scholarly journals The Use of Sublaminar Wiring in the Sub-Axial Cervical Spine as an Adjuvant to Lateral Mass and Pedicle Screw Fixation in a Patient with Metastatic Carcinoma of the Upper Thoracic Spine

Cureus ◽  
2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Calvin C Whaley ◽  
Michael Young ◽  
Jason M Seibly
2010 ◽  
Vol 66 (suppl_1) ◽  
pp. ons-178-ons-182
Author(s):  
Andrew S. Little ◽  
Leonardo B.C. Brasiliense ◽  
Bruno C.R. Lazaro ◽  
Phillip M. Reyes ◽  
Curtis A. Dickman ◽  
...  

Abstract Objective: To compare the biomechanics of costotransverse process screw fixation with those of pedicle screw fixation in a cadaveric model of the upper thoracic spine. Methods: Ten human thoracic spines were instrumented across the T3–T4 segment with costotransverse and pedicle screws. Nonconstraining pure moments (maximum, 6.0 Nm) were applied to induce flexion, extension, lateral bending, and axial rotation. The range of motion, lax zone, and stiff zone were determined in each specimen in the normal state, after 3-column destabilization, and after instrumentation. After flexibility testing was completed, axial screw pull-out strength was assessed. Results: In all directions of loading, both fixation techniques significantly decreased lax zone and range of motion at T3–T4 compared with the destabilized state (P < .001). During all loading modes except lateral bending, pedicle screw fixation allowed significantly less range of motion than costotransverse screw fixation. Pedicle screws provided 62% greater resistance to axial pull-out than costotransverse screws. Conclusion: The costotransverse screw technique seems to provide only moderately stiff fixation of the destabilized thoracic spine. Pedicle screw fixation seems to have more favorable biomechanical properties. These data suggest that the costotransverse process construct is better used as a salvage procedure rather than as a primary fixation strategy.


2021 ◽  
Vol 9 ◽  
pp. 2050313X2098779
Author(s):  
Shota Miyoshi ◽  
Tadao Morino ◽  
Haruhiko Takeda ◽  
Hiroshi Nakata ◽  
Masayuki Hino ◽  
...  

A 74-year-old man developed bilateral lower limb spastic paresis. He was diagnosed with thoracic spondylotic myelopathy presumably caused by mechanical stress that was generated in the intervertebral space (T1-T2) between a vertebral bone bridge (C5-T1) due to diffuse idiopathic skeletal hyperostosis after anterior fixation of the lower cervical spine and a vertebral bone bridge (T2-T7) due to diffuse idiopathic skeletal hyperostosis in the upper thoracic spine. Treatment included posterior decompression (T1-T2 laminectomy) and percutaneous pedicle screw fixation at the C7-T4 level. Six months after surgery, the patient could walk with a cane, and the vertebral bodies T1-T2 were bridged without bone grafting. For thoracic spondylotic myelopathy associated with diffuse idiopathic skeletal hyperostosis, decompression and percutaneous pedicle screw fixation are effective therapies.


2014 ◽  
Vol 05 (04) ◽  
pp. 349-354 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mark A. Rivkin ◽  
Jessica F. Okun ◽  
Steven S. Yocom

ABSTRACT Summary of Background Data: Multilevel posterior cervical instrumented fusions are becoming more prevalent in current practice. Biomechanical characteristics of the cervicothoracic junction may necessitate extending the construct to upper thoracic segments. However, fixation in upper thoracic spine can be technically demanding owing to transitional anatomy while suboptimal placement facilitates vascular and neurologic complications. Thoracic instrumentation methods include free-hand, fluoroscopic guidance, and CT-based image guidance. However, fluoroscopy of upper thoracic spine is challenging secondary to vertebral geometry and patient positioning, while image-guided systems present substantial financial commitment and are not readily available at most centers. Additionally, imaging modalities increase radiation exposure to the patient and surgeon while potentially lengthening surgical time. Materials and Methods: Retrospective review of 44 consecutive patients undergoing a cervicothoracic fusion by a single surgeon using the novel free-hand T1 pedicle screw technique between June 2009 and November 2012. A starting point medial and cephalad to classic entry as well as new trajectory were utilized. No imaging modalities were employed during screw insertion. Postoperative CT scans were obtained on day 1. Screw accuracy was independently evaluated according to the Heary classification. Results: In total, 87 pedicle screws placed were at T1. Grade 1 placement occurred in 72 (82.8%) screws, Grade 2 in 4 (4.6%) screws and Grade 3 in 9 (10.3%) screws. All Grade 2 and 3 breaches were <2 mm except one Grade 3 screw breaching 2-4 mm laterally. Only two screws (2.3%) were noted to be Grade 4, both breaching medially by less than 2 mm. No new neurological deficits or returns to operating room took place postoperatively. Conclusions: This modification of the traditional starting point and trajectory at T1 is safe and effective. It attenuates additional bone removal or imaging modalities while maintaining a high rate of successful screw placement compared to historical controls.


Spine ◽  
2005 ◽  
Vol 30 (22) ◽  
pp. 2530-2537 ◽  
Author(s):  
Vedat Deviren ◽  
Emre Acaroglu ◽  
Joe Lee ◽  
Masaru Fujita ◽  
Serena Hu ◽  
...  

Cureus ◽  
2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ismail Kaya ◽  
İlker Deniz Cingöz ◽  
Meryem Cansu Şahin ◽  
Murat Atar ◽  
Safak Ozyoruk ◽  
...  

2019 ◽  
Vol 13 (3) ◽  
pp. 39-44 ◽  
Author(s):  
Tamburrelli FC ◽  
Perna A ◽  
Proietti L ◽  
Zirio G ◽  
Santagada DA ◽  
...  

2018 ◽  
Vol 8 (7) ◽  
pp. 751-760 ◽  
Author(s):  
Andrei Fernandes Joaquim ◽  
Marcelo Luis Mudo ◽  
Lee A. Tan ◽  
K. Daniel Riew

Study Design: A narrative literature review. Objectives: To review the surgical techniques of posterior screw fixation in the subaxial cervical spine. Methods: A broad literature review on the most common screw fixation techniques including lateral mass, pedicle, intralaminar and transfacet screws was performed on PubMed. The techniques and surgical nuances are summarized. Results: The following techniques were described in detail and presented with illustrative figures, including (1) lateral mass screw insertion: by Roy-Camille, Louis, Magerl, Anderson, An, Riew techniques and also a modified technique for C7 lateral mass fixation; (2) pedicle screw fixation technique as described by Abumi and also a freehand technique description; (3) intralaminar screw fixation; and finally, (4) transfacet screw fixation, as described by Takayasu, DalCanto, Klekamp, and Miyanji. Conclusions: Many different techniques of subaxial screw fixation were described and are available. To know the nuances of each one allows surgeons to choose the best option for each patient, improving the success of the fixation and decrease complications.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document