sobolev inequality
Recently Published Documents


TOTAL DOCUMENTS

353
(FIVE YEARS 77)

H-INDEX

27
(FIVE YEARS 3)

2021 ◽  
Vol 33 (1) ◽  
pp. 141-153
Author(s):  
N. Ustinov

Sufficient conditions are provided for the existence of a ground state solution for the problem generated by the fractional Sobolev inequality in Ω ∈ C 2 : \Omega \in C^2: ( − Δ ) S p s u ( x ) + u ( x ) = u 2 s ∗ − 1 ( x ) (-\Delta )_{Sp}^s u(x) + u(x) = u^{2^*_s-1}(x) . Here ( − Δ ) S p s (-\Delta )_{Sp}^s stands for the s s th power of the conventional Neumann Laplacian in Ω ⋐ R n \Omega \Subset \mathbb {R}^n , n ≥ 3 n \geq 3 , s ∈ ( 0 , 1 ) s \in (0, 1) , 2 s ∗ = 2 n / ( n − 2 s ) 2^*_s = 2n/(n-2s) . For the local case where s = 1 s = 1 , corresponding results were obtained earlier for the Neumann Laplacian and Neumann p p -Laplacian operators.


Author(s):  
Jonison L. Carvalho ◽  
Marcelo F. Furtado ◽  
Everaldo S. Medeiros

2021 ◽  
Vol 2021 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Jing Zhang ◽  
Qiongfen Zhang

AbstractIn this paper, we focus on the existence of solutions for the Choquard equation $$\begin{aligned} \textstyle\begin{cases} {-}\Delta {u}+V(x)u=(I_{\alpha }* \vert u \vert ^{\frac{\alpha }{N}+1}) \vert u \vert ^{ \frac{\alpha }{N}-1}u+\lambda \vert u \vert ^{p-2}u,\quad x\in \mathbb{R}^{N}; \\ u\in H^{1}(\mathbb{R}^{N}), \end{cases}\displaystyle \end{aligned}$$ { − Δ u + V ( x ) u = ( I α ∗ | u | α N + 1 ) | u | α N − 1 u + λ | u | p − 2 u , x ∈ R N ; u ∈ H 1 ( R N ) , where $\lambda >0$ λ > 0 is a parameter, $\alpha \in (0,N)$ α ∈ ( 0 , N ) , $N\ge 3$ N ≥ 3 , $I_{\alpha }: \mathbb{R}^{N}\to \mathbb{R}$ I α : R N → R is the Riesz potential. As usual, $\alpha /N+1$ α / N + 1 is the lower critical exponent in the Hardy–Littlewood–Sobolev inequality. Under some weak assumptions, by using minimax methods and Pohožaev identity, we prove that this problem admits a ground state solution if $\lambda >\lambda _{*}$ λ > λ ∗ for some given number $\lambda _{*}$ λ ∗ in three cases: (i) $2< p<\frac{4}{N}+2$ 2 < p < 4 N + 2 , (ii) $p=\frac{4}{N}+2$ p = 4 N + 2 , and (iii) $\frac{4}{N}+2< p<2^{*}$ 4 N + 2 < p < 2 ∗ . Our result improves the previous related ones in the literature.


Foundations ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 1 (2) ◽  
pp. 256-264
Author(s):  
Takuya Yamano

A non-uniform (skewed) mixture of probability density functions occurs in various disciplines. One needs a measure of similarity to the respective constituents and its bounds. We introduce a skewed Jensen–Fisher divergence based on relative Fisher information, and provide some bounds in terms of the skewed Jensen–Shannon divergence and of the variational distance. The defined measure coincides with the definition from the skewed Jensen–Shannon divergence via the de Bruijn identity. Our results follow from applying the logarithmic Sobolev inequality and Poincaré inequality.


2021 ◽  
Vol 4 ◽  
pp. 1143-1161
Author(s):  
Justin Salez
Keyword(s):  

Author(s):  
Franck Barthe ◽  
Michał Strzelecki

AbstractProbability measures satisfying a Poincaré inequality are known to enjoy a dimension-free concentration inequality with exponential rate. A celebrated result of Bobkov and Ledoux shows that a Poincaré inequality automatically implies a modified logarithmic Sobolev inequality. As a consequence the Poincaré inequality ensures a stronger dimension-free concentration property, known as two-level concentration. We show that a similar phenomenon occurs for the Latała–Oleszkiewicz inequalities, which were devised to uncover dimension-free concentration with rate between exponential and Gaussian. Motivated by the search for counterexamples to related questions, we also develop analytic techniques to study functional inequalities for probability measures on the line with wild potentials.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document