae-Yong Kim ◽  
...  

2019 ◽  
Vol 51 (1) ◽  
pp. 128-140 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ling Deng ◽  
Xuehua Zhu ◽  
Yun Sun ◽  
Jiemin Wang ◽  
Xiaorong Zhong ◽  
...  

2017 ◽  
Vol 35 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 536-536
Author(s):  
Christian F. Singer ◽  
Stephan W Jahn ◽  
Margaretha Rudas ◽  
Zsuzsanna Bago-Horvath ◽  
Florian Fitzal ◽  
...  

536 Background: We have recently demonstrated that urokinase Plasminogen Activator (uPA), together with its inhibitor PAI-1, have prognostic value in hormone-receptor positive early breast cancer, and can be measured in FFPE archived tumor samples. We have now aimed to validate the prognostic role of uPA protein expression in FFPE archived tumor samples in an independent cohort of endocrine-treated breast cancer patients. Methods: 303 postmenopausal women with hormone receptor–positive, early breast cancer who had received 5 years of endocrine therapy in the prospectively designed ABCSG-08 trial, and in whom FFPE tumor tissue was available, were included in this analysis. Stromal uPA and PAI-1 protein expression was evaluated by immunohistochemistry and correlated with distant recurrence-free survival (DRFS) and overall survival (OS). Results: Stromal uPA was detected in 132 of 297 tumors (44.4%), and 74 out of 269 samples (27.5%) exhibited stromal PAI-1, while co-expression of both proteins was found in 48 of 294 (16.3%) samples. Neither uPA nor PAI-1 expression were associated with tumor size, age, nodal status, grading, or receptor status. Patients whose tumor stroma expressed uPA protein were more likely to have a shorter DRFS (adjusted HR for relapse: 2.78; 95% CI 1.31-5.93; p=0.008 Cox regression analysis) and OS (adjusted HR for death: 1.29; 95% CI 0.86-12.50; p=0.161) than women without uPA expression. No such association was observed for PAI-1 and for the uPA/PAI1 ratio. After a median follow-up of 5.6 years women with uPA-positive tumors experienced a significantly shorter DRFS (93.3% vs 84.8%; p<0.013 log rank test) and tended to have a worse OS (83.0.4% vs 77.3%; p=0.106) compared to women with uPA negative tumors. Conclusions: By confirming the clinical utility of stromal uPA IHC in archived breast cancer samples from an independent prospective randomized trial, we now provide level 1b evidence for a prognostic role of stromal uPA in women with endocrine-responsive early breast cancer.


2019 ◽  
Vol 105 (1) ◽  
pp. E32-E33
Author(s):  
I.R. Scognamiglio ◽  
M. Conson ◽  
M. Caroprese ◽  
A. Romano ◽  
A. Farella ◽  
...  

Medicine ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 98 (1) ◽  
pp. e13842 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ling Bo Xue ◽  
Yong Hong Liu ◽  
Bo Zhang ◽  
Yan Fang Yang ◽  
Dong Yang ◽  
...  

2012 ◽  
Vol 5 ◽  
pp. CGM.S8821 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mohammad A. Tabatabai ◽  
Wayne M. Eby ◽  
Nadim Nimeh ◽  
Karan P. Singh

This paper analyzes the survival of breast cancer patients, exploring the role of a metastasis variable in combination with clinical and gene expression variables. We use the hypertabastic model in a detailed analysis of 295 breast cancer patients from the Netherlands Cancer Institute given in. 1 In comparison to Cox regression the increase in accuracy is complemented by the ability to analyze the time course of the disease progression using the explicitly described hazard and survival curves. We also demonstrate the ability to compute deciles for survival and probability of survival to a given time. Our primary concern in this article is the introduction of a variable representing the existence of metastasis and the effects on the other clinical and gene expression variables. In addition to making a quantitative assessment of the impact of metastasis on the prospects for survival, we are able to look at its interactions with the other prognostic variables. The estrogen receptor status increase in importance, while the significance of the gene expression variables used in the combined model diminishes. When considering only the subgroup of patients who experienced metastasis, the covariates in the model are only the clinical variables for estrogen receptor status and tumor grade.


2011 ◽  
Vol 16 (5) ◽  
pp. 173-177 ◽  
Author(s):  
Iwona Gisterek ◽  
Ewelina Lata ◽  
Agnieszka Halon ◽  
Rafal Matkowski ◽  
Jolanta Szelachowska ◽  
...  

The Breast ◽  
2011 ◽  
Vol 20 ◽  
pp. S40
Author(s):  
I.J. Gisterek ◽  
A. Halon ◽  
U. Staszek-Szewczyk ◽  
R. Matkowski ◽  
J. Szelachowska ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document