Staying Alive

Author(s):  
Stephen C. Nelson

This chapter examines how the design and enforcement of the International Monetary Fund's (IMF) lending arrangements affect the political survival of economic policymakers in borrowing governments. It first considers anecdotal evidence on the IMF's impact on the appointment and retention of economic officials in the borrowing country before discussing the variation in the types of officials that occupied the top policymaking posts in developing countries. The evidence suggests that the power of the IMF extends beyond influencing how the borrowing economies are governed. It argues that the IMF, through its conditional lending programs, also influences who governs the economy. It also discusses the association between participation in IMF lending arrangements and the presence of neoliberal policymakers in the borrowing government.

Author(s):  
Stephen C. Nelson

This chapter examines how the economic beliefs held by the International Monetary Fund's (IMF) decision makers and the beliefs of the officials at the helm of the borrowing governments shape loan size, conditionality, and enforcement decisions. It first considers two theoretically and empirically informed observations about the IMF-borrower relationship. First, key decisions in the conditional lending process are necessarily informed by the subjective judgments of the staff and management. Second, those judgments are often made in the presence of uncertainty. The chapter then introduces a set of mechanisms that link shared economic beliefs to the measurable outputs of the decisions about each element of the conditional lending process (access, conditionality, and enforcement). It also discusses the rise of neoliberal policymakers in developing countries and why such policymakers get less demanding (and more generous) programs from the IMF.


2017 ◽  
Vol 32 (1) ◽  
pp. 127-147
Author(s):  
Im Tobin

While many studies have focused on the link between economics and democracy in exploring the strategies adopted by developing countries, they have tended to overlook the role of bureaucracy in democratization. This study seeks the missing link between bureaucracy and democratization. What are the conditions necessary for bureaucracy to facilitate the democratization process of a country? This article begins by briefly reviewing the bureaucracy literature from Max Weber and Karl Marx and then argues that despite its shortcomings, bureaucracy in its Weberian form can facilitate the political democratization of a developmental state. This study concludes that although bureaucracy is often regarded as dysfunctional, it can be instrumental in the democratization process in the context of the developmental state.


2004 ◽  
pp. 288-315
Author(s):  
Graham Bird ◽  
Paul Mosley
Keyword(s):  

Author(s):  
Adrian Sinfield

Increasing inequality was a deliberate policy of the Thatcher governments, marking a significant shift in UK policy-making. The strategy was supported by strong vested interests and active myth-making that stigmatized both social spending and its recipients. The legacy of Thatcherism has been powerful and persistent, leading to an acceptance of the increased inequality and a lack of challenge to its proponents and beneficiaries. There now appears to be a growing challenge to this acquiescence from many quarters including the churches and, surprisingly, the IMF, as well as many more detailed analyses of the wide differences in income and wealth. The arguments against increased inequality have strengthened again, bolstered by growing evidence of exploitation of the tax system, but is the political will strong enough to bring about significant changes?


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document