forest birds
Recently Published Documents


TOTAL DOCUMENTS

483
(FIVE YEARS 62)

H-INDEX

52
(FIVE YEARS 4)

Biotropica ◽  
2022 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kelsey Condell ◽  
W. Douglas Robinson ◽  
Randall P. Moore ◽  
Bryan Rourke

Author(s):  
Keith Burnett ◽  
Richard J. Camp ◽  
Patrick J. Hart

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
◽  
Graeme Peter Elliott

<p>This study aimed to find an explanation for the decline of yellowheads and formulate recommendations for management and further research on the species. There were three main lines of investigation: basic population ecology and behaviour; the effect of introduced predators on breeding; and the habitat relationships of the species. A detailed study of a yellowhead population in the Eglinton Valley in Fiordland National Park was undertaken. Birds were caught and banded and their behaviour, breeding and survival monitored for 4 years. The relationship between yellowhead distribution and vegetation, topography, and fertility were investigated in part of Mt Aspiring National Park during one summer.  Yellowheads suffered high rates of predation from stoats during "plagues" that occurred after heavy beech seeding. Three aspects of yellowhead biology made them vulnerable to mammalian predation: (1) they nested in holes and predators killed not only eggs and nestlings, but also incubating adults; (2) only the females incubated, thus losses to predators had a greater effect on the population than if equal numbers of males and females were killed; and (3) yellowheads nested later than most other forest passerines and were still nesting when stoat numbers reached their summer peak. Though the yellowhead's hole nesting habit made them vulnerable to mammals it restricted nest parasitism and predation by long-tailed cuckoos and hole nesting is likely to have evolved in response to cuckoos. Yellowheads were found to be tall forest specialists; they occurred more frequently in tall forests than short ones, and preferentially used the largest trees. Their choice of nest sites had no effect on their preference for any forest types. The forests they favoured grew mainly on fertile valley floors at low altitudes. Yellowhead populations in "good habitats" raised two broods a year and these populations are probably sufficiently productive to withstand stoat plagues occurring once every 5 years, the average frequency of this event. Populations in "poor habitats" raise only one brood and their productivity is probably insufficient to match losses to stoats. Such populations are probably slowly declining, and are very vulnerable to extinction. A habitat suitability index was devised and forests in the north of the South Island from which yellowheads have disappeared, were compared with those in the south where yellowheads persist. Northern forests were as good for yellowheads as southern ones. Thus, the combination of habitat preference and predation cannot account for the recent disappearance of yellowheads from the northern half of the South Island. The decline in yellowheads was attributed to both predation by introduced mammals and competition with introduced vespulid wasps. Predation may have eliminated yellowheads from podocarp-dominated forests where predator numbers are constantly high, but they survive in some beech forests where predator numbers rise only once every five years. However, even within beech forests only the most productive populations are sufficiently productive to survive predation and these populations are probably susceptible to competition with wasps which eat large numbers of invertebrates. Yellowheads are likely to be more vulnerable to wasp competition than other forest insectivores because: (1) predation has reduced their productivity more than other birds because they nest in holes; (2) they are specialised in low altitude, tall forest that the wasps also favour; (3) their breeding is later than most other forest birds and their period of juvenile dependence much longer. Yellowheads are still feeding fledgling yellowheads at the time when wasps numbers reach their peak in the autumn, whereas the offspring of other forest birds are independent by this stage.</p>


2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
◽  
Graeme Peter Elliott

<p>This study aimed to find an explanation for the decline of yellowheads and formulate recommendations for management and further research on the species. There were three main lines of investigation: basic population ecology and behaviour; the effect of introduced predators on breeding; and the habitat relationships of the species. A detailed study of a yellowhead population in the Eglinton Valley in Fiordland National Park was undertaken. Birds were caught and banded and their behaviour, breeding and survival monitored for 4 years. The relationship between yellowhead distribution and vegetation, topography, and fertility were investigated in part of Mt Aspiring National Park during one summer.  Yellowheads suffered high rates of predation from stoats during "plagues" that occurred after heavy beech seeding. Three aspects of yellowhead biology made them vulnerable to mammalian predation: (1) they nested in holes and predators killed not only eggs and nestlings, but also incubating adults; (2) only the females incubated, thus losses to predators had a greater effect on the population than if equal numbers of males and females were killed; and (3) yellowheads nested later than most other forest passerines and were still nesting when stoat numbers reached their summer peak. Though the yellowhead's hole nesting habit made them vulnerable to mammals it restricted nest parasitism and predation by long-tailed cuckoos and hole nesting is likely to have evolved in response to cuckoos. Yellowheads were found to be tall forest specialists; they occurred more frequently in tall forests than short ones, and preferentially used the largest trees. Their choice of nest sites had no effect on their preference for any forest types. The forests they favoured grew mainly on fertile valley floors at low altitudes. Yellowhead populations in "good habitats" raised two broods a year and these populations are probably sufficiently productive to withstand stoat plagues occurring once every 5 years, the average frequency of this event. Populations in "poor habitats" raise only one brood and their productivity is probably insufficient to match losses to stoats. Such populations are probably slowly declining, and are very vulnerable to extinction. A habitat suitability index was devised and forests in the north of the South Island from which yellowheads have disappeared, were compared with those in the south where yellowheads persist. Northern forests were as good for yellowheads as southern ones. Thus, the combination of habitat preference and predation cannot account for the recent disappearance of yellowheads from the northern half of the South Island. The decline in yellowheads was attributed to both predation by introduced mammals and competition with introduced vespulid wasps. Predation may have eliminated yellowheads from podocarp-dominated forests where predator numbers are constantly high, but they survive in some beech forests where predator numbers rise only once every five years. However, even within beech forests only the most productive populations are sufficiently productive to survive predation and these populations are probably susceptible to competition with wasps which eat large numbers of invertebrates. Yellowheads are likely to be more vulnerable to wasp competition than other forest insectivores because: (1) predation has reduced their productivity more than other birds because they nest in holes; (2) they are specialised in low altitude, tall forest that the wasps also favour; (3) their breeding is later than most other forest birds and their period of juvenile dependence much longer. Yellowheads are still feeding fledgling yellowheads at the time when wasps numbers reach their peak in the autumn, whereas the offspring of other forest birds are independent by this stage.</p>


Author(s):  
Anna Elizabeth de Oliveira-Silva ◽  
Augusto João Piratelli ◽  
Damaris Zurell ◽  
Fernando Rodrigues da Silva

BMC Biology ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 19 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Marco Basile ◽  
Thomas Asbeck ◽  
João M. Cordeiro Pereira ◽  
Grzegorz Mikusiński ◽  
Ilse Storch

Abstract Background Species co-occurrences can have profound effects on the habitat use of species, and therefore habitat structure alone cannot fully explain observed abundances. To account for this aspect of community organization, we developed multi-species abundance models, incorporating the local effect of co-occurring and potentially associated species, alongside with environmental predictors, linked mainly to forest management intensity. We coupled it with a landscape-scale analysis to further examine the role of management intensity in modifying the habitat preferences in connection with the landscape context. Using empirical data from the Black Forest in southern Germany, we focused on the forest bird assemblage and in particular on the cavity-nesting and canopy-foraging guilds. We included in the analysis species that co-occur and for which evidence suggests association is likely. Results Our findings show that the local effect of species associations can mitigate the effects of management intensity on forest birds. We also found that bird species express wider habitat preferences in forests under higher management intensity, depending on the landscape context. Conclusions We suspect that species associations may facilitate the utilization of a broader range of environmental conditions under intensive forest management, which benefits some species over others. Networks of associations may be a relevant factor in the effectiveness of conservation-oriented forest management.


2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
José Luis Tellería ◽  
Ricardo Enrique Hernández‐Lambraño ◽  
Roberto Carbonell

2021 ◽  
Vol 14 (0) ◽  
pp. 57-63
Author(s):  
Yutaka TAKABAYASHI ◽  
Wataru FUKUI ◽  
Shie YAMAGUCHI

The Auk ◽  
2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Joel Ralston ◽  
Alyssa M FitzGerald ◽  
Theresa M Burg ◽  
Naima C Starkloff ◽  
Ian G Warkentin ◽  
...  

Abstract Phylogeographic structure within high-latitude North American birds is likely shaped by a history of isolation in refugia during Pleistocene glaciations. Previous studies of individual species have come to diverse conclusions regarding the number and location of likely refugia, but no studies have explicitly tested for biogeographic concordance in a comparative phylogeographic framework. Here we use a hierarchical approximate Bayesian computation analysis of mitochondrial DNA sequences from 653 individuals of 6 bird species that are currently co-distributed in the boreal forest of North America to test for biogeographic congruence. We find support for congruent phylogeographic patterns across species, with shallow divergence dating to the Holocene within each species. Combining genetic results with paleodistribution modeling, we propose that these species shared a single Pleistocene refugium south of the ice sheets in eastern North America. Additionally, we assess modern geographic genetic structure within species, focusing on Newfoundland and disjunct high-elevation populations at the southern periphery of ranges. We find evidence for a “periphery effect” in some species with significant genetic structure among peripheral populations and between peripheral and central populations. Our results suggest that reduced gene flow among peripheral populations, rather than discordant biogeographic histories, can explain the small differences in genetic structure and levels of genetic diversity among co-distributed boreal forest birds.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document