Male cancer patient sperm cryopreservation for fertility preservation: 10-year monocentric experience

Background Sperm cryopreservation, an effective method for preserving male fertility, is very advantageous for men suffering from cancer. Unfortunately, as both physicians and cancer patients are unaware of the possibilities for sperm cryopreservation, the data on evaluation of semen parameters and disposition of cryopreserved samples among Chinese cancer patients are scarce. Results Male tumours were classified into six major types, germ cell tumours (26 %), haematological neoplasms (28 %), head and neck cancers (19 %), thoracic tumours (4 %), abdominal tumours (10 %), and others (13 %). Haematological neoplasm was the most prevalent cancer among our cohort of patients who opted for sperm banking, followed by germ cell tumours. Patients with germ cell tumours had the lowest pre-thaw and post-thaw seminal sperm concentrations. We separately compared patients with testicular tumours, lymphoma, and leukaemia, and found that leukaemia patients had the lowest pre-thaw sperm concentrations. Most cancer patients (58 %) chose to keep their specimens stored, while 31 % chose to discard the specimens. Over the years, only 13 patients (4 %) returned to use their spermatozoa by assisted reproductive technology. Of the stored samples, patients with germ cell tumours constituted the highest proportion (29.3 %). Moreover, the percentage of haematological neoplasm patients who had no spermatozoa frozen was the highest (46.2 %). Conclusions The present data confirm the deleterious impact of various cancers on semen quality. Leukaemia was associated with the worst semen quality and the highest number of semen samples that could not be frozen. We suggest that sperm quality may have decreased even before anti-neoplastic treatment and that sperm banking before treatment should be strongly recommended for cancer patients. A sperm banking programme before gonadotoxic therapy requires close cooperation between assisted reproduction centres and cancer clinics.

Acute urinary retention in a 27-year-old male secondary to benign prostatic hyperplasia treated with Holmium Enucleation of the Prostate (HOLEP)

Introduction: Benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH) is common in the ageing male. Clinical manifestations like retention impact on a patient’s quality of life. Alterations in androgen activity at the androgen receptor complex level in the prostate contribute to prostatic hyperplasia with the highest incidence occurring in males in their 70’s. There remains a paucity of cases in young males who develop acute urinary retention secondary to BPH. We present a case of a 27-year-old male who developed acute urinary retention secondary to BPH who required a Holmium Laser Enucleation of his Prostate (HOLEP). Case description: A 27 year old man was admitted in acute urinary retention. BPH was diagnosed via way of radiological imaging and histological assessment. After pre-operative sperm banking and suprapubic catheterisation, the patient underwent a HOLEP. He had biochemically confirmed hypogonadotrophic hypogonadism which was at odds with his muscular, physical appearance. Total testosterone levels had fluctuated following admission suggesting an exogenous substance was interfering with the hypothalamic-pituitary-gonadal axis but he denied exogenous steroid use. Result: The patient successfully passed his voiding trial on the second post-operative day and remained catheter free. Post-operative uroflowmetry and sexual function remain unknown as patient disengaged with follow up. Conclusion: HOLEP prostatectomy is a safe and effective way of managing BPH in younger patients following sperm banking and assessment by endocrinology.

Sperm cryopreservation of male cancer patients for fertility preservation : 10-year monocentric experience

Background: Semen cryopreservation is an effective method to preserve fertility, which is very important for male cancer patients. Unfortunately, due to unaware of the opportunities for sperm cryopreservation for both physicians and cancer patients, not a lot of data on evaluating the semen parameters and dispositions of the cryopreserved samples of Chinese cancer population are available in the literature. Methods: We retrospectively reviewed semen parameters as well as the clinical outcomes of assisted reproductive treatments (ART) of 339 male cancer patients of Chinese population who were referred to our center from 2010 to 2019 for fertility preservation. Results: We first classify the male tumors into six major types according to body regions. The most prevalent cancer patients who came from our cohort for sperm banking were hematological neoplasms patients, and the second cancers were germ cell tumors. Patients with germ cell tumors had the lowest pre- thaw and post-thaw concentration among the six major cancer types. However, we separately compared among testicular tumors, lymphoma and leukemia, it turned out that leukemia had the lowest pre-thaw concentration. Most cancer patients (58%) chose to go on keeping their specimens in storage. The second proportion selected to discard their specimens electively (31%). Over the years, there were only 13 patients (4%) returned to use their sperm by ART. In the storage samples, germ cell tumors were the most proportion ones (29.3%). Moreover, in the unfrozen samples, the percentage of hematological neoplasms were the most (45.5%).Conclusions: To our knowledge, we had owned the most numbers of male cancers who came to sperm bank for fertility conservation in the southwest of China. In our study we suggested that sperm quality could decrease even before antineoplastic treatment and sperm banking prior to treatment should be strongly recommended for male cancer patients.