radiopharmaceutical therapy
Recently Published Documents


TOTAL DOCUMENTS

87
(FIVE YEARS 38)

H-INDEX

14
(FIVE YEARS 3)

2021 ◽  
Vol 62 (Supplement 3) ◽  
pp. 73S-79S
Author(s):  
Michael Lassmann ◽  
Uta Eberlein ◽  
Jonathan Gear ◽  
Mark Konijnenberg ◽  
Jolanta Kunikowska

2021 ◽  
Vol 62 (Supplement 3) ◽  
pp. 3S-11S
Author(s):  
Jacek Capala ◽  
Stephen A. Graves ◽  
Aaron Scott ◽  
George Sgouros ◽  
Sara St. James ◽  
...  

Author(s):  
George Sgouros ◽  
Wesley E. Bolch ◽  
Arturo Chiti ◽  
Yuni K. Dewaraja ◽  
Dimitris Emfietzoglou ◽  
...  

2021 ◽  
Vol 62 (Supplement 3) ◽  
pp. 60S-72S
Author(s):  
Neeta Pandit-Taskar ◽  
Amir Iravani ◽  
Dan Lee ◽  
Heather Jacene ◽  
Dan Pryma ◽  
...  

2021 ◽  
Vol 8 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Alessandro Desy ◽  
Guillaume F. Bouvet ◽  
Étienne Croteau ◽  
Nancy Lafrenière ◽  
Éric E. Turcotte ◽  
...  

Abstract Background Accurate QSPECT is crucial in dosimetry-based, personalized radiopharmaceutical therapy with 177Lu and other radionuclides. We compared the quantitative performance of three NaI(Tl)-crystal SPECT/CT systems equipped with low-energy high-resolution collimators from two vendors (Siemens Symbia T6; GE Discovery 670 and NM/CT 870 DR). Methods Using up to 14 GBq of 99mTc in planar mode, we determined the calibration factor and dead-time constant under the assumption that these systems have a paralyzable behaviour. We monitored their response when one or both detectors were activated. QSPECT capability was validated by SPECT/CT imaging of a customized NEMA phantom containing up to 17 GBq of 99mTc. Acquisitions were reconstructed with a third-party ordered subset expectation maximization algorithm. Results The Siemens system had a higher calibration factor (100.0 cps/MBq) and a lower dead-time constant (0.49 μs) than those from GE (75.4–87.5 cps/MBq; 1.74 μs). Activities of up to 3.3 vs. 2.3–2.7 GBq, respectively, were quantifiable by QSPECT before the observed count rate plateaued or decreased. When used in single-detector mode, the QSPECT capability of the former system increased to 5.1 GBq, whereas that of the latter two systems remained independent of the detectors activation mode. Conclusion Despite similar hardware, SPECT/CT systems’ response can significantly differ at high count rate, which impacts their QSPECT capability in a post-therapeutic setting.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document