remote attestation
Recently Published Documents


TOTAL DOCUMENTS

199
(FIVE YEARS 59)

H-INDEX

13
(FIVE YEARS 3)

2021 ◽  
Vol 24 (4) ◽  
pp. 1-23
Author(s):  
Sarah C. Helble ◽  
Ian D. Kretz ◽  
Peter A. Loscocco ◽  
John D. Ramsdell ◽  
Paul D. Rowe ◽  
...  

Remote attestation consists of generating evidence of a system’s integrity via measurements and reporting the evidence to a remote party for appraisal in a form that can be trusted. The parties that exchange information must agree on formats and protocols. We assert there is a large variety of patterns of interactions among appraisers and attesters of interest. Therefore, it is important to standardize on flexible mechanisms for remote attestation. We make our case by describing scenarios that require the exchange of evidence among multiple parties using a variety of message passing patterns. We show cases in which changes in the order of evidence collection result in important differences to what can be inferred by an appraiser. We argue that adding the ability to negotiate the appropriate kind of attestation allows for remote attestations that better adapt to a dynamically changing environment. Finally, we suggest a language-based solution to taming the complexity of specifying and negotiating attestation procedures.


2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ivan De Oliveira Nunes ◽  
Sashidhar Jakkamsetti ◽  
Norrathep Rattanavipanon ◽  
Gene Tsudik
Keyword(s):  

2021 ◽  
pp. 102498
Author(s):  
Boyu Kuang ◽  
Anmin Fu ◽  
Willy Susilo ◽  
Shui Yu ◽  
Yansong Gao

2021 ◽  
Vol 11 (16) ◽  
pp. 7339
Author(s):  
Paul Georg Wagner ◽  
Christian Lengenfelder ◽  
Gerrit Holzbach ◽  
Maximilian Becker ◽  
Pascal Birnstill ◽  
...  

The automated documentation of work steps is a requirement of many modern manufacturing processes. Especially when it comes to important procedures such as safety critical screw connections or weld seams, the correct and complete execution of certain manufacturing steps needs to be properly supervised, e.g., by capturing video snippets of the worker to be checked in hindsight. Without proper technical and organizational safeguards, such documentation data carries the potential for covert performance monitoring to the disadvantage of employees. Naïve documentation architectures interfere with data protection requirements, and thus cannot expect acceptance of employees. In this paper we outline use cases for automated documentation and describe an exemplary system architecture of a workflow recognition and documentation system. We derive privacy protection goals that we address with a suitable security architecture based on hybrid encryption, secret-sharing among multiple parties and remote attestation of the system to prevent manipulation. We finally contribute an outlook towards problems and possible solutions with regards to information that can leak through accessible metadata and with regard to more modular system architectures, where more sophisticated remote attestation approaches are needed to ensure the integrity of distributed components.


2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jeppe Hagelskjar Ostergaard ◽  
Edlira Dushku ◽  
Nicola Dragoni
Keyword(s):  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document