aedes sierrensis
Recently Published Documents


TOTAL DOCUMENTS

39
(FIVE YEARS 4)

H-INDEX

12
(FIVE YEARS 0)

Author(s):  
Caitlin S Peffers ◽  
Laura W Pomeroy ◽  
Megan E Meuti

Abstract Diapause, a period of arrested development that allows mosquitoes to survive inhospitable conditions, is triggered by short daylengths in temperate mosquitoes. Different populations of mosquitoes initiate diapause in response to a specific photoperiod, or daylength, resulting in population-specific differences in annual cycles of abundance. The photoperiod that causes approximately 50% of a population to initiate diapause is known as the critical photoperiod (CPP). The autumn daylength corresponding to the CPP in the field likely marks the day beyond which the photoperiods would trigger and maintain 50% or more diapause incidence in a population, although temperature, diet, and other factors can impact diapause initiation. In the Northern Hemisphere, northern populations of mosquitoes experience lower temperatures earlier in the year and must be triggered into diapause by longer daylengths than southern populations. CPP is genetically based, but also adapts over time responding to the population’s environment. Therefore, CPP has been shown to lengthen with increasing latitude and altitude. While the positive correlation between CPP and latitude/altitude has been established in a few mosquito species, including Aedes albopictus (Skuse, Diptera: Culicidae), Aedes triseriatus, Aedes sierrensis, and Wyeomyia smithii (Coquillett, Diptera: Culicidae), we do not know when most other species initiate their seasonal responses. As several of these species transmit important diseases, characterizing the CPP of arthropod vectors could improve existing control by ensuring that surveillance efforts align with the vector’s seasonally active period. Additionally, better understanding when mosquitoes and other vectors initiate diapause can reduce the frequency of chemical applications, thereby ameliorating the negative impacts to nontarget insects.


2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Daniel AH. Peach ◽  
Lisa M. Poirier

AbstractWe report the first records of Aedes euedes Howard, Dyar, and Knab, and Coquillettidia perturbans (Walker) from Canada’s Yukon Territory, and the first record of Ae. decticus Howard, Dyar, and Knab from British Columbia. We also report range extensions in northern BC for the western treehole mosquito, Aedes sierrensis (Ludlow), the common house mosquito, Culex pipiens L., and the cool weather mosquito Culiseta incidens (Thomson).


2020 ◽  
Vol 20 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Luis Fernando Chaves ◽  
Nadja Reissen ◽  
Gregory S White ◽  
Scott Gordon ◽  
Ary Faraji

Abstract The western tree hole mosquito, Aedes sierrensis (Ludlow), is a common nuisance mosquito and vector of Dirofilaria immitis (Leidy), the etiologic agent of dog heartworm, in western North America. Here, we compare weekly mosquito collections made with Mosquito Magnet (MM) traps, Biogents Sentinel (BGS) traps, and Biogents Bowl (BGS Bowl) traps set in Salt Lake City, UT, from the start of June to mid-August 2017. We found the number of mosquitoes decreased with rainfall and temperature independently of trap type. The highest number of mosquitoes were caught by BGS traps baited with carbon dioxide (CO2) and BG lure, which collected 62% (n = 422) of all mosquitoes, followed by the MM at 31% (n = 213), and both the BGS and BG Bowl with BG lure had 3.5% (n = 24) each. Aedes sierrensis females were caught weekly at similar densities (mean ± SD) in BGS with CO2 and lure (1.17 ± 2.93) and the MM (1.17 ± 2.66) traps during the study period. Given that BGS with CO2 and lure traps have several operational advantages over MM traps, including a quicker setup, smaller size, and lower cost, we consider BGS with CO2 and lure traps as the best suited surveillance tool to detect and remove Ae. sierrensis in the western United States and similar settings throughout North America.


2008 ◽  
Vol 45 (5) ◽  
pp. 861-866 ◽  
Author(s):  
David R. Mercer ◽  
Angela Schoergendorfer ◽  
Rhonda Vandyke

2008 ◽  
Vol 24 (1) ◽  
pp. 112-114
Author(s):  
David L. Woodward ◽  
Arthur E. Colwell ◽  
Brittany M. Mills

Ecology ◽  
2000 ◽  
Vol 81 (4) ◽  
pp. 921 ◽  
Author(s):  
Joseph N. S. Eisenberg ◽  
Jan O. Washburn ◽  
Sebastian J. Schreiber

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document