Combustion parameter evaluation of diesel engine via vibration acceleration signal

Efficient combustion control has increasingly become a quality requirement for automobile manufacturers because of its impact on pollutant and greenhouse gas emissions. In view of this, the management system development of modern internal combustion engines is mainly aimed at combustion control. The real-time detection of in-cylinder pressure characteristic parameters has a considerable significance on the closed-loop combustion control of the internal combustion engine. This paper presents a detection method in which the start of combustion, peak pressure, maximum pressure rise rate, and phase of maximum pressure rise rate are identified through vibration acceleration signal. In order to analyze the relationship between vibration and in-cylinder pressure signal, experimental data are acquired in a diesel engine by implementing various injection strategies and engine operating conditions (speed and load). The results show that the start of combustion can be detected by analyzing its relationship with the peak position of the filtered vibration signal, and the phase of the maximum pressure rise rate can be identified by examining its relationship with the zero-cross position that is adjacent to the right of the peak position. Moreover, the filtered vibration signals are also truncated in the same length and utilized as inputs for algorithms to detect the peak pressure and the maximum pressure rise rate. The algorithms are mainly performed on data compression (or feature extraction) and target regression. Major algorithms, such as one-dimensional convolutional neural network, compression sensing, wavelet decomposition, multilayer perceptron, and support vector machine, are tested. Various experimental results verify that for the test engine the phase detection accuracy of the start of combustion and maximum pressure rise rate is less than 1.7°CA for a 95% prediction interval width. For the detection of the peak pressure and maximum pressure rise rate, the normalized error threshold is set as 0.05, then the accuracies can be not less than 95%.

Safe operation of dual-fuel engines using constrained stochastic control

Premixed combustion strategies have the potential to achieve high thermal efficiency and to lower the engine-out emissions such as NOx. However, the combustion is initiated at several kernels which create high pressure gradients inside the cylinder. Similarly to knock in spark ignition engines, these gradients might be responsible of important pressure oscillations with a harmful potential for the engine. This work aims to analyze the in-cylinder pressure oscillations in a dual-fuel combustion engine and to determine the feedback variables, control actuators, and control approach for a safe engine operation. Three combustion modes were examined: fully, highly, and partially premixed, and three indexes were analyzed to characterize the safe operation of the engine: the maximum pressure rise rate, the ringing intensity, and the maximum amplitude of pressure oscillations (MAPO). Results show that operation constraints exclusively based on indicators such as the pressure rise rate are not sufficient for a proper limitation of the in-cylinder pressure oscillations. This paper explores the use of a knock-like controller for maintaining the resonance index magnitude under a predefined limit where the gasoline fraction and the main injection timing were selected as control variables. The proposed strategy shows the ability to maintain the percentage of cycles exceeding the specified limit at a desired threshold at each combustion mode in all the cylinders.

Study on the Liquid Seal Discharge Process in an Over-Pressurized Accident

In an over pressure accident, one or more pressurizer safety (or relief) valves will open due to the rapid pressure rise process. Once the safety (or relief) valves are open, the liquid seal will be discharged, and this will generate great discharge force to the downstream pipes. Multi-level protection is chosen using pressurizer safety (or relief) valves with different setpoint in most of Nuclear Power Plant, especially in the self-designed Generation-III Nuclear Power Plants. As the over pressure accident progresses, one or more safety (or relief) valves will be open. The downstream pipes will experience one or more times of impacts, which will influence the arrangement of the pipes. The whole discharge process is very complex, and the key influence factors are the pressure rise rate, safety (or relief) valve opening time, liquid seal temperature and volume, and the arrangement of the downstream discharge pipes. In present paper, liquid seal discharge process in an over pressure accident is studied. The pressure rise rate is so fast that three safety (or relief) valves will open one after another, which will generate three impacts on the downstream discharge pipes. It is found that for a specific design of Nuclear Power Plant, well design of the safety (or relief) valve setpoint is very important to the discharge force analysis results.

Impact of methane energy fraction on emissions, performance and cyclic variability in low-load dual fuel combustion at early injection timings

This work experimentally examines the effect of methane (a natural gas surrogate) substitution on early injection dual fuel combustion at representative low loads of 3.3 and 5.0 bar BMEPs in a single-cylinder compression ignition engine. Gaseous methane fumigated into the intake manifold at various methane energy fractions was ignited using a high-pressure diesel pilot injection at 310 °CA. For the 3.3 bar BMEP, methane energy fraction sweeps from 50% to 90% were performed; while at 5.0 bar BMEP, methane energy fraction sweeps from 70% to 90% were performed. It is observed that minimum methane energy fraction is limited by maximum pressure rise rate leading to knock and maximum methane energy fraction is limited by a high coefficient of variation in netIMEP, which leads to high cyclic variations. For 3.3 bar BMEP, maximum pressure rise rate is 8 bar/°CA at 50% methane energy fraction while at 5 bar BMEP, it is 12 bar/°CA at 70% methane energy fraction. For 3.3 bar BMEP, engine-out NOx emissions decrease by 43 times when methane energy fraction increases from 50% to 90%, and it decreases by nearly 46 times when methane energy fraction increases from 70% to 90% at 5 bar BMEP. Engine-out unburned hydrocarbon emissions increase by nearly 9 times when methane energy fraction increases from 50% to 90% at 3.3 bar BMEP, and it increases by nearly 5 times when methane energy fraction increases from 70% to 90% at 5.0 bar BMEP. Engine-out carbon monoxide emissions increase by nearly 7 times when methane energy fraction increases from 50% to 90% at 3.3 bar BMEP and by nearly 5 times when methane energy fraction increases from 70% to 90% at 5.0 bar BMEP. In addition, cyclic combustion variations at both loads were analyzed to obtain further insights into the combustion process and identify opportunities to further improve fuel conversion efficiencies at low load operation.