scholarly journals Mental health services: perception of nursing in relation to overload and working conditions / Serviços de saúde mental: percepção da enfermagem em relação à sobrecarga e condições de trabalho

Author(s):  
Sidnei Roberto Alves ◽  
Reginaldo Passoni Dos Santos ◽  
Raquel Gusmão Oliveira ◽  
Mirian Ueda Yamaguchi

Objetivo: conhecer a percepção dos profissionais de enfermagem em relação à sobrecarga e condições de trabalho em serviços psiquiátricos hospitalares. Método: Estudo descritivo, analítico e exploratório, desenvolvido a partir do referencial de Bardin. A coleta de dados ocorreu no período de abril a maio de 2013 com 70 profissionais de enfermagem, aplicando-se a Escala de Avaliação do Impacto do Trabalho em Serviços de Saúde Mental. Obteve-se o Certificado de Apresentação para Apreciação Ética sob nº 13676913.2.0000.5539. Resultados: Da análise de conteúdo emergiram três categorias: As causas da sobrecarga de trabalho; Aspectos que aliviam a sobrecarga; Mudanças propostas para diminuir a sobrecarga. Considerações finais: Falta de recursos humanos e relações interpessoais conflituosas incrementam a sobrecarga, ao passo que a infraestrutura física do ambiente influencia negativamente nas condições de trabalho.Descritores: Enfermagem, Saúde mental, Recursos humanos.

BJPsych Open ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 7 (S1) ◽  
pp. S329-S329
Author(s):  
Saima Jehanzeb ◽  
Muhammad Suleman ◽  
Ella Tumelty ◽  
Joanne Okusanya ◽  
Laxsan Karunanithy ◽  
...  

AimsAs the COVID-19 pandemic continues, increasing attention is being drawn to the welfare of healthcare providers who have endured many months of sustained exposure to the virus, disrupted working conditions and psychological stress. This project aimed to explore the subjective experiences of staff working in Liaison Psychiatry (LP) in the Birmingham and Solihull Mental Health Foundation Trust, (BSMHFT) during the first wave of the COVID-19 pandemic. These findings have been used to devise recommendations for subsequent waves.MethodData collection occurred as part of a mixed method service evaluation project. We invited all clinical and non-clinical staff from LP departments across BSMHFT to participate in focus groups conducted via Microsoft Teams. The focus groups were video-recorded and facilitated by a moderator and an observer. Subsequent anonymised transcripts were coded and themes were generated by at least two evaluators, using thematic analysis.ResultThe focus groups, which ranged from 21 to 69 minutes, involved consultants, junior doctors and nurses from four hospitals within BSMHFT. Six major themes emerged including an initial reduction in number yet increase in acuity of patients seen by LP, with some perception that this resulted from reduced face-to-face contact with community mental health services. A feeling that LP was lost at the interface between the physical and mental health trusts emerged as another theme. Uncertainty in adapting to unprecedented working conditions, for example, unclear guidance concerning the use of personal protective equipment, was also described alongside anxiety about contracting and transmitting SARS-Cov-2. Additionally, increased pressure was felt due to staff shortages and inadequate inter-departmental communication. Participants reported differential uptake of remote working, as well as conflicting views regarding the feasibility of remote assessments in LP.ConclusionLiaison psychiatry staff within BSMHFT continued to provide a crucial service during the COVID-19 pandemic. Focus groups with thes staff indicate several recommendations for implementation within the Trust and provoke questions for future research. Due to the unique role that LP plays in providing mental health care within general hospitals, clear guidance for LP staff is key for effective service provision and supporting LP staff. Although used widely across community mental health services, the role of remote working in LP is contentious and requires further exploration. However, there are limitations to the use of focus groups and these findings may not fully represent the experiences of LP staff throughout BSMHFT. Different themes may have emerged through the use of anonymous questionnaires.


Crisis ◽  
1998 ◽  
Vol 19 (1) ◽  
pp. 4-5
Author(s):  
Mary Frances Seeley

1989 ◽  
Vol 44 (8) ◽  
pp. 1133-1137 ◽  
Author(s):  
Leonard Bickman ◽  
Paul R. Dokecki

1984 ◽  
Vol 39 (10) ◽  
pp. 1195-1197 ◽  
Author(s):  
Randall P. Ellis ◽  
Thomas G. McGuire

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document