Differences in Immune Indicators and Prognosis Between IgG4-Positive and Negative Lacrimal Gland Benign Lymphoepithelial Lesion

Purpose: The differences in immune indicators and prognosis between IgG4-positive and negative lacrimal gland benign lymphoepithelial lesion (LGBLEL) were analyzed.Methods: This was a single-center retrospective clinical study. Clinical data of 146 patients with LGBLEL were collected from June 2011 to June 2019. Results: The age, preoperative glucocorticoid history, and serum C3, C4, IgG, IgG2, IgG4 had statistical difference between the IgG4-positive and negative groups (P<0.05). The expression levels of IgG and IgG4 in the IgG-positive group with preoperative glucocorticoid therapy were lower than those in the IgG4-negative group without preoperative glucocorticoid therapy (P=0.021 and P=0.013). The 5-year recurrence-free cumulative percentages of IgG4-positive group was 81.85%, and 83.46% in the IgG-negative group, which had no statistical difference (P=0.216). The history of preoperative glucocorticoid therapy, serum C4, IgG1 and IgG2 were the factors affecting IgG4-positive LGBLEL’ recurrence, while the history of preoperative glucocorticoid therapy, serum C4, and IgG1 were the factors affecting LGBLEL’ recurrence (P<0.05).Conclusion: Serum C3, C4, IgG, IgG2, IgG4 had statistical difference between the IgG4-positive and negative LGBLEL. The history of preoperative glucocorticoid therapy, serum C4 and IgG1 were the factors affecting LGBLEL’ recurrence, while the expression level of IgG4 was not the factor affecting LGBLEL’ recurrence.

Toll-like Receptors Regulate MIF Expression in Benign Lymphoepithelial Lesion of the Lacrimal Gland

Despite a perpetual increase in the prevalence of benign lymphoepithelial lesion, data on the mechanisms governing its pathogenesis are still missing. Thus, we aimed in the present study to evaluate whether TLRs could regulate the expression of the pleiotropic pro-inflammatory and tumor-related cytokine MIF in BLEL. Using gene expression profiling and protein expression analysis methods, we found that TLRs were overexpressed and that their signaling pathways were activated in BLEL. We have also confirmed in tissues biopsies, the overexpression of MIF reported previously in plasma of BLEL specimen. The analysis of the TLR7/8 impact on the expression of MIF in BLEL primary cells showed that when activated, TLR7/8 stimulate mainly BLEL lymphocytes to release MIF but not the fibroblast-like cells. No significant change was observed when MIF expression was investigated at the transcriptional level 24h post TLR7/8 activation. Taken together, these data suggest that TLR7 and TLR8 are activated in BLEL and may induce a cell type-dependent regulation of MIF secretion and expression.