C1-C2 Dorsal Epidural Hematoma on Cervical Spine CT: A Novel Imaging Sign of Posterior Atlanto-Occipital Membrane Stripping Injury

Acute Traumatic Cervical Facet Fractures

Neurologico Spinale Medico Chirurgico ◽

10.15562/nsmc.v1i2.83 ◽

2018 ◽

Vol 1 (2) ◽

pp. 5

Author(s):

Shankar Gopinat

Keyword(s):

Spinal Cord ◽

Cervical Spine ◽

Early Surgery ◽

Initial Assessment ◽

Trauma Patients ◽

Spinal Stability ◽

Fracture Patterns ◽

Spine Ct ◽

Cervical Facet

Acute cervical facet fractures are increasingly being detected due to the use of cervical spine CT imaging in the initial assessment of trauma patients. For displaced cervical facet fractures with dislocations and subluxations, early surgery can decompress the spinal cord and stabilize the spine. For patients with non-displaced cervical facet fractures, the challenge in managing these patients is the determination of spinal stability. Although many of the patients with non-displaced cervical facet fractures can be managed with a cervical collar, the imaging needs to be analyzed carefully since certain fracture patterns may be better managed with early surgical stabilization.

Download Full-text

Can emergency physicians accurately rule out clinically important cervical spine injuries by using computed tomography?

CJEM ◽

10.2310/8000.2013.130978 ◽

2014 ◽

Vol 16 (02) ◽

pp. 131-135 ◽

Cited By ~ 3

Author(s):

Hendrik P. Van Zyl ◽

James Bilbey ◽

Alan Vukusic ◽

Todd Ring ◽

Jennifer Oakes ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Cervical Spine ◽

Cervical Spine Injury ◽

Clinical Skills ◽

Ct Scans ◽

Spine Injury ◽

Emergency Physicians ◽

Cervical Spine Injuries ◽

Spine Ct ◽

Spine Injuries ◽

Rule Out

ABSTRACT Objective: Emergency physicians are expected to rule out clinically important cervical spine injuries using clinical skills and imaging. Our objective was to determine whether emergency physicians could accurately rule out clinically important cervical spine injuries using computed tomographic (CT) imaging of the cervical spine. Method: Fifteen emergency physicians were enrolled to interpret a sample of 50 cervical spine CT scans in a nonclinical setting. The sample contained a 30% incidence of cervical spine injury. After a 2-hour review session, the participants interpreted the CT scans and categorized them into either a suspected cervical spine injury or no cervical spine injury. Participants were asked to specify the location and type of injury. The gold standard interpretation was the combined opinion of two staff radiologists. Results: Emergency physicians correctly identified 182 of the 210 abnormal cases with cervical spine injury. The sensitivity of emergency physicians was 87% (95% confidence interval [CI] 82–91), and the specificity was 76% (95% CI 74–77). The negative likelihood ratio was 0.18 (95% CI 0.12–0.25). Conclusion: Experienced emergency physicians successfully identified a large proportion of cervical spine injuries on CT; however, they were not sufficiently sensitive to accurately exclude clinically important injuries. Emergency physicians should rely on a radiologist review of cervical spine CT scans prior to discontinuing cervical spine precautions.

Download Full-text