Study on corporate culture of vietnamese enterprises: An approach of denison’s model

This study was conducted to identify the elements that constitute corporate culture, applying Denison’s organisational culture (DOC) model. The study uses the following data analysis methods: descriptive statistics methods were used to determine the enterprise culture's strengths and weaknesses and the DOC model to assess corporate culture. The results show that the corporate culture scale of the studied business is made up of 12 factors: empowerment, team orientation, capacity development, core values, agreement, coordination and integration, creating change, customer focus, organizational learning, strategic direction and intent, goals and objectives, and vision. The results show that the studied enterprises achieve consistency when building a long-term vision and mission, and stable objectives. According to the DOC model's calculation formula, core values, agreement, coordination and integration are also significantly promoted in the studied enterprises' corporate culture.

Genetic evidence for a large overlap and potential bidirectional causal effects between resilience and well-being

Resilience and well-being are strongly related. People with higher levels of well-being are more resilient after stressful life events or trauma and vice versa. Less is known about the underlying sources of overlap and causality between the constructs. In a sample of 11.304 twins and 2.572 siblings from the Netherlands Twin Register, we investigated the overlap and possible direction of causation between resilience (i.e. the absence of psychiatric symptoms despite negative life events) and well-being (i.e. satisfaction with life) using polygenic score (PGS) prediction, twin-sibling modelling, and the Mendelian Randomization Direction of Causality (MR-DoC) model. Longitudinal twin-sibling models showed significant phenotypic correlations between resilience and well-being (.41/.51 at time 1 and 2). Well-being PGS were predictive for both well-being and resilience, indicating that genetic factors influencing well-being also predict resilience. Twin-sibling modeling confirmed this genetic correlation (.71) and showed a strong environmental correlation (.93). In line with causality, both genetic (51%) and environmental (49%) factors contributed significantly to the covariance between resilience and well-being. Furthermore, the results of within-subject and MZ twin differences analyses were in line with bidirectional causality. Additionally, we used the MR-DoC model combining both molecular and twin data to test causality, while correcting for pleiotropy. We confirmed the causal effect from well-being to resilience, with the direct effect of well-being explaining 11% (T1) and 20% (T2) of the variance in resilience. Data limitations prevented us to test the directional effect from resilience to well-being with the MR-DoC model. To conclude, we showed a strong relation between well-being and resilience. A first attempt to quantify the direction of this relationship points towards a bidirectional causal effect. If replicated, the potential mutual effects can have implications for interventions to lower psychopathology vulnerability, as resilience and well-being are both negatively related to psychopathology.

Frequent Pattern Mining over Unstructured Data using Semi-Structured Doc-Model and Pattern Ranking

Frequent pattern mining is an essential data-mining task, with a goal of discovering knowledge in the form of repeated patterns. Many efficient pattern-mining algorithms have been discovered in the last two decades, yet most do not scale to the type of data we are presented with today, the so-called “Big Data”. Scalable parallel algorithms hold the key to solving the problem in this context. This paper reviews recent advances in parallel frequent pattern mining, analysing them through the Big Data lens. Load balancing and work partitioning are the major challenges to be conquered. These challenges always invoke innovative methods to do, as Big Data evolves with no limits. The biggest challenge than before is conquering unstructured data for finding frequent patterns. To accomplish this Semi Structured Doc-Model and ranking of patterns are used.

A Major Limitation of the Direction of Causation Model: Non-Shared Environmental Confounding

Determining (1) the direction of causation and (2) the size of causal effects between two constructs is a central challenge of the scientific study of humans. In the early 1990s, researchers in behavioral genetics invented what was termed the direction of causation (DoC) model to address exactly these two concerns. The model claims that for any two traits whose mode of inheritance is sufficiently different, the direction of causation can be ascertained using a sufficiently large genetically informative sample. Using a series of simulation studies, we demonstrate a major challenge to the DoC model, namely that it is extremely sensitive to even tiny amounts of non-shared confounding. Even under ideal conditions for the DoC model (a large sample,N= 10,000), a large causal relationship (e.g., a causal correlation of .50) with very different modes of inheritance between the two traits (e.g., a pure AE model for one trait and a pure CE model for another trait) and a modest degree (correlation of .10) of non-shared confounding between the two traits results in the choice of the wrong causal models and estimating the wrong causal effects.

Using genetic information to test causal relationships in cross-sectional data

Cross-sectional data from twins contain information that can be used to derive a test of causality between traits. This test of directionality is based upon the fact that genetic relationships between family members conform to an established structural pattern. In this paper we examine several common methods for empirically testing causality as well as several genetic models that we build on for the Direction of Causation (DoC) model. We then discuss the mathematical components of the DoC model and highlight limitations of the model and potential solutions to these limitations. We conclude by presenting an example from the personality and politics literature that has begun to explore the question whether or not personality traits cause people to hold specific political attitudes.