The Effectiveness of Compression Socks for Athletic Performance and Recovery

Clinical Scenario:The popularity of compression socks has increased substantially among athletes, particularly those participating in endurance events such as running and triathlon. Companies are increasingly marketing compression stockings to runners, triathletes, and other endurance athletes for the benefits of improved performance and/or decreased recovery time. Originally developed for the treatment of deep-vein thrombosis, compression socks are now marketed as a tool to improve venous return, thus believed to improve both performance and recovery in athletes. The use of compression socks during training aims to help the skeletal-muscle pump, increase deep venous velocity, and/or decrease blood pooling in the calf veins and alleviate delayed-onset muscle soreness. The scenario is a 28-y-old recreational triathlete seeking your advice while training for her first half-Ironman. She occasionally complains of tightness in the calves both during and after running. She wants your opinion on the effectiveness of using compression socks to help her performance and recovery.Focused Clinical Question:What is the effectiveness of using graduated compression socks for improving athletic performance and decreasing recovery time in healthy endurance athletes?

Muscle blood flow response to contraction: influence of venous pressure

The skeletal muscle pump is thought to be at least partially responsible for the immediate muscle hyperemia seen with exercise. We hypothesized that increases in venous pressure within the muscle would enhance the effectiveness of the muscle pump and yield greater postcontraction hyperemia. In nine anesthetized beagle dogs, arterial inflow and venous outflow of a single hindlimb were measured with ultrasonic transit-time flow probes in response to 1-s tetanic contractions evoked by electrical stimulation of the sciatic nerve. Venous pressure in the hindlimb was manipulated by tilting the upright dogs to a 30° angle in the head-up or head-down positions. The volume of venous blood expelled during contractions was 2.2 ± 0.2, 1.6 ± 0.2, and 1.4 ± 0.2 ml with the head-up, horizontal, and head-down positions, respectively. Although altering hindlimb venous pressure influenced venous expulsion during contraction, the increase in arterial inflow was similar regardless of position. Moreover, the volume of blood expelled was a small fraction of the cumulative arterial volume after the contraction. These results suggest that the muscle pump is not a major contributor to the hyperemic response to skeletal muscle contraction.