Percutaneous Microwave Coagulation Therapy: A Promising Therapeutic Method for Breaking the Barrier of the Intertumor Heterogeneity

Intertumor heterogeneity is common in various cancers and has been widely accepted as the primary cause of the diversity and variation of the effect of the same treatment on patients with the same type of tumor. Percutaneous microwave coagulation therapy (PMCT) is a minimally invasive and effective approach for destroying tumors by microwave beam under image guidance, which has been applied in lung cancer. However, no previous study has investigated the capability of PMCT solving intertumor heterogeneity. Here, we performed a component analysis of four lung cancer patients’ tumor microenvironment (TME) via single-cell RNA sequencing (scRNA-seq) and treated all four cases with PMCT. One patient’s TME could be classified into a hot tumor, mainly proinflammatory cytokines, and T cell infiltration. The other three patients’ TMEs were cold tumors, where immunosuppressive cells occupied a large proportion, including tumor-associated macrophages and cancer cells. Despite a high level of heterogeneity among their tumor microenvironment compositions, disease type and stage, and basic physical conditions, all four patients presented a stable disease (SD) without any cancer cell detected in the TME of cancer tissues after PMCT. In conclusion, this report uniquely contributed to the knowledge of the PMCT adaptation to tumor heterogeneity. Therefore, PMCT is promising to demonstrate a stable and robust antitumor efficacy in unresectable lung cancers with various TMEs.

Effect of Severity of Liver Cirrhosis on Surgical Outcomes of Hepatocellular Carcinoma After Liver Resection and Microwave Coagulation

BackgroundLiver resection (LR) and percutaneous microwave coagulation therapy (PMCT) are both considered as radical treatments for small hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). However, it is still unclear whether to select LR or PMCT in HCC patients with different degrees of liver cirrhosis. The purpose of this study was to compare the efficacy of LR and PMCT in the treatment of solitary and small HCC accompanied with different degrees of liver cirrhosis.MethodsIn this study, 230 patients with solitary HCC lesions ≤ 3 cm and Child-Pugh A liver function were retrospectively reviewed. Among these patients, 122 patients underwent LR, and 108 received PMCT. The short- and long-term outcomes were compared between these two procedures. Severity of liver cirrhosis was evaluated by using clinical scoring system (CSS) as previously published. Subgroup analysis based on CSS was performed to evaluate the effect of severity of liver cirrhosis on surgical outcomes after LR and PMCT.ResultsThere was no mortality within 90 days in both groups. Major complications were significantly more frequent in the LR group than in the PMCT group (18.8% vs. 4.6%, p<0.001). However, LR provided better surgical outcomes than PMCT. The 5-year overall survival (OS) rates for the LR and PMCT groups were 65.2% and 42%, respectively (p=0.006), and the corresponding disease-free survival (DFS) rates were 51.7% and 31.5%, respectively (p=0.004). Nevertheless, subgroup analysis showed that PMCT provided long-term outcomes that were similar to LR and lower surgical complications in HCC patients with CSS score≥4.ConclusionsLR may provide better OS and DFS rates than PMCT for patients with solitary HCC lesions ≤ 3 cm and Child-Pugh A liver function irrespective of liver cirrhosis. PMCT should be viewed as the optimal treatment for solitary and small HCC with severe cirrhosis.