Abstract
Background: Blood loss as a percentage of total blood volume for redefining PPH may be more appropriate compared to the 500ml cutoff for every pregnant woman. This study is to investigate the value of body surface area in redefining PPH.Methods: In our prospective clinical observational study, we calculated the total blood volume using body surface area and measured blood loss at delivery using gravimetric and volumetric methods for all pregnant women included in our cohort (n=1715). For the five different body surface area groups, we determined different percentages of blood loss in total blood volume among 1201 participants. Furthermore, we compared the prediction values in blood transfusion based on the quantification of bleeding or proportion of blood loss in total blood volume at different quintiles among 514 severe PPH cases. Results: The median total blood volume and body surface area were 4639ml and 1.73 m2, respectively. The median total blood volume increased with increasing body surface area, and the different proportions of total blood volume increased accordingly. The median blood loss was 380ml and represented 8.28% of total blood volume. The median measured 24h blood loss across quintile 1 to 5 was 363ml, 360ml, 390ml, 380ml, 440ml, respectively. Using the definition with blood loss of 500 ml and 13% percentage of total blood volume, the incidence of PPH was 30% and 19%. However, the changes of the circulatory system secondary to obstetric hemorrhage was not significantly different at each quintile. Additionally, use of blood loss or the percentage of blood loss in total blood volume has high specificity and sensitivity as the indicators to predict blood transfusion.Conclusions: Our results suggest that blood loss exceeds 13% of total blood volume as a definition of postpartum hemorrhage. Blood loss above 30% of total blood volume may be recommended for blood transfusion.