SISTEM PENDUKUNG KEPUTUSAN KELOMPOK DENGAN METODE NOMINAL GROUP TECHNIQUE (NGT) BERBASIS WEB (STUDI KASUS: ORGANISASI GEPAK KORWIL SAMARINDA ULU)

Group Support System (GSS) ialah system pendukung keputusan kelompok yang digunakan untuk menghasilkan alternative solusi dari para anggota untuk rekomendasi seorang manajer dalam menghasilkan keputusan. Metode Nominal Group Technique (NGT) ialah metode yang dikembangkan untuk menghasilkan solusi dengan tingkat efektif yang tinggi baik dari segi membangkitkan ide/gagasan maupun tingkat partisipasi. Web sendiri adalah teknologi jaringan yang menunjang berbagai interaksi social terjalin secara luas. Organisasi Gerakan Pemuda Asli Kalimantan (GEPAK) ialah organisasi etnis yang memiliki maksud dan tujuan untuk meningkatkan kualitas SDM agar dapat mengelola SDA di Kalimantan. Sehingga Sistem Pendukung Keputusan Kelompok Dengan Metode Nominal Group Technique (NGT) Berbasis Web menjadi system pendukung keputusan yang membantu manajer dari Organisasi GEPAK untuk melakukan rapat dan diskusi secara efektif dan efisien baik dari segi waktu dan biaya.

Sistem Pendukung Keputusan Kelompok Dengan Metode Nominal Group Technique (NGT) Berbasis Web (Studi Kasus : Organisasi Gepak Korwil Samarinda Ulu)

Group Support System (GSS) ialah system pendukung keputusan kelompok yang digunakan untuk menghasilkan alternative solusi dari para anggota untuk rekomendasi seorang manajer dalam menghasilkan keputusan. Metode Nominal Group Technique (NGT) ialah metode yang dikembangkan untuk menghasilkan solusi dengan tingkat efektif yang tinggi baik darisegi membangkitkan ide/gagasan maupun tingkat partisipasi. Web sendiri adalah teknologi jaringan yang menunjang berbagai interaksi social terjalin secara luas. Organisasi Gerakan Pemuda Asli Kalimantan (GEPAK) ialah organisasi etnis yang memiliki maksud dan tujuan untuk meningkatkan kualitas SDM agar dapat mengelola SDA di Kalimantan. Sehingga Sistem Pendukung Keputusan Kelompok Dengan Metode Nominal Group Technique(NGT) Berbasis Web menjadi system pendukung keputusan yang membantu manajer dari Organisasi GEPAK untuk melakukan rapat dan diskusi secara efektif dan efisien baik dari segi waktu dan biaya.

Group support system and explanatory feedback: An experimental study of mitigating halo effect

Comprehensive assessment potentially leads to halo effect that will affect accuracy of auditors decision-making process. Biased initial audit decision will potentially influence final audit decision. It is there-fore necessary to mitigate halo effect that is the consequence of auditors good impression on clients initial condition. This re-search aims to empirically show that halo effect can be mitigated by explanatory feedback and Group Support System (GSS). The researchers experimentally mani-pulate explanatory feedback and GSS using online web-site. The subjects are stu-dents who have already taken auditing courses. The results show that: 1) explanato-ry feedback can mitigate halo effect so that audit decision will be more accurate 2) GSS can also mitigate halo effect 3) explanatory feedback and GSS are the best me-thods to mitigate halo effect.

Developing Conversations

This paper explores the process of supporting learning through the use of a ‘low impact' Group Support System (GSS) based on handset technology. The protocol used is described and a conceptual framework is proposed with which to explain practice. The framework centres on the encouragement of conversation which is focused on the reasons for differences, coupled with a reduction of personal anxiety, achieved with the flexibility offered through the GSS meeting environment. A field-based case study in post graduate education is reported in detail, and a number of other field-based case studies are reported in summary. These serve to demonstrate the potential for suitably designed Group Support Systems to aid groups to overcome certain fundamental difficulties with which they have to contend.

A DECISION RECONSTRUCTION SUPPORT MODEL

The importance of understanding the reasons for past decisions is not a new subject. However, there seems to be a gap when it comes to verifying the efficiency of tools for understanding past decisions. In this paper, we show that the ability to perform decision reconstruction using a Group Support System (GSS) can provide a flexible solution to the problem, but only if the information model underlying it is able to provide bidirectional support to the phases of a decision-making process. For this, we present a general information model to support the decision-making process, as well as the decision reconstruction process. We tested these ideas by setting up a case study where we used a GSS, based on our model, to analyze a simulated public contracting process. We present a discussion of the results.

MUSTER

In this chapter they present a collaborative and situational tool called MUSTER, that has been specifically designed and developed for requirements elicitation workshops, and which utilizes, extends, and demonstrates a successful application of intelligent technologies for Computer Aided Software Engineering and Computer Aided Method Engineering. The primary objective of this tool is to improve the effectiveness and efficiency of the requirements elicitation process for software systems development, whilst addressing some of the common issues often encountered in practice through the integration of intelligent technologies. The tool also offers an example of how a group support system, coupled with artificial intelligence, can be applied to very practical activities and situations within the software development process.