offering size
Recently Published Documents


TOTAL DOCUMENTS

5
(FIVE YEARS 0)

H-INDEX

1
(FIVE YEARS 0)

2017 ◽  
Vol 20 (2) ◽  
pp. 95-120
Author(s):  
Chunhua Chen ◽  
Chuntai Jin ◽  
Tianze Li ◽  
Steven X. Zheng
Keyword(s):  


2016 ◽  
Vol 19 (03) ◽  
pp. 1650020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Chuntai Jin ◽  
Tianze Li ◽  
Steven Xiaofan Zheng

In this paper, we examine how analysts react to IPO percentage offering size. We find that analysts predict lower long-term earnings growth rates for IPOs with larger percentage offering size. The sizes of both primary and secondary offering are negatively related to long-term growth rate forecasts. We find evidence that the free cash flow effect may be related to the negative relation between primary offering size and growth forecast.



Author(s):  
Demissew Diro Ejara

This study analyzes factors that determine syndicate size in ADR IPO underwriting. The information gathering role of investment bankers, complexity and risk of issue, corporate governance and transparency environment factors, and potential business relations are the basis for the analyses. Empirical results indicate decreasing syndicate size over time. No significant relation is found between syndicate size and initial day return of IPOs. The transparency environment, dilution effect of the issue, growth stage of the issuer, lead underwriter reputation, offering size and ownership concentration are found to have significant effects on syndicate size.



2008 ◽  
Vol 6 (1) ◽  
pp. 44-57
Author(s):  
Martin Ahnefeld ◽  
Mark Mietzner ◽  
Tobias Roediger ◽  
Dirk Schiereck

Privatizations are commonly associated with an increase in efficiency due to a stronger focus on profit maximization and less agency conflicts because the management does not have to serve political objectives anymore. This paper discusses whether SIPs generate positive announcement returns because of increased efficiency after the ownership transition. We apply a market model event-study methodology based on a sample of 134 SIPs in the 1979-2003 period. We identify significantly negative CAARs between -0.125% and -1.766% and find that firm and offering size, the proportion of secondary shares issued within the SIP as well as the market environment have a negative impact on announcement returns. In contrast, the negative CAARs are less distinctive for enterprises that had prior SIPs



2006 ◽  
Vol 41 (2) ◽  
pp. 407-438 ◽  
Author(s):  
De-Wai Chou ◽  
Michael Gombola ◽  
Feng-Ying Liu

AbstractThis study provides further evidence of earnings management around security offerings. We find positive and significant discretionary current accruals coincident with offerings of reverse LBOs. Issuers in the most aggressive quartile of earnings management have a one-year aftermarket return that is between 15% and 25% less than the most conservative quartile. We also find a negative and significant relation between abnormal accruals and post-issue abnormal returns within the first year after the offering. The relation remains after controlling for book-to-market ratio, firm size, offering size, and involvement of buyout specialists or management. Although earnings management has been used to explain post-issue long-term underperformance of IPOs and SEOs, our study shows that earnings management can explain post-offering returns of reverse LBOs, even in the absence of post-offering underperformance.



Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document