ammonia uptake
Recently Published Documents


TOTAL DOCUMENTS

82
(FIVE YEARS 17)

H-INDEX

21
(FIVE YEARS 0)

Author(s):  
Huiyong Wang ◽  
Tao Song ◽  
Zhiyong Li ◽  
Jikuan Qiu ◽  
Yang Zhao ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jiaran Li ◽  
Li Luo ◽  
Le Yang ◽  
Chaoyang Zhao ◽  
Yibang Liu ◽  
...  

A [Ph3ImH][Tf2N]2 framework constructed from ionic liquid units frustrated with ammonia presents high reversible ammonia uptake of 13.53 mmol g−1.


Catalysts ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 10 (12) ◽  
pp. 1444
Author(s):  
Zhejian Cao ◽  
Kritika Narang Landström ◽  
Farid Akhtar

Ammonia is one of the most common reductants for the automotive selective catalytic reduction (SCR) system owing to its high NO2 reduction (deNOx) efficiency. However, ammonia carriers for the SCR system have sluggishly evolved to achieve rapid ammonia dosing. In this study, the MOFs [M2(adc)2(dabco)] (M = Co, Ni, Cu, Zn) were synthesized and characterized as ammonia carriers. Among the four obtained MOFs, Ni2(adc)2(dabco) possessed the highest surface area, 772 m2/g, highest ammonia uptake capacity, 12.1 mmol/g, and stable cyclic adsorption-desorption performance. All the obtained MOFs demonstrated physisorption of ammonia and rapid kinetics of ammonia adsorption and desorption. Compared with halide ammonia carrier MgCl2, the obtained MOFs showed four times faster adsorption kinetics to reach 90% of the ammonia uptake capacity. For the ammonia desorption, the Ni2(adc)2(dabco) provided 6 mmol/g ammonia dosing when temperature reached 125 °C in the first 10 min, which was six times of the ammonia dosing from Mg(NH3)6Cl2. The results offer a solution to shorten the buffering time for ammonia dosing in the SCR system.


2020 ◽  
Vol 13 (11) ◽  
pp. 6193-6213
Author(s):  
Benjamin A. Nault ◽  
Pedro Campuzano-Jost ◽  
Douglas A. Day ◽  
Hongyu Guo ◽  
Duseong S. Jo ◽  
...  

Abstract. Measurements of the mass concentration and chemical speciation of aerosols are important to investigate their chemical and physical processing from near emission sources to the most remote regions of the atmosphere. A common method to analyze aerosols is to collect them onto filters and analyze the filters offline; however, biases in some chemical components are possible due to changes in the accumulated particles during the handling of the samples. Any biases would impact the measured chemical composition, which in turn affects our understanding of numerous physicochemical processes and aerosol radiative properties. We show, using filters collected onboard the NASA DC-8 and NSF C-130 during six different aircraft campaigns, a consistent, substantial difference in ammonium mass concentration and ammonium-to-anion ratios when comparing the aerosols collected on filters versus an Aerodyne aerosol mass spectrometer (AMS). Another online measurement is consistent with the AMS in showing that the aerosol has lower ammonium-to-anion ratios than obtained by the filters. Using a gas uptake model with literature values for accommodation coefficients, we show that for ambient ammonia mixing ratios greater than 10 ppbv, the timescale for ammonia reacting with acidic aerosol on filter substrates is less than 30 s (typical filter handling time in the aircraft) for typical aerosol volume distributions. Measurements of gas-phase ammonia inside the cabin of the DC-8 show ammonia mixing ratios of 45±20 ppbv, consistent with mixing ratios observed in other indoor environments. This analysis enables guidelines for filter handling to reduce ammonia uptake. Finally, a more meaningful limit of detection for University of New Hampshire Soluble Acidic Gases and Aerosol (SAGA) filters collected during airborne campaigns is ∼0.2 µg sm−3 of ammonium, which is substantially higher than the limit of detection of ion chromatography. A similar analysis should be conducted for filters that collect inorganic aerosol and do not have ammonia scrubbers and/or are handled in the presence of human ammonia emissions.


2020 ◽  
Vol 132 (50) ◽  
pp. 22991-22991
Author(s):  
Dae Won Kim ◽  
Dong Won Kang ◽  
Minjung Kang ◽  
Jung‐Hoon Lee ◽  
Jong Hyeak Choe ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document