fetal reduction
Recently Published Documents


TOTAL DOCUMENTS

166
(FIVE YEARS 48)

H-INDEX

15
(FIVE YEARS 1)

Author(s):  
Ron Bardin ◽  
Mamta Gupta ◽  
Gal Greenberg ◽  
Anchal Nandrajog ◽  
Kinneret Tenenbaum‐Gavish ◽  
...  

Author(s):  
Mark I. Evans ◽  
Jenifer Curtis ◽  
Shara M. Evans ◽  
David W. Britt
Keyword(s):  

2021 ◽  
Vol 76 (10) ◽  
pp. 579-581
Author(s):  
Anita Kaul ◽  
Smriti Prasad ◽  
Keerthana Anand ◽  
Saloni Arora ◽  
Akshatha Sharma

2021 ◽  
pp. medethics-2021-107725
Author(s):  
Joona Räsänen

In the article, Twin pregnancy, fetal reduction and the ‘all or nothing problem’, I argued that there is a moral problem in multifetal pregnancy reduction from a twin to a singleton pregnancy (2-to-1 MFPR). Drawing on Horton’s original version of the ‘all or nothing problem’, I argued that there are two intuitively plausible claims in 2-to-1 MFPR: (1) aborting both fetuses is morally permissible, (2) aborting only one of the twin fetuses is morally wrong. Yet, with the assumption that one should select permissible choice over impermissible choice, the two claims lead to a counter-intuitive conclusion: the woman ought to abort both fetuses rather than only one. It would be odd to promote such a pro-death view. Begović et al discuss my article and offer insightful criticism, claiming, that there is no ‘all or nothing problem’ present in 2-to-1 MFPR. In this short reply, I respond to some of their criticism.


2021 ◽  
Vol Publish Ahead of Print ◽  
Author(s):  
Weiran Zheng ◽  
Xinrui Yang ◽  
Yuchun Zhu ◽  
Jie Yan ◽  
Huixia Yang

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document