scholarly journals Losing Legs to Losing Everything: How Neglecting Holistic Health Devastated a Lower-limb Amputee

Cureus ◽  
2019 ◽  
Author(s):  
Takumi Kawashita ◽  
Teevit Dunnsiri ◽  
Sara Shu ◽  
Patrick Tran ◽  
Davin Agustines
Author(s):  
Per A.F.H. Renstrom ◽  
Hannu Alaranta ◽  
Timo Pohjolainen

2007 ◽  
Vol 31 (3) ◽  
pp. 300-312 ◽  
Author(s):  
Oren Cheifetz ◽  
Mark Bayley ◽  
Sharon Grad ◽  
Debbie Lambert ◽  
Cass Watson ◽  
...  

This study assesses the reliability and predictive validity of the Lower Limb Extremity Amputee Measurement Scale (LLAMS), which is an assessment tool designed to predict the length of stay (LOS) of patients with lower limb amputations in a rehabilitation program. In order to evaluate inter-rater reliability a prospective evaluation was completed by five independent evaluators ( n = 10). Predictive validity was evaluated retrospectively by comparing the LLAMS predicted LOS to actual LOS ( n = 147). The ability of the amputee team members to administer the LLAMS to patients was very high (ICC [2,1] = 0.98, CI 95% = 0.96 – 0.99, F[9, 36] = 78.71, p < 0.05). In addition, a moderate positive correlation was found between the LLAMS predicted LOS and the actual LOS (Pearson Correlation Coefficient, r = 0.465, p < 0.01), and the LLAMS was able to identify those patients who required short versus long rehabilitation stays. The incorporation of the LLAMS into the physiatrist's initial assessment of patients in the amputee clinic has enhanced the ability to manage better the LOS and the time patients wait to enter the rehabilitation program.


2018 ◽  
Vol 43 (1) ◽  
pp. 80-87 ◽  
Author(s):  
Robert Gailey ◽  
Anat Kristal ◽  
Jennifer Lucarevic ◽  
Shane Harris ◽  
Brooks Applegate ◽  
...  

Background: Prosthetic socket fit is an important element associated with successful ambulation and use of a prosthesis. Prosthetists and rehabilitation clinicians would benefit from an assessment tool that discriminates between and quantifies the multiple determinants that influence the lower limb amputee’s performance and satisfaction of a prosthetic socket. Objectives: To determine the internal consistency of the comprehensive lower limb amputee socket survey, a new self-report measure of prosthetic socket satisfaction that quantifies suspension, stability, comfort, and appearance. Study design: Cross-sectional sample of active amputees. Methods: Interviews were conducted with prosthetists, physical therapists, and lower limb amputees to identify clinical concerns and common activities influencing socket fit. An expert panel of five clinicians reviewed the items and constructed the original version of the comprehensive lower limb amputee socket survey which was then administered to a convenience sample of 47 active lower limb amputees. Item analysis and Cronbach’s alpha were used to determine the final version of the comprehensive lower limb amputee socket survey. Results: Following item raw score-to-total score correlation with Cronbach’s alpha for comprehensive lower limb amputee socket survey determinants, internal consistency improved when nine questions were eliminated. Conclusion: The comprehensive lower limb amputee socket survey is a self-report measure of prosthetic socket satisfaction with very good internal consistency. Clinical relevance When socket problems occur, the ability to determine the specific cause can reduce modification time, enhance socket fit, and promote patient satisfaction. A standardized multi-dimensional assessment measure of socket satisfaction enables prosthetists to quantify the multiple determinants of socket satisfaction, improve patient communication, and demonstrate the value of socket interventions.


1986 ◽  
Vol 2 (2) ◽  
pp. 94-100 ◽  
Author(s):  
Rosalind Ham ◽  
Catherine Van de Ven

PM&R ◽  
2010 ◽  
Vol 2 (10) ◽  
pp. 926-934 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jaime C. Yu ◽  
Kenneth Lam ◽  
Alberto Nettel-Aguirre ◽  
Maoliosa Donald ◽  
Sean Dukelow

2014 ◽  
Vol 31 (1) ◽  
pp. 173-185 ◽  
Author(s):  
Gautham Chitragari ◽  
David B. Mahler ◽  
Brandon J. Sumpio ◽  
Peter A. Blume ◽  
Bauer E. Sumpio

2004 ◽  
Vol 16 (4) ◽  
pp. 123-129 ◽  
Author(s):  
Nalika S. Gunawardena ◽  
Rohini de Alwis Seneviratne ◽  
Thamara Athauda

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document