membrane electrode assemblies
Recently Published Documents


TOTAL DOCUMENTS

336
(FIVE YEARS 58)

H-INDEX

42
(FIVE YEARS 7)

Chem ◽  
2022 ◽  
Author(s):  
Lei Ge ◽  
Hesamoddin Rabiee ◽  
Mengran Li ◽  
Siddhartha Subramanian ◽  
Yao Zheng ◽  
...  

Membranes ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 11 (9) ◽  
pp. 686
Author(s):  
Aviv Ashdot ◽  
Mordechai Kattan ◽  
Anna Kitayev ◽  
Ervin Tal-Gutelmacher ◽  
Alina Amel ◽  
...  

Production of hydrocarbon-based, alkaline exchange, membrane–electrode assemblies (MEA’s) for fuel cells and electrolyzers is examined via catalyst-coated membrane (CCM) and gas-diffusion electrode (GDE) fabrication routes. The inability effectively to hot-press hydrocarbon-based ion-exchange polymers (ionomers) risks performance limitations due to poor interfacial contact, especially between GDE and membrane. The addition of an ionomeric interlayer is shown greatly to improve the intimacy of contact between GDE and membrane, as determined by ex situ through-plane MEA impedance measurements, indicated by a strong decrease in the frequency of the high-frequency zero phase angle of the complex impedance, and confirmed in situ with device performance tests. The best interfacial contact is achieved with CCM’s, with the contact impedance decreasing, and device performance increasing, in the order GDE >> GDE+Interlayer > CCM. The GDE+interlayer fabrication approach is further examined with respect to hydrogen crossover and alkaline membrane electrolyzer cell performance. An interlayer strongly reduces the rate of hydrogen crossover without strongly decreasing electrolyzer performance, while crosslinking the ionomeric layer further reduces the crossover rate though also limiting device performance. The approach can be applied and built upon to improve the design and production of alkaline, and more generally, hydrocarbon-based MEA’s and exchange membrane devices.


2021 ◽  
Vol 417 ◽  
pp. 129280
Author(s):  
Prabhuraj Balakrishnan ◽  
Fereshteh Dehghani Sanij ◽  
Puiki Leung ◽  
Huaneng Su ◽  
Qian Xu ◽  
...  

2021 ◽  
pp. 130494
Author(s):  
A. Hernández-Flores ◽  
M.I. Salazar-Gastélum ◽  
S. Pérez-Sicairos ◽  
T. Romero-Castañón ◽  
J.R. Flores-Hernández

2021 ◽  
Vol MA2021-01 (38) ◽  
pp. 1230-1230
Author(s):  
Britta Mayerhöfer ◽  
Konrad Ehelebe ◽  
Florian Dominik Speck ◽  
Markus Bierling ◽  
David McLaughlin ◽  
...  

2021 ◽  
Vol 12 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Julius Knöppel ◽  
Maximilian Möckl ◽  
Daniel Escalera-López ◽  
Kevin Stojanovski ◽  
Markus Bierling ◽  
...  

AbstractRecent research indicates a severe discrepancy between oxygen evolution reaction catalysts dissolution in aqueous model systems and membrane electrode assemblies. This questions the relevance of the widespread aqueous testing for real world application. In this study, we aim to determine the processes responsible for the dissolution discrepancy. Experimental parameters known to diverge in both systems are individually tested for their influence on dissolution of an Ir-based catalyst. Ir dissolution is studied in an aqueous model system, a scanning flow cell coupled to an inductively coupled plasma mass spectrometer. Real dissolution rates of the Ir OER catalyst in membrane electrode assemblies are measured with a specifically developed, dedicated setup. Overestimated acidity in the anode catalyst layer and stabilization over time in real devices are proposed as main contributors to the dissolution discrepancy. The results shown here lead to clear guidelines for anode electrocatalyst testing parameters to resemble realistic electrolyzer operating conditions.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document